Correspondences were a method of thought and expression used

Question

Correspondences were a method of thought and expression used originally in the Middle Ages to compare two different things on the basis of some perceived similarity in the order of their beings. Correspondences were used to make the world more comprehensible; for example, when lute playing was likened to the harmony or discord of the political organization to make both music and politics appear to be part of a congruent set of worldly phenomena.

Although the Elizabethan correspondences were the same as the medieval, they served different parts of the mind. It is not easy to unravel the feelings of the Elizabethans. With their passionate love of ceremony they found the formality of these correspondences very congenial. On the other hand, it was becoming more difficult for Elizabethans to understand their world as part of a rigid, coherent order: the mathematical detail of correspondences became less apt; in contrast to medieval people, Elizabethans could not base their faith on the endless accumulation of minutiae. At the same time, they desired order. They did not allow the details of a particular correspondence to take the form of minute mathematical equivalences. They made the imagination use details for its own ends; equivalences shaded off into resemblances.

This Elizabethan hovering between equivalence and metaphor may become clearer in an example. Modern astronomers, hating the asteroids for being so many and so obstructive, have named them the vermin of the sky. This expression is no more than a metaphor with emotional content. To the Middle Ages this observation would have been a highly significant fact, a new piece of evidence for the unity of creation. The Elizabethans could take the matter both ways.

It was through their retention of the main points and their flexibility in interpreting the details that the Elizabethans were able to use these correspondences in their attempt to tame a bursting and pullulating world. Even if they could not tame a new fact by fitting it into a rigid scheme, at least they could grasp it by finding that it was like something already familiar.
   1 
 1. The author implies that the purpose of medieval correspondences was to make the world more

(A) intense
(B) novel
(C) varied
(D) mystifying
(E) comprehensible

2 
 2. With which of the following statements concerning the Elizabethan Age would the author be most likely to agree?

(A) Elizabethan knowledge about the world had outstripped the capacity of prevailing modes of thought to explain it.
(B) Elizabethan knowledge had not developed to the point where it would require a scientific revolution to explain new facts.
(C) The Elizabethan Age was more interested in creating a scientific image of the world than in depicting the world poetically.
(D) The Elizabethan Age allowed knowledge about the world to develop gradually and was not surprised by new or strange information.
(E) Elizabethans continued to think of the world in medieval ways despite the accumulation of new and strange information.

3 
 3. In comparison to modern metaphors, the author finds Elizabethan correspondences to be

(A) less realistic because they were based on abstract reasoning
(B) more elaborate because they were used only on formal occasions
(C) less figurative because they were felt to explain an objective relationship
(D) more closely attuned to the period in which they originated
(E) more precise because they were based on mathematical models

4 
 4. The author implies medieval correspondences were more than mere figures of speech because they

(A) were laden with historical associations
(B) were used in a wide variety of contexts
(C) enabled medieval people to grasp new ideas
(D) enabled medieval thinkers to base their faith in an ordered universe on an endless accumulation of minutiae
(E) expressed what were thought to be figurative relationships between abstract qualities

AndrewN · Accepted Answer

Hello,  sjuniv32 . Let me begin by asking, where did you first encounter this question? (Was it on this site, or somewhere else?) I ask because there seems to be some question about the source, and I will admit that when I came to the word  pullulating  in the last paragraph, I thought the passage felt more like a GRE® passage. Anyway, this is a tough piece to unravel, incorporating language that is sometimes florid:  equivalences  shaded off  into resemblances . That could come straight from a poem.

In general, although I prefer to create a  mental map  (as I read) that outlines the gist of each paragraph, I steer away from summaries. I simply do not trust my filtering of the information enough to take on questions that might have nuanced answers, answers that would likely require a look back at the passage. With this in mind, I might lift a keyword or two from each paragraph so that I know where I might likely find my answer if a question broaches a certain topic. I keep it simple. My mental map for the passage might resemble the following:

1—correspondences, Middle Ages
2—Elizabethan correspondences
3—metaphor (mentioned twice, in fact)
4—tame (mentioned twice)/grasp

When I go through the questions, I look to disprove each answer choice, and I often take two passes to reduce the answer pool. The first pass is just to eliminate clearly incorrect answers; the second is where I do the majority of my fact-checking. Matching keywords is an essential skill that can help you arrive at a correct conclusion in just about any circumstance, regardless of how well you comprehended the passage.

QUESTION ONE

In the first question, the keywords from the question stem— the purpose of medieval correspondences was to make the world more —match nearly verbatim what the passage states in paragraph one, the paragraph about the Middle Ages (or medieval times)— Correspondences were used to make the world more comprehensible . Choice (E) it is. That one is done and dusted.

QUESTION TWO

The second question invokes the author of the passage and asks about  statements concerning the Elizabethan Age . We would expect to find our answer in paragraph two, although a detail from either three or four could creep in. This an example of a question that requires disproof more than just sniffing out the right answer. Choice (A) presents  Elizabethan knowledge  in a positive light, something the tone of the passage supports;  prevailing modes of thought  maps well onto the line from the middle of the paragraph in question:

it was becoming more difficult for Elizabethans to understand their world as part of a rigid, coherent order: the mathematical detail of correspondences became less apt

So far, so good. Leave (A) alone and complete the first sweep. Choice (B) immediately paints Elizabethan knowledge in a negative way with  had not developed . I am also wary of bold, overreaching language such as  require . If I have two doubts compared to zero from another answer choice, I feel safe eliminating the doubtful one. Choice (C) draws a comparison that the passage, in the same paragraph, even the same line as the one I have quoted above, goes against. Keep moving. In choice (D), we would need to qualify both  develop gradually  and  not surprised by new or strange information . Such details may elude us in the first pass, but they do not hold up to scrutiny in the second. I am hard-pressed to find a line to point to that expresses either notion specifically. The lines that  mimishyu  quotes in an earlier post make tenuous connections. (For instance,  at least they could grasp it by finding that it was like something already familiar  is not the same as saying that Elizabethans were  not surprised by new or strange information . In fact, they seem to have been attempting to make sense of such information.) Finally, choice (E) provides another easy elimination. Although the Elizabethans used correspondences in the same way as their medieval counterparts, the second paragraph makes it clear that the Elizabethans were interested in change.

QUESTION THREE

Question three asks about metaphors, and we know just where to look for that information: paragraph three. Since the question asks about a comparison between  modern metaphors  and  Elizabethan correspondences , we need to examine the lines in the middle of the paragraph:

This   expression is no more than a metaphor with emotional content. To the Middle Ages this observation would have been a highly significant fact, a new piece of evidence for the unity of creation.

A  fact  sounds like  objective  information, and (C) does not use any language that I find debatable. (For instance, look at  less realistic  in (A),  formal occasions  in (B),  attuned to the period  in (D), or  based on mathematical models  in (E).)

QUESTION FOUR

Finally, the key to the last question is to read carefully and understand that it is asking about  medieval correspondences ,  not  Elizabethan correspondences. In my first pass, (A) looks overstated with  laden , and  historical associations  is not a detail that stands out in my mind; (B) mentions a  wide variety of contexts , and a quick check against paragraph one shows that it is baseless; likewise, (E) goes too far in conjuring up  abstract qualities . It really comes down to (C) or (D).

(C) enabled people to grasp new ideas
 Passage  (paragraph one):  Correspondences were used to make the world more comprehensible.

(D) enabled medieval thinkers to base their faith in an ordered universe on an endless accumulation of minutiae
 Passage  (paragraph two):  the mathematical detail of correspondences became less apt; in contrast to medieval people, Elizabethans could not base their faith on the endless accumulation of minutiae.

Choice (C) incorporates what I call one-step-removed logic. The thinking might go that if correspondences allowed people to grasp new concepts, then such correspondences had to be  more than mere figures of speech . But where is the textual evidence that states as much? Which line or lines can we point to as evidence in support of the answer? Meanwhile, the contrast in (D) allows us to deduce (or infer, in the context of the question) that medieval people incorporated mathematical detail into their correspondences and based their faith, at least in part, on such minutiae. Thus, (D) is a more justifiable suggestion.

Although I took the passage on at the end of my workday, just before my last lesson, so my mind may not have been as settled as usual, my question times may still attest to the difficulty of the passage: 2:58 (with reading of the passage included); 1:44; 2:28; and 1:47. Yes, I was over the target 1:48 half of the time. I do not worry about my timing too much on RC passages, though. I know that I can make up a minute or so without much difficulty via other types of questions. It is more about achieving the right balance with a mixed-question set.

I hope that helps. I do not typically respond to RC questions that ask for such a broad analysis, but unlike yesterday, today finds me with a little more time on my hands.

- Andrew

JonShukhrat · Answer

Hi  sjuniv32

I am glad if my posts helped you in some way. However, I don’t think that I deserve to be in the same line with the other guys you mentioned. I wish I was as smart as one of their socks. Now back to the topic.

Understanding WHY the question was asked is no less important than understanding WHAT was asked. That’s what I usually do at the end of every paragraph. I imagine that I am the author of the passage and thus try to understand WHY I am telling these things. With every paragraph, I must be answering a certain question, and identifying that question is my target.

What are correspondences and why do we need them?

Correspondences are the way we learn new things. We compare a new thing to the things we already know and try to find similarities between them. This way we learn about new things.

Let’s suppose that we are a leader of a team to which we need to explain what “teamwork” is. We can say: “teamwork is like playing a guitar. A guitar can produce a great music if all its strings are played in harmony and as planned, not in discord. You can’t play a song with just one string. And if any string rips, the remaining ones are almost useless. Teamwork is the same. To achieve their target, team members should work as guitar’s strings - in harmony and as planned, not in discord.”

Now we made a correspondence between two different things, namely “teamwork” and “playing a guitar”. First we found an overlapping/congruent set between them, which is “harmony and discord”. And this overlapping set helped us use “playing a guitar” to explain what a “teamwork” is. Similarly, in the first paragraph, “harmony and discord” is common to two different things, namely “lute playing” and “political organization”.

What is the different between Elizabethan correspondence and the medieval correspondence?

The medieval people used correspondences more coolly and intellectually, rather as if they were a mathematical formula. These people may first say “Life is just. You reap what you sow”, and then explain this idea with math formula y = mx + b. Let what you sow be x, and what you reap y. m is how hard you work. b is where you start in your life. Wherever you start in your life, you can still grow however much you wish. The greater is your m, the higher you rise in your life. However, don’t get spoiled because this may turn m into negative and you may fall easily. So, you’d better figure out what x and m you need to get your desired y. So on and so forth.”

Elizabethans also used such formulas but were not restricted by them. They moved further. They felt that such formulas were less appropriate and can’t capture every detail, especially when it comes to  different parts of the mind  such as feelings, perception, volition, and such. For example, the medieval could explain why a woman wants to give birth. It would say “reproduction is a phenomenon for the continuation of species across many life forms, including humans”. However, it would fail to explain why mother can sacrifice herself for her child. Love hardly ever can be expressed with formulas. You need Elizabethans to explain this bond.

Who is more figurative?

We can see that equivalence and metaphor are two opposite extremes. Equivalence = realistic. Metaphor = figurative. “Hovering between equivalence and metaphor” means that Elizabethans could use  both . Or they couldn’t use only one.

For modern astronomers, the expression about asteroids is  no more than  a metaphor =  only  metaphor.
For the medieval, this expression is a fact =  only  realistic. 
For Elizabethans, this expression is  both . Since they considered metaphorical aspects of things, they were more figurative than the medieval. And since they also used equivalences, they were more realistic or less figurative than modern astronomers. 
This is the answer to the third question.

The last paragraph isn’t that tough I think.

________________________________________________________

1.The author implies that the purpose of medieval correspondences was to make the world more

A) intense
B) novel
C) varied
D) mystifying
E) comprehensible

The answer to the first question is in the first paragraph. This excerpt: “Correspondences were used to make the world more  comprehensible .”

2. With which of the following statements concerning the Elizabethan Age would the author be most likely to agree?

A) Elizabethan knowledge about the world had outstripped the capacity of prevailing modes of thought to explain it.

Since Elizabethan mode used both equivalence and metaphor, it could analyze the things that were beyond the capacity of prevailing medieval mode with only realistic mode.

B) Elizabethan knowledge had not developed to the point where it would require a scientific revolution to explain new facts.

“scientific revolution” is out of scope. Not provided by passage.

C) The Elizabethan Age was more interested in creating a scientific image of the world than in depicting the world poetically.

The passage said nothing about Elizabethan  Age . “poetically” is out of scope. Not provided by passage.

D) The Elizabethan Age allowed knowledge about the world to develop gradually and was not surprised by new or strange information.

“was not surprised” is out scope. Not provided by passage.

E) Elizabethans continued to think of the world in medieval ways despite the accumulation of new and strange information.

The passage says the opposite that Elizabethans were not only realistic.

3. In comparison to modern metaphors, the author finds Elizabethan correspondences to be

A) less realistic because they were based on abstract reasoning

On the contrary, Elizabethans were more realistic. I explained this above when sorted out the third paragraph above. “More realistic because based on  abstract  reasoning” makes no sense. It could be more realistic if were based on  facts .

B) more elaborate because they were used only on formal occasions

“more elaborate” and “only” are out of scope. Not provided in the passage.

C) less figurative because they were felt to explain an objective relationship

I explained why it’s C when sorted out the third paragraph above.

D) more closely attuned to the period in which they originated

“attuned to the period” is out of scope. Not provided in the passage.

E) more precise because they were based on mathematical models

“more precise” is out scope. Not provided in the passage.

4.The author implies medieval correspondences were more than mere figures of speech because they

The question may confuse you. “mere figures of speech” means “just words” or “just blah blah and nothing serious”. So, why medieval correspondences were more than just words?

A) were laden with historical associations

“historical associations” is out of scope. Not provided in the passage.

B) were used in a wide variety of contexts

Medieval correspondences could be used wide variety of contexts, but this doesn’t explain why they were more than just words. Even if they were just words, they could be used in any context.

C) enabled medieval people to grasp new ideas

Medieval correspondences could help to learn new things, but this doesn’t explain why they were more than just words. Even if they were just words, they could help learn new things.

D) enabled medieval thinkers to base their faith in an ordered universe on an endless accumulation of minutiae

This choice is directly supported by the second paragraph. This paragraph says Elizabethans were different from the medieval in that they didn’t base their faith on endless accumulation of minutiae. This means that the medieval, on the contrary, based their faith on such accumulation.

E) expressed what were thought to be figurative relationships between abstract qualities

On the contrary, the medieval didn’t express figurative relationships. Elizabethans did.

mimishyu · Answer

para1
to introduce, as an expression and concept, the method of correspondence in medieval time and how, by metaphor, can it be function as the prelude of the whole passage

para2
shift the time background from medieval to Elizabethan and by this start to look at the feature of Elizabethan correspondence, which, though it include in detail as well as order, its divergent also not minutiae mathematical equivalence to the of medieval people while just can be said they present it in its own expression

para3
use an metaphor which better illustrate how Elizabethan balance themselves between emotional metaphor and mathematical equivalence in its own way of expression

para4
comment on the correspondence method employed by Elizabethans, though not perfect in itself, at least useful in the way that expression is somehow familiar to themselves as the ending of the whole passage

1. The author implies that the purpose of  medieval correspondences  was to make the world more

A) intense
B) novel
C) varied
D) mystifying
E) comprehensible...correct

the first paragraph
Correspondences were a method of thought and expression used originally in the Middle Ages to compare two different things on the basis of some perceived similarity in the order of their beings.  Correspondences were used to make the world more comprehensible ; for example, when lute playing was likened to the harmony or discord of the political organization to make both music and politics appear to be part of a congruent set of worldly phenomena.

2. With which of the following statements concerning the Elizabethan Age would the author be most likely to agree?

A) Elizabethan knowledge about the world had outstripped the capacity of prevailing modes of thought to explain it.

…this one be the correct one in OA, however
indeed in para2 the passage says it is not easy to unravel the feelings of the Elizabethans, but its just “feelings” rather than knowledge of the world, besides, para4 states that Elizabethan could somehow interpret the detail, and if it cannot perfectly do this, at least they can grasp their expression themselves, so how can the knowledge of Elizabethan beyond words to explain?

B) Elizabethan knowledge had not developed to the point where it would require a scientific revolution to explain new facts.

nowhere in the passage talks about scientific revolution

C) The Elizabethan Age was more interested in creating a scientific image of the world than in depicting the world poetically.

wrong, para3 says the Elizabethan was quite balance between emotional and rational expression

D) The Elizabethan Age allowed knowledge about the world to develop gradually and was not surprised by new or strange 
information.

…I choose this one as the correct answer choice
I don’t know whether my thinking is correct or not, as I thought that, though not perfect, however this one match somehow the last paragraph says
It was through their retention of the main points and their flexibility in interpreting the details that the Elizabethans were able to use these correspondences in their attempt to  tame a bursting and pullulating world (develop gradually).  Even if they could not tame a new fact by fitting it into a rigid scheme, at least they could grasp it by finding that it was like something already familiar. ( was not surprised by new or strange information.)

E) Elizabethans continued to think of the world in medieval ways despite the accumulation of new and strange information.

para2 clearly states, though resemblance, there still pose subtle difference between medieval and Elizabethan correspondence

3. In comparison to modern metaphors, the author finds Elizabethan correspondences to be

A) less realistic because they were based on abstract reasoning

we know from para3 that Elizabethan correspondences take emotional metaphors as well as rational equivalence together, it doesn’t mention anything about how it based or whether it is realistic or not

B) more elaborate because they were used only on formal occasions

the passage doesn’t say anything about whether Elizabethan correspondences can be used between formal or informal occasion

C) less figurative because they were felt to explain an objective relationship

my thinking as below
from the last sentence of para2:
 They made the imagination use details for its own ends; equivalences shaded off into resemblances. 
so its obvious from these lines that they won’t be “less figurative(which means imaginary)”

or think about that if the correspondence is concrete，practical and not involved much imaginary, which is to say-less figurative in 
itself?para3 says it can balance between math equivalence-rational and metaphor-emotional very well, thus it can’t be only “less 
figurative” as we already know that The Elizabethans could take the matter both ways.

so…how can (C) be the correct answer?

D) more closely attuned to the period in which they originated

from para1 we know the period the correspondence originated is in medieval time, however, para2 states that the expression method Elizabethan employed is divergent from its original medieval one, so there must be no attuned happen here

E) more precise because they were based on mathematical models

…. “based on mathematical models”, indeed para2 mention about mathematical equivalence, then follow by this says Elizabethan become less apt to the minutiae expression of these equivalence, also nowhere talks about the math model it based, this one can’t be correct

4. The author implies medieval correspondences were more than mere figures of speech because they

A) were laden with historical associations

medieval time, from the time point of view, can be historical compare to Elizabethan era, but nowhere in the passage touch on the issue of “historical association”

B) were used in a wide variety of contexts

….this should be Elizabethan correspondences

C) enabled medieval people to grasp new ideas
 
 I choose (C) as that, to break down the former part of para1
correspondences were a method of thought and expression used 
originally in the Middle Ages to compare two different things on the 
basis of some perceived similarity in the order of their beings.
….this is the original purpose to the Medieval correspondence, and 
beyond this, thought of why Medieval correspondence were more 
than this-of figures of speech(1)

correspondences were used to make the world more 
comprehensible…this is another purpose to the original one of 
Medieval correspondence, and it offer a plausible reason in that it 
can be the cause to the above question(1)

thus from the logic point of view, wouldn’t (C) be the correct answer?

D) enabled medieval thinkers to base their faith in an ordered universe on an endless accumulation of minutiae

(D) is the correct answer, however…

para2
On the other hand, it was becoming more difficult for Elizabethans to understand their world as part of a rigid, coherent order: the mathematical detail of correspondences became less apt; in contrast to medieval people, Elizabethans could not base their faith on the endless accumulation of minutiae. At the same time, they desired order.

…..we know from para2 that Elizabethans could not base their faith on the endless accumulation of minutiae, but how can we, by this, infer that this enable medieval thinkers also do the same thing?

if we deem, as from the meaning point of view, the word figures of speech equal to metaphor
para3
This Elizabethan hovering between equivalence and metaphor may become clearer in an example. Modern astronomers, hating the asteroids for being so many and so obstructive, have named them the vermin of the sky.  This expression is no more than a metaphor with emotional content.  To the Middle Ages this observation would have been a highly significant fact, a new piece of evidence for the unity of creation. The Elizabethans could take the matter both ways.

….this part of paragraph says that medieval correspondences were more than mere figures of speech(metaphor), but it doesn’t offer any definite cause which lead to this effect

E) expressed what were thought to be figurative relationships between abstract qualities

“abstract qualities” is out of scope

Russ19 · Answer

GMATNinja ,  MartyTargetTestPrep ,  JonShukhrat ,  GMATGuruNY ,  AviGutman ,  AndrewN ,  DmitryFarber

Dear experts, I have been benefited from reading your posts. I need your advice on how to deal with hard RC.

I have found the RC above very hard. I didn't catch the meaning of each para. Can anyone please tell the meaning of each paragraph? If you showed how to solve the questions it would be great!

mSKR · Answer

GMATNinja ,  GMATNinjaTwo   VeritasKarishma

For Q2, I am still struggling why A is the answer and D is not the right answer.
 
Your inputs would be helpful

Please suggest

Thanks@

Sajjad1994   coreyander  : Please share official explanation for Q2 for options A and D.
 Sajjad1994

KarishmaB · Answer

The passage doesn't say that they were not surprised by new or strange information. It says that they used to find similarities with something familiar to make it easy to comprehend.

But it does say:
"Elizabethans were able to use these correspondences in their attempt to tame a bursting and pullulating world. Even if they could not tame a new fact by fitting it into a rigid scheme, at least they could grasp it by finding that it was like something already familiar."

So "the bursting and multiplying world with new facts" means their knowledge was increasing ... But they used similarities with familiar things for it to make sense.

So it seems likely that 
"A) Elizabethan knowledge about the world had outstripped the capacity of prevailing modes of thought to explain it."
That is why they needed to find similarities with familiar things.

Hence (A) is correct.

nikitamaheshwari · Answer

VeritasKarishma  ,  GMATNinja  - If you can help explaining each para, it will be really helpful

Thanks
Nikita

GMATNinja · Answer

This passage is tricky! When going through an RC passage, first think about  why  the author wrote each paragraph. What does the author really want the reader to get out of that piece? How does it fit into the passage as a whole? (More on this approach  here .)

From the above analysis of  why  each paragraph was written, you can pull out a few key details about  what  is in the passage.

Here's a breakdown of this passage:

P1:
  WHY  did the author write it:  To define a concept and describe how it was used. 
  WHAT concept? "Correspondences," which compare two things. 
 People used correspondences to "to make the world more comprehensible."

P2:
  WHY :  To contrast how people of two time periods used the concept introduced in P1 
  How did they contrast? In the Middle Ages, correspondences were more mathematical/equivalent, in the Elizabethan time they were more metaphorical

P3:
  WHY :  To give an example of the contrast from P2 
  WHAT example? A modern metaphor. People in the Middle Ages would have taken it literally, while Elizabethans would have taken it "both ways" (literally and metaphorically).

P4:
  WHY :  To explain the impact of the change discussed in P2 
  WHAT impact? Because Elizabethans were less rigid with correspondences, they were able to use correspondences to understand their rapidly expanding world.

From the above, you can pull out the author's primary purpose of writing the passage: to explain how the concept of correspondences changed from the Middle Ages to the Elizabethan time, and to discuss the impact of that change.

I hope that helps!

Anki2609 · Answer

Hi Andrew and everyone else in forum.
Regarding the question : 
Hello, sjuniv32. Let me begin by asking, where did you first encounter this question? (Was it on this site, or somewhere else?) 
I am not sure if it is answered. But this passage is from GMAT Prep Question Pack -2.
I have also found this very difficult.

Any insights by expert is GMAT passages are becoming more difficult.

AndrewN · Answer

Hello,  Anki2609 . I am not sure if that last line was meant to be a question, but if so, I do not think RC passages are getting any tougher. When I see some older passages from the paper tests that were five or six paragraphs long and had eight or nine questions attached, I consider myself lucky that passages these days tend to be shorter and include half as many questions. Some passages will prove more challenging than others to any given individual. Someone else might find this passage easy but then stumble on a science passage that you find less challenging. That is just the nature of reading.

Thank you for clarifying the source. (I see that someone fixed the tags to indicate a single source.)

- Andrew

GMATNinja · Answer

The questions featured in Question Pack 2 aren't new at all -- they're retired questions, some of which appeared in pre-2002 editions of the official guide or in the old paper tests from the 1990s. So if you find the QP2 questions to be unusually funky, you probably don't need to lose any sleep over them.

More broadly: the GMAT is a standardized exam, and the whole point is that it's possible to compare scores for people who take the exam years apart. In other words, a 700 in 2017 means the same thing as a 700 in 2022. Rumors periodically circulate that the test is "getting harder", but that simply isn't ever the case -- the exam is the same as it's been for a very, very long time. Obviously, some passages and questions are harder than others, but those differences in difficulty are baked into the scoring algorithm, anyway. I hope that helps a bit!

YashYashkratos · Answer

is the vocabulary seen in the passage common in gmat questions - all official questions i have come across have a more simpler approach on the vocabulary and a more complex one on comprehension.

source?

GMATNinja · Answer

This is apparently a passage from the mba.com online question packs (thanks to  HSWorNothing  for remembering where this one can be found!). So it's a legit, official passage that presumably appeared on actual GMAT exams.

Generally speaking, the GMAT does tend to avoid overly complex vocabulary. That said, you'll inevitably struggle on occasion. When that happens, do you best to figure out the meaning given the context and then move on! Even if you aren't sure about that one little detail, you should, hopefully, still be able to figure out the overall structure and purpose of the passage.

I hope that helps a bit!

VerbalBot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.

Correspondences were a method of thought and expression used

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Reading Comprehension (RC) Questions

Correspondences were a method of thought and expression used

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards