Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 1612:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
You’re first to know: Save $200 on GMAT prep starting tomorrow, 4/13. Get 6 official practice tests and study with real questions. Be ready to save!
Apr 2212:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
26 Apr 2025, 05:13
Kudos
Bookmarks
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
45%
(medium)
Question Stats:
66% (01:34) correct
34%
(01:50)
wrong
based on 417
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Since motorbikes less than 150 cc are worthless to speedsters, the State Transport Officer plans to reduce the number of accidents committed by the 18-21 age group by restricting them to drive motorbikes less than 150 cc.
The State Transport Officer (STO) assumes that ...
(A) Some experts find motorbikes less than 150 cc are not less prone to causing accidents than motorbikes more than 150 cc.
(B) Speedsters drive all types of motorbikes—less than 150 cc and more than 150 cc.
(C) All motorbikes more than 150 cc have disk-brakes that come standard, inducing speed-sters to drive fast.
(D) Imposing fixed penalty tickets on speedsters will decrease the number of accidents they commit.
(E) Speedsters do not drive motorbikes that are worthless to them.
The State Transport Officer (STO) assumes that ...
(A) Some experts find motorbikes less than 150 cc are not less prone to causing accidents than motorbikes more than 150 cc.
(B) Speedsters drive all types of motorbikes—less than 150 cc and more than 150 cc.
(C) All motorbikes more than 150 cc have disk-brakes that come standard, inducing speed-sters to drive fast.
(D) Imposing fixed penalty tickets on speedsters will decrease the number of accidents they commit.
(E) Speedsters do not drive motorbikes that are worthless to them.
26 Apr 2025, 05:38
Kudos
Bookmarks
OA:
Argument construction
The State Transport Officer plans to reduce the number of accidents committed by the 18-21 age group by restricting them to drive motorbikes less than 150 cc.
Premise: Motorbikes less than 150 cc are worthless to speedsters.
Conclusion: Restricting the 18-21 age group to drive motorbikes less than 150 cc will reduce the number of accidents they commit.
We can predict the following assumptions based on the premise and the conclusion:
Based on the premise—motorbikes less than 150 cc are worthless to speedsters, the STO plans to restrict the 18-21 age group to drive motorbikes less than 150 cc so that the number of accidents they cause will be reduced. It implies that the STO assumes that speedsters find motorbikes more than 150 cc worth driving.
Predictive Assumption 1: Speedsters find motorbikes more than 150 cc worth driving. Another assumption may be that the STO targets the 18-21 age group. It implies that the STO assumes that most speedsters fall in the 18-21 age group.
Predictive Assumption 2: Most speedsters fall in the 18-21 age group.
The STO also assumes that by imposing a restriction on the 18-21 age group, the youth will comply with it.
Predictive Assumption 3: Speedsters will obey the restriction imposed on them.
Last but not least—the STO assumes that motorbikes less than 150 cc are less prone to causing accidents than motorbikes more than 150 cc.
Predictive Assumption 4: Motorbikes less than 150 cc are less prone to causing accidents than motorbikes more than 150 cc .
(A) This option is inconclusive. ‘Some’ is a tricky quantity word. In the real world, we may equate ‘Some’ to a significant number, but in the GMAT, ‘Some’ may range from anything between 0% to 100%; 0 is excluded, hence it is inconclusive. Had ‘some’ been replaced with ‘many,’ probably the statement would have qualified to be an assumption.
(B) This option is inconsistent. It goes against the premise. No one can challenge the premise, even if in the real world, the opposite may seem true. The premise already states that motorbikes less than 150 cc are worthless to speedsters, hence option C is against the premise, as it states that speedsters drive all types of motorbikes including those less than 150 cc (worthless).
(C) This option is irrelevant. Why speedsters drive fast is not relevant.
(D) This option is out of scope. The penalty aspect is outside the scope of the argument.
(E) This is the correct answer. It is aligned with predictive assumption 1.
The correct answer is option E.
Argument construction
The State Transport Officer plans to reduce the number of accidents committed by the 18-21 age group by restricting them to drive motorbikes less than 150 cc.
Premise: Motorbikes less than 150 cc are worthless to speedsters.
Conclusion: Restricting the 18-21 age group to drive motorbikes less than 150 cc will reduce the number of accidents they commit.
We can predict the following assumptions based on the premise and the conclusion:
Based on the premise—motorbikes less than 150 cc are worthless to speedsters, the STO plans to restrict the 18-21 age group to drive motorbikes less than 150 cc so that the number of accidents they cause will be reduced. It implies that the STO assumes that speedsters find motorbikes more than 150 cc worth driving.
Predictive Assumption 1: Speedsters find motorbikes more than 150 cc worth driving. Another assumption may be that the STO targets the 18-21 age group. It implies that the STO assumes that most speedsters fall in the 18-21 age group.
Predictive Assumption 2: Most speedsters fall in the 18-21 age group.
The STO also assumes that by imposing a restriction on the 18-21 age group, the youth will comply with it.
Predictive Assumption 3: Speedsters will obey the restriction imposed on them.
Last but not least—the STO assumes that motorbikes less than 150 cc are less prone to causing accidents than motorbikes more than 150 cc.
Predictive Assumption 4: Motorbikes less than 150 cc are less prone to causing accidents than motorbikes more than 150 cc .
(A) This option is inconclusive. ‘Some’ is a tricky quantity word. In the real world, we may equate ‘Some’ to a significant number, but in the GMAT, ‘Some’ may range from anything between 0% to 100%; 0 is excluded, hence it is inconclusive. Had ‘some’ been replaced with ‘many,’ probably the statement would have qualified to be an assumption.
(B) This option is inconsistent. It goes against the premise. No one can challenge the premise, even if in the real world, the opposite may seem true. The premise already states that motorbikes less than 150 cc are worthless to speedsters, hence option C is against the premise, as it states that speedsters drive all types of motorbikes including those less than 150 cc (worthless).
(C) This option is irrelevant. Why speedsters drive fast is not relevant.
(D) This option is out of scope. The penalty aspect is outside the scope of the argument.
(E) This is the correct answer. It is aligned with predictive assumption 1.
The correct answer is option E.
29 Apr 2025, 09:25
Kudos
Bookmarks
I dont think the option A would have been correct even if the word "Many" was used instead of 'Some".
The reason being even if - "All the experts find motorbikes less than 150 cc are not less prone to causing accidents than motorbikes more than 150 cc."
Would mean M.B < 150cc = MB >150cc in causing accidents , which is kind of challenging the premise and eventually the conclusion does not hold good.
An assumption along with the premise leads to the conclusion.
Please let me know your thoughts.
The reason being even if - "All the experts find motorbikes less than 150 cc are not less prone to causing accidents than motorbikes more than 150 cc."
Would mean M.B < 150cc = MB >150cc in causing accidents , which is kind of challenging the premise and eventually the conclusion does not hold good.
An assumption along with the premise leads to the conclusion.
Please let me know your thoughts.
