It is currently 21 Oct 2017, 00:08

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Pamela: Business has an interest in enabling employees to

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 148

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Feb 2008, 05:19
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Pamela: Business has an interest in enabling employees to care for children, because those children will be the customers, employees, and managers of the future. Therefore, businesses should adopt policies, such as day-care benefits that facilitate parenting.

Lee: No individual company, though, will be patronized, staffed, and managed only by its own employees’ children, so it would not be to a company’s advantage to provide such benefits to employees’ children when other companies do not.

In which one of the following pairs consisting of argument and objection does the objection function most similarly to the way Lee’s objection functions in relation to Pamela’s argument?

(A) New roads will not serve to relieve this area’s traffic congestion, because new roads would encourage new construction and generate additional traffic.
Objection: Failure to build new roads would mean that traffic congestion would strangle the area even earlier.
(B) Humanity needs clean air to breathe, so each person should make an effort avoid polluting the air.
Objection: The air one person breathes is affected mainly by pollution caused by others, so it makes no sense to act alone to curb air pollution.
(C) Advertised discounts on products draw customers’ attention to the products， so advertised discounts benefit sales.
(D) If people always told lies, then no one would know what the truth was, so people should always tell the truth.
Objection: If people always told lies, then everyone would know that the truth was the opposite of what was said.
(E) Human social institutions have always changed. So even if we do not know what those changes will be, we do know that the social institutions of the future will differ from those of the past.
Objection: The existence of change in the past does not ensure that there will always be change in the future.

Explanation pls.
_________________

Neelabh Mahesh

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3584

Kudos [?]: 4587 [0], given: 360

Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40

### Show Tags

05 Feb 2008, 06:42
B is the best. one <---> many.
_________________

HOT! GMAT TOOLKIT 2 (iOS) / GMAT TOOLKIT (Android) - The OFFICIAL GMAT CLUB PREP APP, a must-have app especially if you aim at 700+ | PrepGame

Kudos [?]: 4587 [0], given: 360

Manager
Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 114

Kudos [?]: 33 [1], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Feb 2008, 07:07
1
KUDOS
B...I think

The objection relates to the concept of moral delimma or the 'issue of commons'. the cost of acting is concentrated in the actor but the benefits are diffused throughout the society so why should I act. B is the only one that has the same issue.

Kudos [?]: 33 [1], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2008
Posts: 157

Kudos [?]: 132 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Feb 2008, 02:32
Will go with B

--

Objection in bold:

Lee: No individual company, though, will be patronized, staffed, and managed only by its own employees’ children, so it would not be to a company’s advantage to provide such benefits to employees’ children when other companies do not. - Company needs employees' children to flourish in future, so take care of those children now

(B) Humanity needs clean air to breathe, so each person should make an effort avoid polluting the air.
Objection: The air one person breathes is affected mainly by pollution caused by others, so it makes no sense to act alone to curb air pollution. - Humanity needs clean air, so individual should make en effort.

Kudos [?]: 132 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2734

Kudos [?]: 1049 [0], given: 4

Location: New York City

### Show Tags

06 Feb 2008, 08:12
clear B.

as any business major/banker would know , the arguement talks about externalities and who should take the burden to shoulder the costs.
_________________

You tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is 'never try'. -Homer Simpson

Kudos [?]: 1049 [0], given: 4

Director
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Posts: 781

Kudos [?]: 182 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Feb 2008, 22:16
The objection to Pamela’s argument by Lee is based on fact that it is not advantageous to provide benefits if other companies are not providing to its employees. That is, if collective effort is not performed, no point in doing this.

(A) New roads will not serve to relieve this area’s traffic congestion, because new roads would encourage new construction and generate additional traffic.
Objection: Failure to build new roads would mean that traffic congestion would strangle the area even earlier. [This is pointing to a cause and effect – eliminate it]

(B) Humanity needs clean air to breathe, so each person should make an effort avoid polluting the air.
Objection: The air one person breathes is affected mainly by pollution caused by others, so it makes no sense to act alone to curb air pollution. [This argument has collective effort – hold it]

(C) Advertised discounts on products draw customers’ attention to the products， so advertised discounts benefit sales.
Objection: Customers already planning to purchase a product accelerate buying to take advantage of advertised discounts, and those subsequent sales suffer.[This is cause and effect – eliminate it]

(D) If people always told lies, then no one would know what the truth was, so people should always tell the truth.
Objection: If people always told lies, then everyone would know that the truth was the opposite of what was said. [This has collective reference, but has no inference of many to one – eliminate it]

(E) Human social institutions have always changed. So even if we do not know what those changes will be, we do know that the social institutions of the future will differ from those of the past.
Objection: The existence of change in the past does not ensure that there will always be change in the future. [This takes about derivation – eliminate it]

Kudos [?]: 182 [0], given: 0

Display posts from previous: Sort by