Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
(A) Mario developed a developed a formula that uses less variables, and therefore easy to use.
(B) Mario developed a developed a formula that uses less variables, and that is easy to use.
Which parallelism is correct to use? (A) in seems to to be logical because the formula is easy to use because it uses less variables is covered in the first stem.
Whereas, in (B): (1) that uses less variables (2) that is easy to use
"Mario developed a developed a formula (2) that is easy to use" in this it is not covering the (1) part which the reason why the "formula" is easy to use. AndrewN
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
(A) Mario developed a developed a formula that uses less variables, and therefore easy to use.
(B) Mario developed a developed a formula that uses less variables, and that is easy to use.
Which parallelism is correct to use? (A) in seems to to be logical because the formula is easy to use because it uses less variables is covered in the first stem.
Whereas, in (B): (1) that uses less variables (2) that is easy to use
"Mario developed a developed a formula (2) that is easy to use" in this it is not covering the (1) part which the reason why the "formula" is easy to use. AndrewN
Show more
These are some strange-looking sentences, lakshya14, each with its own double developed. I should point out, too, that variables are countable, so fewer is more apt than less. Although either sentence could pass for a legitimate one, it would take an overhaul to get it to that point. My rewrites:
A.2) Mario developed a formula that uses fewer variables and is therefore easy to use. (Note the lack of a comma and the addition of is.)
B.2) Mario developed a formula that uses fewer variables and [that] is easy to use. (The that need not be repeated, although it is not incorrect to put it in the sentence. Since the predicate within the embedded clause (the part from the verb on) is relatively short, we can carry over the that as an understood element at the head of the second branch in that X and Y.) If we inserted additional information about, say, the variables, then I would expect to see another that:
B.3) Mario developed a formula that uses fewer variables, greatly improving the efficiency of any software that incorporates it, and that is easy to use.
Without the second that in this last sentence, the reader might anticipate another it instead, and there could seem to be a gap that would prove distracting.
I hope that helps with your query. Thank you for thinking to ask.
- Andrew
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.