Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 08:43 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 08:43
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
IEsailor
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Last visit: 06 Dec 2011
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
1,392
 [29]
Given Kudos: 4
Concentration: Maritime Financial Services
Schools:Columbia, INSEAD, RSM, LBS
Posts: 106
Kudos: 1,392
 [29]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
25
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Onell
Joined: 05 Jan 2011
Last visit: 12 Feb 2012
Posts: 72
Own Kudos:
1,084
 [1]
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 72
Kudos: 1,084
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
DevilDoggNC
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Last visit: 01 Dec 2013
Posts: 133
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Schools:UNC Duke Kellogg
GPA: 3.28
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
GRE 1: Q800 V700
Posts: 133
Kudos: 235
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
jeffjose
Joined: 23 Feb 2013
Last visit: 01 Oct 2015
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 40
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
WE:Engineering (Media/Entertainment)
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
Posts: 25
Kudos: 34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I cant agree with "D" because the argument doesnt talk about "2 processes" at all.

Raw milk drinkers consume the milk as-is - without heating. Since that's the case, there's never a scenario where raw-milk drinkers use "either process alone" - hence wont be put forth as an argument.
avatar
ts30
Joined: 09 Mar 2016
Last visit: 10 Oct 2017
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 14
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jeffjose
I cant agree with "D" because the argument doesnt talk about "2 processes" at all.

Raw milk drinkers consume the milk as-is - without heating. Since that's the case, there's never a scenario where raw-milk drinkers use "either process alone" - hence wont be put forth as an argument.

In my opinion, D is correct because -
1. MOST people who drink milk do not heat at home, so they will not be killing digestive enzymes by heating. This addresses the "beside the point" part of argument.
2. For the SOME people who DO heat milk (because MOST is not = ALL), will be subjecting the milk to 2 processes - pasteurization and heating at home having a dual effect. So, they would rather drink it raw and heat it once. This addresses the "else misleading part" and completes the sentence.
avatar
ravikrishna1979
Joined: 22 Jun 2016
Last visit: 05 Dec 2016
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
14
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 34
Kudos: 14
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
D) Digestive enzymes will be killed during pasteurisation, but never said that when the pasteurisation mil heated still looses some more healthy elements.

B) It clearly says Pasteurisation does not only kill pathogens, it do other tasks like killing digestive enzymes.

B can be inferred, but D is far of from inference and need to add more to get to D.

IMO B should be the answer.
User avatar
warriorguy
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Last visit: 08 Feb 2023
Posts: 377
Own Kudos:
364
 [1]
Given Kudos: 144
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GPA: 4
WE:Engineering (Telecommunications)
Posts: 377
Kudos: 364
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think the question is very cleverly modeled on the lines of "irradiation of food" question from official guide.
User avatar
RanjanSury
Joined: 14 May 2017
Last visit: 11 Jan 2019
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 325
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Education)
Posts: 36
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jeffjose
I cant agree with "D" because the argument doesnt talk about "2 processes" at all.

Raw milk drinkers consume the milk as-is - without heating. Since that's the case, there's never a scenario where raw-milk drinkers use "either process alone" - hence wont be put forth as an argument.

Hi JeffJose.

That was my initial thought as well. But look closely at the following sentence from the passage:-

Proponents of pasteurization point out that that pasteurization is still necessary to reduce bacterial contamination, and that heating milk at home also kills beneficial digestive enzymes.

I think the two processes implied here are pasteurization and heating milk at home.

D
User avatar
vasuca10
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 06 Feb 2016
Last visit: 23 Jul 2022
Posts: 224
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 148
Status:On the journey of achieving
Affiliations: Senior Manager, CA by profession, CFA(USA) Level 2
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Finance
GMAT 1: 560 Q44 V23
GMAT 2: 530 Q39 V24
GMAT 3: 580 Q46 V24 (Online)
GMAT 4: 640 Q50 V26
GPA: 3.82
WE:Other (Commercial Banking)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Experts Mahmud6 mikemcgarry GMATNinja please explain this question........I am not able to understand this question at all
User avatar
Mahmud6
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Last visit: 01 Apr 2026
Posts: 381
Own Kudos:
901
 [1]
Given Kudos: 235
Status:The best is yet to come.....
Posts: 381
Kudos: 901
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vasuca10
Experts Mahmud6 mikemcgarry GMATNinja please explain this question........I am not able to understand this question at all
I will try to help you.

Proponents of pasteurization point out
1. Pasteurization (heating and cooling) is necessary as it reduce bacterial contamination
2. Heating milk at home also kills beneficial digestive enzymes.

Raw milk drinkers argue that this (proponents of pasteurization) argument is
1. Beside the point, i.e., heating is not necessary. How does argument of proponents of pasteurization beside the point of raw milk drinkers? It is beside the point in a way that proponents of pasteurization are saying that heating milk at home also kills beneficial digestive enzymes, but raw milk dinkers are not heating milk at home. So, beneficial digestive enzymes are not killed by raw milk drinkers.

2. Misleading. How does argument of proponents of pasteurization mislead the point of raw milk drinkers? It is misleading in a way that if milk is heated twice, it would destroy more digestive enzymes than either process alone destroys.

A similar question has been discussed here.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,420
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,420
Kudos: 1,009
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
499 posts
358 posts