Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0%
(00:00)
correct 0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 0
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Dear Colleagues.
Please help me with the understanding of CR.
I’m not a native speaker. My problem is that I cannot predict what the assumption should be in the Assumption questions, or what specifically I should strengthen or weaken in the respectful types of questions.
I know the strategies for a different types of questions, I can almost every time identify what is the conclusion and what is (are) premises (evidence), but I flatly cannot understand (or predict) what the answer should be.
After POE usually leave 2 or 3 answers, that require understanding, but I cannot understand. Very simple example from Kaplan to show my problem:
In 2001, a local high school implemented a new program designed to reduce the incidence of teenage pregnancy. The program, however, failed to produce the desired result. If the program had been successful, the dropout rate for female students would not have increased substantially in 2001.
The argument in the passage depends on which of the following assumptions?
A. The number of teen pregnancies nationwide increased in 2001.
B. The number of teen pregnancies in 2001 was greater than the number of teen pregnancies on 1991.
C. Teenage pregnancy is a leading reason that female students leave school.
D. The program was mandatory for all female students.
E. Most 2001 female dropouts were not pregnant at any time during the year.
(Of cause this Q can be done with POE and scope, but not all Qs are like these).
Conclusion: a 2001 school program to reduce teenage pregnancy was a failure.
Evidence: female dropout rate increased during 2001.
Even if I try to think like KISS – I still cannot understand how to assume that “pregnancy is important reason for a female to drop out of schoolâ€
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Dear Friend, the only solution I can suggest is to solve as many questions as possible.
keep visiting this forum more often. I am sure you will come across many good CR questions. And the best thing here is, you will have fun while you learn
Dear Friend, the only solution I can suggest is to solve as many questions as possible.
keep visiting this forum more often. I am sure you will come across many good CR questions. And the best thing here is, you will have fun while you learn
Show more
Exactly, native or not, practice definately improves performance on all aspects of this test.
If CR is your greatest weakness, make it your favorite practice section and source out both the GMAT CR 1000 list and the LSAT CR 1000 list (harder than GMAT CR) and do as many questions as you can. After that you should notice a dramatic improvement in your overall verbal score.
For the assumption questions, if you can't paraphrase then try negating the choices and see if conclusion still holds true. In the question provided, lets try negating choice C:
Teenage pregnancy is NOT a leading reason that female students leave school.
If this is not the leading reason then female students are leaving because of some other reasons and not because of failure of program.
I would suggest to employ strategies given in Princeton Review. They seem to be effective. As said by others, key to success is the "vicious cycle" of practice and learn from mistakes. If you are making same mistakes again then you need to again go to basics.
That was a challenge for me what strategy to use –PR or Kaplan. They are 100% different for me (at this moment). PR looks easier, but with the Kaplan CD doesn’t work (in my case).
I’ll try to practice PR again (even though sometimes I cannot understand is the evidence casual, stat. or analogous) and will practice negating choises.
Thanx again!
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.