CR: Non proliferation

Question

Try this one...

singh · Answer

D. as that show a proper reason for sanctions. OA ??

scorpioguy · Answer

Is it B?

The reasoning is that the countries that propose the sanctions want to do it irrespective of whether the target countries have the WMD.

Choice B is the only one where a proof is requested before sanctions can be imposed.

gamjatang · Answer

(D) goes too far.

I vote for (B).

vc019 · Answer

I vote for 'B'.
D - Out of scope of the argument.

mohish · Answer

OA is B.

I chose D. Since we are talking about preventing 'proliferation' of weapons, D talks about first ensuring whether the countries to be sanctioned indeed have means to proliferate....that was my reasoning. 

B states that it must first be ensured that countries to be sanctioned actually have built weapons...even if they have built weapons, if they don't have the capacity to proliferate (for whatever reason), I thought, it should not be a concern...

CR: Non proliferation

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards