mvictor wrote:
HeadingEast wrote:
I don't believe that. What constitutes smart in the world of MBA applications? your GMAT right. To me the biggest challenge of the GMAT is the time crunch. You have to learn and practice these concepts until you can do them in your sleep. That's the only way to beat the time constraint. The GMAT in my opinion is not about how smart you are but how damn prepared you are. I got a 490 on my first practice test and people told me "you can only improve by 100 points or so beyond that it's just intellect." That's BS. I studied 15 hrs a week for 4 months and got the score I wanted.
Well, I improved on GMAT by 100 points, and I know that it's possible to improve even further...
Nonetheless, looking at my experience, my educational background, and my recent interviews that I have had, I am far away from the guys who apply here.
I can only wish to get to where some of you are right now
p.s. further, I guess I have a fear that even if I get into any b-school, it would turn out that I am not prepared to be in there.
I think its all in your mindset, to be quite honest. For instance, when you say you are not smart enough to get into a top 50, I'm very confused. Schools in the 35 - 50 range have admit rates of 30% and above. Are you saying if you applied to four schools like, say Uni of Georgia, Uni of Rochester, Temple University, etc., and their cumulative admit rates sum up to 100% or more, not one of those would accept you? Is this really how you think, or are you exaggerating? If its really how you think, I'm not sure applying to MBA programs is going help. Not because you're not smart enough, but because you need more confidence. If you're exaggerating, then its best to stop. You're a leader - putting yourself down isn't useful.