Bunuel
Preconceived notions of the world, especially that of the so-called Third World, have colored our perceptions enough to blind us to its true state, illustrated by decades of reliable statistics. The currently prevalent and popular juxtaposition of the struggling Third World and the flourishing First World is consistent with the state of the world in the mid - twentieth century, not the world in which we currently reside. For example, while the richest 20% of the world's population earn 74% of the total income and the poorest 20% earn 2%, the majority of the world's population belongs to a "middle-class", earning 24% of the total income. Most countries, with the exception of those African countries devastated by AIDS, share a relatively high life expectancy and low fertility rate. Child mortality rates in many Asian and South American nations are on par with those of the "developed world"; in fact, the country with the lowest child mortality rate in 2007 was Singapore. Unfortunately, most people's ignorance of these facts and others like them stems from a lack of access to understandable data. Although the data are available, access to statistics is often costly and, even when free access is granted, statistics are presented in a dull fashion, which repels all but the most dedicated.
Which of the following would most weaken the author's statement that reliable statistics illustrate the true state of the world?
(A) Statistics show averages which blur the complex nature of the state of any country.
(B) Statistics have been available for every country in the world for many years.
(C) Statistics from countries considered to be part of the Third World are of the same quality as those gathered in First World countries.
(D)The general public is not interested in analyzing statistics.
(E) Gathering statistics is more time consuming and expensive in some countries than in others.
Main Idea: Statistics are reliable but do they or don't they convey the true picture?Question type: Weaken
A. This option doesn't attack the fact - whether statistics are correct. It correctly attacks whether they are reliable - that is are they showing us true on-the ground picture. It gives new information by saying because statistics are complex it can be hard to interpret one way or the other. Correct answer.
B - This is just giving us repeat info. We are told statistics have been available for decades so nothing new and certainly not weaking point.
C - This option is casting doubt on the quality of the statistics. You could say that is creating a doubt by asking whether the statistics are correct or not? This is not the right choice because it is attacking a premise/fact. We are told that these are reliable statistics, this is not an opinion but a fact. So, cannot be the correct answer.
D - Out of scope. It has nothing to do with Statistics per say.
E - It doesn't come near to the main idea of reliability, quality, etc. Therefore, incorrect.
Therefore,
option A is the correct answer.
Posted from my mobile device