It is currently 19 Apr 2018, 19:42

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

President: Over the last twenty years, the army’s funding

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 278
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, Other
GPA: 2.44
WE: Project Management (Telecommunications)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
President: Over the last twenty years, the army’s funding [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 10 Aug 2013, 01:21
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

78% (01:12) correct 22% (01:39) wrong based on 182 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

President: Over the last twenty years, the army’s funding was cut four times. Each time, the high command predicted that those cuts would impair our defense capability. Nevertheless, recent military exercises proved them wrong. Therefore, even if we continue to cut the army’s budget, the army will be able to decrease its expenditure without reducing defense capability.

Which of the following, if true, best supports the argument above?
(A)
High command does not usually overestimate the consequences of budget cuts.
(B)The army currently spends significant amounts on activities that are not necessary for maintaining defense capability.
(C)Several politicians consider that further cutting of the army’s budget will have negative effects other than decreasing defense capability.
(D)Switching to an all-volunteer army will improve defense capability.
(E)Some military expenditure not connected with maintaining defense capability has not increased since the last cut of the army’s budget.

OA to follow
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Originally posted by guerrero25 on 09 Aug 2013, 20:59.
Last edited by guerrero25 on 10 Aug 2013, 01:21, edited 1 time in total.
1 KUDOS received
VP
VP
User avatar
Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1101
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: President: Over the last twenty years, the army’s funding [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Aug 2013, 00:34
1
This post received
KUDOS
Which of the following, if true, best supports the argument above?
(A)High command does not usually overestimate the consequences of budget cuts.
The fact that the high command overestimate or not the consequences does not support the argument at all.
(B)The army currently spends significant amounts on activities that are not necessary for maintaining defense capability.
IMO CORRECT. If B is true, then the army can continue with the cuts, and not hurt the defense capability (because "significant amounts on activities that are not necessary") .
(C)Several politicians consider that further cutting of the army’s budget will have negative effects other than decreasing defense capability.
The opinion of politicians is not relevant.
(D)Switching to an all-volunteer army will improve defense capability.
We are not trying to find another solution to the problem, but to evaluate the current one.
(E)Some military expenditure not connected with maintaining defense capability has not increased since the last cut of the army’s budget.
E could seem good. but: it's too general ("some expenditure") => we don't know how much expenditure, so it would be hard to say that those can be cut; this fact as it is, is not strictly connected to the argument.
_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Kant , Critique of Pure Reason

Tips and tricks: Inequalities , Mixture | Review: MGMAT workshop
Strategy: SmartGMAT v1.0 | Questions: Verbal challenge SC I-II- CR New SC set out !! , My Quant

Rules for Posting in the Verbal Forum - Rules for Posting in the Quant Forum[/size][/color][/b]

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 812
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: President: Over the last twenty years, the army’s funding [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Aug 2013, 01:21
guerrero25 wrote:
President: Over the last twenty years, the army’s funding was cut four times. Each time, the high command predicted that those cuts would impair our defense capability. Nevertheless, recent military exercises proved them wrong. Therefore, even if we continue to cut the army’s budget, the army will be able to decrease its expenditure without reducing defense capability.

Which of the following, if true, best supports the argument above?
(A)
High command does not usually overestimate the consequences of budget cuts.
(B)The army currently spends significant amounts on activities that are not necessary for maintaining defense capability.
(C)Several politicians consider that further cutting of the army’s budget will have negative effects other than decreasing defense capability.
(D)Switching to an all-volunteer army will improve defense capability.
(E)Some military expenditure not connected with maintaining defense capability has not increased since the last cut of the army’s budget.

OA to follow


IMO B
CONCLUSION:THE army will be able to decrease its expenditure without reducing defense capability.
ASSUMPTION: ARMY hasmorethan sufficient money.

B clearly says so:The army currently spends significant amounts on activities that are not necessary for maintaining defense capability.

hence this clearly strengthens.
_________________

When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe ...then you will be successfull....

GIVE VALUE TO OFFICIAL QUESTIONS...



GMAT RCs VOCABULARY LIST: http://gmatclub.com/forum/vocabulary-list-for-gmat-reading-comprehension-155228.html
learn AWA writing techniques while watching video : http://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-analytical-writing-assessment
: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APt9ITygGss

Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 2725
Premium Member
Re: President: Over the last twenty years, the army’s funding [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Mar 2018, 06:26
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: President: Over the last twenty years, the army’s funding   [#permalink] 14 Mar 2018, 06:26
Display posts from previous: Sort by

President: Over the last twenty years, the army’s funding

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.