Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 21:39 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 21:39
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
rxs0005
Joined: 07 Jun 2004
Last visit: 21 Jun 2017
Posts: 436
Own Kudos:
3,309
 [1]
Given Kudos: 22
Location: PA
Posts: 436
Kudos: 3,309
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
shrouded1
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Last visit: 29 Apr 2018
Posts: 608
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 25
Location: London
Products:
Posts: 608
Kudos: 3,230
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
shrouded1
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Last visit: 29 Apr 2018
Posts: 608
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 25
Location: London
Products:
Posts: 608
Kudos: 3,230
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
gurpreetsingh
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Last visit: 15 Jun 2019
Posts: 2,266
Own Kudos:
3,962
 [1]
Given Kudos: 235
Status:<strong>Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.</strong>
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: ISB '15 (M)
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Products:
Schools: ISB '15 (M)
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Posts: 2,266
Kudos: 3,962
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think if a number is a prime, then it is always of the form 6k+1 and 6k-1.

But a non prime number could also be of the form 6k+1 and 6k-1.

So the causality is one way only.
User avatar
rxs0005
Joined: 07 Jun 2004
Last visit: 21 Jun 2017
Posts: 436
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 22
Location: PA
Posts: 436
Kudos: 3,309
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
thanks the causality direction helped
User avatar
mainhoon
Joined: 18 Jul 2010
Last visit: 10 Oct 2013
Posts: 532
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
Status:Apply - Last Chance
Affiliations: IIT, Purdue, PhD, TauBetaPi
Concentration: $ Finance $
Schools:Wharton, Sloan, Chicago, Haas
GPA: 4.0
WE 1: 8 years in Oil&amp;Gas
Posts: 532
Kudos: 397
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shrouded1
Some Trivia

There is a long standing mathematical conjecture called the twin prime conjecture, which states that there are infinitely many twin primes (primes with a difference of 2 between them).

You can't put any conditions on n for the form 6n-1 & 6n+1 to be prime (or almost all of them to be prime), because if you could, you would also end up proving the twin prime conjecture, which has been an outstanding open problem for over a 100 years

Is it one of those 1M$ problems to be solved? Well solve this one and forget about GMAT or MBA.. Relax in piece.. !

Btw, what would be the proof of 6k-1 or 6k+1, it looks like primes are of this form (trial and error), with the restriction gurpreet pointed out..
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,785
Own Kudos:
810,886
 [2]
Given Kudos: 105,857
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,785
Kudos: 810,886
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mainhoon
shrouded1
Some Trivia

There is a long standing mathematical conjecture called the twin prime conjecture, which states that there are infinitely many twin primes (primes with a difference of 2 between them).

You can't put any conditions on n for the form 6n-1 & 6n+1 to be prime (or almost all of them to be prime), because if you could, you would also end up proving the twin prime conjecture, which has been an outstanding open problem for over a 100 years

Is it one of those 1M$ problems to be solved? Well solve this one and forget about GMAT or MBA.. Relax in piece.. !

Btw, what would be the proof of 6k-1 or 6k+1, it looks like primes are of this form (trial and error), with the restriction gurpreet pointed out..

Any prime number \(p>3\) when divided by 6 can only give remainder of 1 or 5 (remainder can not be 2 or 4 as in this case \(p\) would be even and remainder can not be 3 as in this case \(p\) would be divisible by 3).

So any prime number \(p>3\) could be expressed as \(p=6n+1\) or\(p=6n+5\) or \(p=6n-1\), where n is an integer >1.

Hope it helps.
User avatar
shrouded1
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Last visit: 29 Apr 2018
Posts: 608
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 25
Location: London
Products:
Posts: 608
Kudos: 3,230
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mainhoon

Is it one of those 1M$ problems to be solved? Well solve this one and forget about GMAT or MBA.. Relax in piece.. !

Nope, its not. Those $1M ones aren't that straight forward to understand generally

Mathematicians are strange. A couple of years ago, a Russian guy solved one of these problems and refused to take the prize money.
User avatar
amanvermagmat
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Last visit: 28 Mar 2025
Posts: 1,142
Own Kudos:
2,973
 [2]
Given Kudos: 480
Location: India
Posts: 1,142
Kudos: 2,973
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
While we are talking about prime numbers, there is another general rule for identifying whether a positive integer 'N' is prime or not:

Take square root of N, and if its not an integer, round it down to nearest integer. Let that integer be M. Now divide N by all the prime numbers between 1 and M exclusive, and if its NOT divisible by either of those, then N must be prime.

Eg, lets see if 199 and 299 are prime or not. Lets start with 199.
Square root of 199 when rounded down to nearest integer = 14 (14^2 = 196).
Now we should check if 199 is divisible by any prime number between 1 and 14.. these prime numbers are 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13.
199 is NOT divisible by any of these - hence 199 is prime.

Lets now look at 299. Square root of 299 rounded down to nearest integer = 17 (17^2 = 289).
Now we should check if 299 is divisible by any prime number between 1 and 17.. these prime numbers are 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13.
But 299 is Divisible by 13. (13*23).. we found a factor - hence 299 is NOT prime
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,963
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,963
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.

Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!