Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 21:22 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 21:22
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
tyagel
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Last visit: 06 Jan 2005
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
Posts: 28
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ian7777
Joined: 09 Mar 2003
Last visit: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 227
Own Kudos:
Posts: 227
Kudos: 178
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
tyagel
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Last visit: 06 Jan 2005
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
Posts: 28
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ian7777
Joined: 09 Mar 2003
Last visit: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 227
Own Kudos:
Posts: 227
Kudos: 178
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
absolutely. but notice that it's divisible by 3 and 9. So no matter what, it wouldn't be prime. And if you weren't sure what to do with it, it breaks down to prime factors 3x3x7x7, which is 3x7x3x7, which is 21x21. So you can always figure it out just that way on the test.
User avatar
Dan
Joined: 28 Aug 2004
Last visit: 23 Feb 2006
Posts: 129
Own Kudos:
Posts: 129
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
For a quick way to see whether a number is prime, check whether the number is divisible by prime numbers up to the square root of the number (by using divisibility rules).

As an example, say the number you're trying to crack is 461. You need to check all primes up to 19.

Try 2 (first prime): no, not even.
3: no, sum of the numbers not divisible by 3.
5: no, doesn't end with 0 or 5.
7: alternating + or - signs don't end up in number divisible by 7.
11, 13, 17, and 19: easy and don't work either.

So the number is prime. It is a generalization that can be applied to the problem in less than 2 minutes. Get away as much as you can from trial and error - it wastes time and consumes you.

You should also know why we aren't trying numbers like 4, 6, 8...and how we get to the 19 prime limit figure (in this example).
User avatar
twixt
Joined: 31 Aug 2004
Last visit: 03 Jul 2015
Posts: 283
Own Kudos:
Posts: 283
Kudos: 404
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dan,

Could you please explain your trick for the divisible by 7 numbers ?
I tried to make a list like this with the help of hardworker but did not gather any trick for 7 ...
User avatar
Dan
Joined: 28 Aug 2004
Last visit: 23 Feb 2006
Posts: 129
Own Kudos:
Posts: 129
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
twixt, as to the trick for 7,

from the right, group the digits by threes, and mark the groups positive and negative alternately, and then total the signed groups; is the resulting sum divisible by 7?

say the number is 147,809 and you want to see whether it is divisible by 7.


+809 - 147 = 662; 662/7 is not an integer, then 147,809/7 is not either.
User avatar
twixt
Joined: 31 Aug 2004
Last visit: 03 Jul 2015
Posts: 283
Own Kudos:
Posts: 283
Kudos: 404
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thank you Dan !

Nice trick.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!