Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
I've got a probability question from my Princeton Math Workout book that I don't quite get the logic of. It reads:
Three children, John, Paul, and Ringo, are playing a game. Each child will choose either the number 1 or the number 2. When one child chooses a number different from those of the other two children, he is declared the winner. If all of the children choose the same number, the process repeats until one child is declared the winner. If Ringo always chooses 2 and the other children select the numbers randomly, what is the probability that Ringo is declared the winner?
I came up with 1/4. Since Ringo is always going to pick 2, it seems like we have the following possibilities:
John: 1 Paul: 1 (Ringo wins)
John: 1 Paul: 2 (John wins)
John: 2 Paul: 2 (no winner)
John: 2 Paul: 1 (Paul winner)
So there are four possible outcomes, one of which involves Ringo winning.
The books says the answer is 1/3, though. It seems to be excluding the possibility of there being no winner at all. Here's its explanation:
Quote:
The best way to think about this question is to focus on the final round, the one in which two children choose one number and one child chooses the other, so that there is a winner. It really doesn't matter whether this is the first round or the hundredth, the probabilities will come out the same. In this final round, there are three possibilities: Ringo chooses 2 while John and Paul both choose 1; Ringo and John choose 2 while Paul chooses 1; and Ringo and Paul choose 2 while John Chooses 1. Each of the three possibilities is equally likely, and Ringo wins in only one of them, so the probability that he wins is 1/3.
Show more
So, I don't know which logic to follow. I understand what the book is saying--that if there's a winner, the odds are 1 out of 3 that it will be Ringo. But there's no guarantee that there will be a winner at all; there's a 1 out of 4 chance that there won't be. And that would change Ringo's odds of winning from 1/3 to 1/4.
Is this sort of confusion typical of a real GMAT question?
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Question is asking when finally Ringo do Win. So for Winning (anyone of them wins) there is only 3 possible ways and nothing else.
Show more
But the question asks, "If Ringo always chooses 2 and the other children select the numbers randomly, what is the probability that Ringo is declared the winner?"
To me, that's not the same as asking, "If Ringo always chooses 2 and the other children select the numbers randomly, what is the probability that the winner will be Ringo?"
The answer to the first question would be 1/4. The answer to the second question would be 1/3.
I may not be good at math, but I am pretty good at English (it was my major). I'm hoping that the real GMAT won't have any questions phrased so confusingly!
Here we have to omit the case of all selecting the same number ie all select 2 as in that case the round will be repeated.So we have threee possibilities as posted by the first poster and probablity turns out to be 1/3 and not 1/4.
Here we have to omit the case of all selecting the same number ie all select 2 as in that case the round will be repeated.So we have threee possibilities as posted by the first poster and probablity turns out to be 1/3 and not 1/4.
Show more
Clearly, Ringo has a 1/3 chance of being the winner--assuming there is a winner. But I don't like to assume things. Based on how the question was worded, how would I know to make that assumption? Because the reality is that in any round of the game, there is a 1/4 chance of there being no winner at all.
I think I'm just frustrated because everything I've learned so far in my studies for GMAT has taught me never to make assumptions when answering questions. If a stem doesn't explicitely state something, I shouldn't assume it to be so.
With this item, the stem doesn't explicitely state that we're looking for the odds of Ringo being the winner in a round where there is a 100% chance that someone will win. Therefore, there's no reason to think that we're not talking about a normal round--one in which there are 4 possible outcomes, 1 of which is that no one wins.
Now, it could be that this stem is just weak and unique to the Princeton book, and wouldn't actually appear on the GMAT worded this way. I sure hope that's the case.
Originally posted by fivedaysleft on 02 Jul 2011, 15:24.
Last edited by fivedaysleft on 02 Jul 2011, 15:27, edited 1 time in total.
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aaah...this is a problem involving bayes theorem of probability. event of ringo winning is two events exclusive of each other = there is a winner X ringo wins similiarly paul wins = winner X paul john wins = winner X john
winner = 3/4 = .75 john = paul = ringo = 1/4 = .25
now, the probability of ringo winning is = event when ringo wins / (sum of all winners) = .75*.25 / ((.75*.25)+(.75*.25)+(.75*.25)) =1/3 (clearly! no calculations needed)
the catchphrase here in the question is "If all of the children choose the same number, the process repeats until one child is declared the winner"
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.