Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
While solving absolute inequality questions, I have gone through 1 question and found the following solution.
The question was
What is the solution of the following equation 7 > |-3a + 5|,
Solution was i. 7 > +(-3a+ 5) 2 > -3a 2/3>-a a>-2/3
and ii. 7 > -(-3a + 5) 7 > 3a 12 > 3a 4 > a
so the solution is -2/3<a<4
If the above-mentioned solution is correct, then it is diluting the meaning of the absolute value of "-3a + 5". Why we are considering both +ve and -Ve values of -3a + 5, when only abolute value is less than 7. The negative value of "-3a + 5" may not be lesser than 7. Then how can we consider negative value as one of the solutions.
If anybody can explain the logic behind this, please comment.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
While solving absolute inequality questions, I have gone through 1 question and found the following solution.
The question was
What is the solution of the following equation 7 > |-3a + 5|,
Solution was i. 7 > +(-3a+ 5) 2 > -3a 2/3>-a a>-2/3
and ii. 7 > -(-3a + 5) 7 > 3a 12 > 3a 4 > a
so the solution is -2/3<a<4
If the above-mentioned solution is correct, then it is diluting the meaning of the absolute value of "-3a + 5". Why we are considering both +ve and -Ve values of -3a + 5, when only abolute value is less than 7. The negative value of "-3a + 5" may not be lesser than 7. Then how can we consider negative value as one of the solutions.
If anybody can explain the logic behind this, please comment.
Show more
First of all, the solution is correct. A good way to double check that it's correct is to plug in some values for a. The solution says that a is between -2/3 and 4; try the extreme values:
|-3(-2/3) + 5| = |2 + 5| = |7| = 7, so if a is a tiny bit greater than -2/3 (closer to 0), the absolute value will be less than 7.
|-3(4) + 5| = |-12 + 5| = |-7| = 7; likewise.
Also, try at least one value in the middle:
|-3(0) + 5| = |5| = 5, which is less than 7.
It seems like the answer is right.
I'm not totally sure I understand your question, but I think your concern has something to do with the idea of the 'negative value' of -3a + 5. Be aware that the 'negative value' of this expression isn't necessarily a negative number. For example, if a = 3, then the 'negative value' is -(-3a + 5) = -(-4) = 4. Think of the negative sign as being a 'reverse the sign' marker, not a marker saying that the expression has to be negative.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.