Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 02:21 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 02:21
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
monsoon1
User avatar
Joined: 23 Sep 2008
Last visit: 05 Jun 2015
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
167
Given Kudos: 137
Posts: 22
Kudos: 167
Pros and Cons Versus Compare and Contrast 17 Sep 2012, 10:56
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Pros and Cons Versus Compare and Contrast

I usually get confused when the main point of a passage has two of its answer choices mentioning as below:

1) "The author is discussing the pros and cons of the theories "
2) "The author is comparing and contrasting the theories "

Could someone please explain the exact meaning & their appropriate usages with relevant examples ?

Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,479
Own Kudos:
30,537
 [6]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,479
Kudos: 30,537
 [6]
Pros and Cons Versus Compare and Contrast 19 Sep 2012, 13:34
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
monsoon1
Pros and Cons Versus Compare and Contrast

I usually get confused when the main point of a passage has two of its answer choices mentioning as below:

1) "The author is discussing the pros and cons of the theories "
2) "The author is comparing and contrasting the theories "

Could someone please explain the exact meaning & their appropriate usages with relevant examples ?
Show more

I'm happy to help with this. :-)

Let's make this specific and concrete, for clarity. Let say, for the sake of argument, we are discussing President Clinton's foreign policy over his 8 year term.

If I discuss the pros and cons of President Clinton's foreign policy, then I am only discussing President Clinton's foreign policy and no other foreign policy. I am comparing the good parts, the strengths, of President Clinton's foreign policy to the weakness & oversights & shortcomings of this same policy. The entire focus is just on President Clinton's foreign policy, the good and the bad about that one policy. I am just looking at that one thing.

If am asked to compare and contrast President Clinton's foreign policy, then I am necessarily comparing it to something else (often, that other thing would be specified in both the RC passage and in the question). For example, I could compare and contrast President Clinton's foreign policy with the foreign policy of Reagan, or GW Bush, or Eisenhower, or Truman, etc. etc. I could even compare and contrast President Clinton's foreign policy with the foreign policy of some other contemporary world leader --- Mitterand, John Major, Yeltsin, Deng Xiaoping, etc. etc. Compare and contrast necessarily involves looking at President Clinton's foreign policy in relation to some other foreign policy. I have to look at more than one thing.

Pros & cons happen within, but compare & contrast happens between.
Pros & cons focus on the good vs. the bad of a single thing.
Compare & contrast necessarily involves at least two different things.

Does that make sense?

Mike :-)
User avatar
monsoon1
User avatar
Joined: 23 Sep 2008
Last visit: 05 Jun 2015
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
167
Given Kudos: 137
Posts: 22
Kudos: 167
Pros and Cons Versus Compare and Contrast 20 Sep 2012, 20:02
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
monsoon1
Pros and Cons Versus Compare and Contrast

I usually get confused when the main point of a passage has two of its answer choices mentioning as below:

1) "The author is discussing the pros and cons of the theories "
2) "The author is comparing and contrasting the theories "

Could someone please explain the exact meaning & their appropriate usages with relevant examples ?

I'm happy to help with this. :-)

Let's make this specific and concrete, for clarity. Let say, for the sake of argument, we are discussing President Clinton's foreign policy over his 8 year term.

If I discuss the pros and cons of President Clinton's foreign policy, then I am only discussing President Clinton's foreign policy and no other foreign policy. I am comparing the good parts, the strengths, of President Clinton's foreign policy to the weakness & oversights & shortcomings of this same policy. The entire focus is just on President Clinton's foreign policy, the good and the bad about that one policy. I am just looking at that one thing.

If am asked to compare and contrast President Clinton's foreign policy, then I am necessarily comparing it to something else (often, that other thing would be specified in both the RC passage and in the question). For example, I could compare and contrast President Clinton's foreign policy with the foreign policy of Reagan, or GW Bush, or Eisenhower, or Truman, etc. etc. I could even compare and contrast President Clinton's foreign policy with the foreign policy of some other contemporary world leader --- Mitterand, John Major, Yeltsin, Deng Xiaoping, etc. etc. Compare and contrast necessarily involves looking at President Clinton's foreign policy in relation to some other foreign policy. I have to look at more than one thing.

Pros & cons happen within, but compare & contrast happens between.
Pros & cons focus on the good vs. the bad of a single thing.
Compare & contrast necessarily involves at least two different things.

Does that make sense?

Mike :-)
Show more


Thank You Mike! +1 Kudos

Your explanations truly make sense! :)

Thanks again for the lucid explanation ! Very much clear now!
User avatar
monsoon1
User avatar
Joined: 23 Sep 2008
Last visit: 05 Jun 2015
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
167
Given Kudos: 137
Posts: 22
Kudos: 167
Pros and Cons Versus Compare and Contrast 24 Sep 2012, 20:14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
monsoon1
Pros and Cons Versus Compare and Contrast

I usually get confused when the main point of a passage has two of its answer choices mentioning as below:

1) "The author is discussing the pros and cons of the theories "
2) "The author is comparing and contrasting the theories "

Could someone please explain the exact meaning & their appropriate usages with relevant examples ?

I'm happy to help with this. :-)

Let's make this specific and concrete, for clarity. Let say, for the sake of argument, we are discussing President Clinton's foreign policy over his 8 year term.

If I discuss the pros and cons of President Clinton's foreign policy, then I am only discussing President Clinton's foreign policy and no other foreign policy. I am comparing the good parts, the strengths, of President Clinton's foreign policy to the weakness & oversights & shortcomings of this same policy. The entire focus is just on President Clinton's foreign policy, the good and the bad about that one policy. I am just looking at that one thing.

If am asked to compare and contrast President Clinton's foreign policy, then I am necessarily comparing it to something else (often, that other thing would be specified in both the RC passage and in the question). For example, I could compare and contrast President Clinton's foreign policy with the foreign policy of Reagan, or GW Bush, or Eisenhower, or Truman, etc. etc. I could even compare and contrast President Clinton's foreign policy with the foreign policy of some other contemporary world leader --- Mitterand, John Major, Yeltsin, Deng Xiaoping, etc. etc. Compare and contrast necessarily involves looking at President Clinton's foreign policy in relation to some other foreign policy. I have to look at more than one thing.

Pros & cons happen within, but compare & contrast happens between.
Pros & cons focus on the good vs. the bad of a single thing.
Compare & contrast necessarily involves at least two different things.

Does that make sense?

Mike :-)
Show more

Mike,

Does "Evaluate" (a theory, some research wok, a plan etc.) mean analysing positives and negatives of the respective subject/subjects?
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,479
Own Kudos:
30,537
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,479
Kudos: 30,537
Pros and Cons Versus Compare and Contrast 25 Sep 2012, 09:15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
monsoon1
Mike,
Does "Evaluate" (a theory, some research wok, a plan etc.) mean analysing positives and negatives of the respective subject/subjects?
Show more
Yes, the word "evaluate" literally means "give the value of" or "assess the value of" --- in other words, "say how valuable it is." When the question asks you to "evaluate", the question is asking for something thorough --- what are the strengths? what are the weaknesses? how realistic is it? how widely applicable is it? what are obvious points of support for it? what are obvious objections to it?
In short, yes, when the question say "evaluate", it's asking for the good, the bad, and the ugly.
Does that make sense?
Mike :-)
User avatar
monsoon1
User avatar
Joined: 23 Sep 2008
Last visit: 05 Jun 2015
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
167
Given Kudos: 137
Posts: 22
Kudos: 167
Pros and Cons Versus Compare and Contrast 27 Sep 2012, 12:26
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
monsoon1
Mike,
Does "Evaluate" (a theory, some research wok, a plan etc.) mean analysing positives and negatives of the respective subject/subjects?
Yes, the word "evaluate" literally means "give the value of" or "assess the value of" --- in other words, "say how valuable it is." When the question asks you to "evaluate", the question is asking for something thorough --- what are the strengths? what are the weaknesses? how realistic is it? how widely applicable is it? what are obvious points of support for it? what are obvious objections to it?
In short, yes, when the question say "evaluate", it's asking for the good, the bad, and the ugly.
Does that make sense?
Mike :-)
Show more

Thanks, Mike ! Makes sense :)
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,832
Own Kudos:
986
Posts: 18,832
Kudos: 986
Pros and Cons Versus Compare and Contrast 09 Jul 2020, 21:01
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
miag
189 posts
u1983
Current Student
710 posts
MikeScarn
Current Student
275 posts