GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 16 Aug 2018, 01:10

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# PS - LPV

 post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Director
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 587
PS - LPV  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2009, 19:42
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:20) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

if xy = 165 where x>y, the least possible value of x-y is:
A. 2
B. 4
C. 8
D. 13
E. 15

--== Message from GMAT Club Team ==--

This is not a quality discussion. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.

_________________

If You're Not Living On The Edge, You're Taking Up Too Much Space

GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1345
Re: PS - LPV  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2009, 21:24
priyankur_saha@ml.com wrote:
if xy = 165 where x>y, the least possible value of x-y is:
A. 2
B. 4
C. 8
D. 13
E. 15

None of the above. Where is the question from? x - y can be as close to zero as you like. If x = root(165) and y = root(165), then xy = 165 and x - y = 0; if you make x just slightly larger than root(165), there will need to be value of y just slightly smaller than root(165) for which xy = 165, and x - y is very close to zero.

Now, if the question were to say that x and y are positive integers, the answer would be different. We would then need to think of how we might write 165 as a product of two positive integers. 165 = 3*5*11, so the only products of positive integers that give 165 are:

11* 15 = 165
5 * 33 = 165
3 * 55 = 165
1 * 165 = 165

and of these, we get the smallest difference from x = 15 and y = 11; x - y = 4.
_________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

Director
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 587
Re: PS - LPV  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2009, 21:51
IanStewart wrote:
None of the above. Where is the question from? x - y can be as close to zero as you like. If x = root(165) and y = root(165), then xy = 165 and x - y = 0; if you make x just slightly larger than root(165), there will need to be value of y just slightly smaller than root(165) for which xy = 165, and x - y is very close to zero.

This is the right approach because it is not given that x and y are integers. I missed this clue....

Thanks Ian

--== Message from GMAT Club Team ==--

This is not a quality discussion. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.

_________________

If You're Not Living On The Edge, You're Taking Up Too Much Space

Re: PS - LPV &nbs [#permalink] 06 Apr 2009, 21:51
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# PS - LPV

 post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

# Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.