It is currently 14 Dec 2017, 13:13

Decision(s) Day!:

CHAT Rooms | Wharton R1 | Stanford R1 | Tuck R1 | Ross R1 | Haas R1 | UCLA R1


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Query on Negation Test by E-gmat

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 24 Aug 2009
Posts: 493

Kudos [?]: 879 [2], given: 276

Schools: Harvard, Columbia, Stern, Booth, LSB,
Query on Negation Test by E-gmat [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Apr 2013, 04:06
2
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Hi Experts,

I have few queries from one of the session posted by E-gmat.
article-what-and-how-to-negate-4-exercise-questions-138510.html#p1119593

Image
Query 1 – I am not able to understand how come SOME can include 100 of the test takers.
Query 2 – I am not able to understand how come NOT ALL can include 0 of the test takers.


Negated Statement=Super set-Space occupied by the answer choice

Image
For the below mentioned queries the above mentioned equation is the basis.
Query 3 – I am not able to understand how come logical opposite of ALL is NOT ALL (and not NONE) because if ALL includes all the 100 students then as per equation
Negated Statement = Super Set – Space occupied by the ALL
Negated statement should not include any test taker.

Query 4 – I am not able to understand how come logical opposite of SOME is NONE because if SOME includes only 1 (Worst Case Scenario) student then as per equation
Negated Statement = Super Set – Space occupied by the ALL
Negated statement should include remaining 99 test takers, a figure which is not equivalent to NONE.

Query 5 – I am not able to understand how come logical opposite of NOT ALL is ALL because if NOT ALL includes 99 (Worst Case Scenario) students then as per equation
Negated Statement = Super Set – Space occupied by the ALL
Negated statement should include remaining 1 test taker, a figure which is not equivalent to ALL.

Query 6 – I am not able to understand how come logical opposite of NEVER is SOMETIMES.

Waiting eagerly for experts valuable comments & insights.

Regards,
Fame
_________________

If you like my Question/Explanation or the contribution, Kindly appreciate by pressing KUDOS.
Kudos always maximizes GMATCLUB worth
-Game Theory

If you have any question regarding my post, kindly pm me or else I won't be able to reply

Kudos [?]: 879 [2], given: 276

Expert Post
3 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4554

Kudos [?]: 8969 [3], given: 112

Re: Query on Negation Test by E-gmat [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Apr 2013, 09:48
3
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
fameatop wrote:
Hi Experts,

I have few queries from one of the session posted by E-gmat.
Query 1 – I am not able to understand how come SOME can include 100 of the test takers.
Query 2 – I am not able to understand how come NOT ALL can include 0 of the test takers.

I would say this is a little extreme. If there is a population of 100 individuals, "some" definitely excludes zero and "not all" definitely excludes 100 --- that much is clear. I would say: it would be a bit deceitful if someone said "some" meant "all", or said "not all" and meant "none" ---- I disagree with those statements. If the GMAT talks about "some" in any context in which the meaning of this term matters, I would say you could count on it not meaning "all". I am particularly doubtful about this numerical scale leading folks to an understanding of the negation terms.

fameatop wrote:
For the below mentioned queries the above mentioned equation is the basis.
Query 3 – I am not able to understand how come logical opposite of ALL is NOT ALL (and not NONE) because if ALL includes all the 100 students then as per equation

Query 4 – I am not able to understand how come logical opposite of SOME is NONE because if SOME includes only 1 (Worst Case Scenario) student then as per equation

Query 5 – I am not able to understand how come logical opposite of NOT ALL is ALL because if NOT ALL includes 99 (Worst Case Scenario) students then as per equation

Query 6 – I am not able to understand how come logical opposite of NEVER is SOMETIMES.

Waiting eagerly for experts valuable comments & insights. Regards, Fame

Many students have misunderstanding about this. For the first, consider this statement:
(1) All triangles are equilateral.
That's a false statement. If we put in a word that means the opposite of "all", we can change this from a false statement to a true statement. If I use "not all", I get a true statement:
(2) Not all triangles are equilateral
Because this substitution changes the sentence from true to false, "not all" is a true opposite of "all". By contrast, look what happens if we use "no" or "none"
(3a) No triangles are equilateral.
(3b) In the set of triangles, none are equilateral.
These are false, as (1) is. If I start with a false statement, make a substitution, and the sentence stays false, then whatever I substituted wasn't a true opposite. A true opposite will change the truth value of the sentence.

The opposite of a "some" statement depends on context. I would say there's a not a one-size-fits all rule here. For example,
(4) Some prime numbers have integer square roots.
That is a false statement. Here, substituting the word no/not/none creates a true statement
(5) No prime numbers have integer square roots.
That is a bonafide true statement.
I would say, though, that most people would consider this a false statement also:
(6) Some even numbers are divisible by two.
Here, to get the correct statement, we need the word "all" ---
(7) All even numbers are divisible by two.
This is an unambiguously correct sentence.

In some ways, I handled "not all" vs. "all" in #1-3 above, but some more examples....
(8) Not all even numbers are divisible by two.
Clearly false.
(9) All even numbers are divisible by two.
The substitution, "not all" to "all", changes the true value, so these are true opposites.

Finally, the opposite of "never". Consider this false statement.
(10) The Dow Jones Industrial Average never goes up.
That's a false statement. Substitute in "always".
(11) The Dow Jones Industrial Average always goes up.
That's another false statement. That substitution does not change the truth value, so those two, "never" and "always", are not true opposites. By contrast, substitute "sometimes"
(12) The Dow Jones Industrial Average sometimes goes up.
That's an absolutely true sentence. This substitution shows that "sometimes" is actually the logical opposite of both "never" and "always", because substituting it for either of them (in #10 or #11) produces a true statement (#12)

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Kudos [?]: 8969 [3], given: 112

Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10203

Kudos [?]: 277 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Query on Negation Test by E-gmat [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Nov 2017, 08:40
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 277 [0], given: 0

Re: Query on Negation Test by E-gmat   [#permalink] 21 Nov 2017, 08:40
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Query on Negation Test by E-gmat

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.