Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
07 Nov 2011, 11:40
Kudos
Bookmarks
N
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 0
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Hi
Below is a sentence I have confusion about
The board is investigating the compensation packages of several executives in order to determine how much they may have been improperly awarded
this is not right according to manhattan gmat because underlined they could refer to packages or executives.
Question : Is it not obvious that they here refers to executives
Better : The board is .... how much these executives may have been improperly awarded.
Questio n : The above sentence even though more clear is not as concise. So in GMAT what is more important concision or clarity, though I also think going by logic they would mean executives, so no need for the better .
Please let me know
Thanks
Below is a sentence I have confusion about
The board is investigating the compensation packages of several executives in order to determine how much they may have been improperly awarded
this is not right according to manhattan gmat because underlined they could refer to packages or executives.
Question : Is it not obvious that they here refers to executives
Better : The board is .... how much these executives may have been improperly awarded.
Questio n : The above sentence even though more clear is not as concise. So in GMAT what is more important concision or clarity, though I also think going by logic they would mean executives, so no need for the better .
Please let me know
Thanks
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
07 Nov 2011, 13:40
Kudos
Bookmarks
I think the they could be confused with either the BOARD, the PACKAGES or the EXECUTIVES, you may know that the board is collective singular, but others may not. (although referring to board doesn't makes sense, the anxious reader may bite for it)
Concision tends to be the last grammar issue to look for in SC. The second sentence you provided CLEARLY states it's the executives that are being investigated. Think of a five year old reading this and have them ask, who is they?
If they could be two things, there is almost definitely a choice that repeats the "obvious" subject
Concision tends to be the last grammar issue to look for in SC. The second sentence you provided CLEARLY states it's the executives that are being investigated. Think of a five year old reading this and have them ask, who is they?
If they could be two things, there is almost definitely a choice that repeats the "obvious" subject
07 Nov 2011, 16:45
Kudos
Bookmarks
On GMAT, pronoun reference is governed by context or logic.
If there are two antecedents which may be grammatical referents of a pronoun, but if only one of those make logical sense with the pronoun, then there is no pronoun ambiguity. For example:
The car hit the tree, breaking its engine. - Here "it" can grammatically refer to either car or tree. But logically only "car" has engine, and hence "its" refers to car.
The car hit the tree, breaking its branches. - Here also "it" can grammatically refer to either car or tree. But logically only "tree" has branches, and hence "its" refers to tree.
The car hit the tree, breaking its parts. - Here also "it" can grammatically refer to either car or tree. And logically too both "car" an "tree" have parts, so in this sentence we have pronoun ambiguity.
Now lets consider the sentence in question:
The board is investigating the compensation packages of several executives in order to determine how much they may have been improperly awarded.
Likewise, in this sentence, both "packages" and "executives" make sense. Notice the two sentences below. Both are correct. So you may notice that we can get to either of these sentences if we replace "they" with these possible two antecedents.
Compensation packages may have been improperly awarded (to people).
Executives may have been improperly awarded (the compensation).
This is why there is pronoun ambiguity in this sentence.
Now lets assume, if we had the following sentence:
The board is investigating the compensation packages of several executives in order to determine how much they may have been improperly awarded to the executives.
Now only "packages" will make logical sense in place of "they". Thus, the sentence above does not have any pronoun ambiguity.
Thus, always go by logic to see if there is any pronoun ambiguity or not. Meaning is the key !!!
You may also review the following posts on pronoun ambiguity:
https://e-gmat.com/blogs/?p=289 - No Ambiguity
https://e-gmat.com/blogs/?p=285 - Possible Ambiguity
Payal
If there are two antecedents which may be grammatical referents of a pronoun, but if only one of those make logical sense with the pronoun, then there is no pronoun ambiguity. For example:
The car hit the tree, breaking its engine. - Here "it" can grammatically refer to either car or tree. But logically only "car" has engine, and hence "its" refers to car.
The car hit the tree, breaking its branches. - Here also "it" can grammatically refer to either car or tree. But logically only "tree" has branches, and hence "its" refers to tree.
The car hit the tree, breaking its parts. - Here also "it" can grammatically refer to either car or tree. And logically too both "car" an "tree" have parts, so in this sentence we have pronoun ambiguity.
Now lets consider the sentence in question:
The board is investigating the compensation packages of several executives in order to determine how much they may have been improperly awarded.
Likewise, in this sentence, both "packages" and "executives" make sense. Notice the two sentences below. Both are correct. So you may notice that we can get to either of these sentences if we replace "they" with these possible two antecedents.
Compensation packages may have been improperly awarded (to people).
Executives may have been improperly awarded (the compensation).
This is why there is pronoun ambiguity in this sentence.
Now lets assume, if we had the following sentence:
The board is investigating the compensation packages of several executives in order to determine how much they may have been improperly awarded to the executives.
Now only "packages" will make logical sense in place of "they". Thus, the sentence above does not have any pronoun ambiguity.
Thus, always go by logic to see if there is any pronoun ambiguity or not. Meaning is the key !!!
You may also review the following posts on pronoun ambiguity:
https://e-gmat.com/blogs/?p=289 - No Ambiguity
https://e-gmat.com/blogs/?p=285 - Possible Ambiguity
Payal
