Last visit was: 27 Apr 2026, 20:43 It is currently 27 Apr 2026, 20:43
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
jmuduke08
Joined: 21 Jul 2012
Last visit: 25 Mar 2015
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 58
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
jumsumtak
Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Last visit: 14 Jun 2023
Posts: 1,092
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 479
Concentration: Healthcare, Strategy
Posts: 1,092
Kudos: 594
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
jmuduke08
Joined: 21 Jul 2012
Last visit: 25 Mar 2015
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 58
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 27 Apr 2026
Posts: 43,165
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24,683
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 43,165
Kudos: 83,741
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1. I don't think you need to factor anything here.
2. Speed comes with practice
3. I fixed the typo in your first post (changed the + sign to -)

This is a tough equation, definitely designed to slow you down since even using the Quadratic formula it will take some time and few know that 729 is a square root of 27...

Your best bet is to think what 2 numbers are factors of 180 (but I would not want to do that on the real test)... I think the Quadratic formula is the best way to go and looking at 729 (the 9 is a giveaway that it is either 3 or 7 that will be involved).
User avatar
jumsumtak
Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Last visit: 14 Jun 2023
Posts: 1,092
Own Kudos:
594
 [1]
Given Kudos: 479
Concentration: Healthcare, Strategy
Posts: 1,092
Kudos: 594
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jmuduke08
My apologies I meant to type r^2-3r-180=0. Which give the solutions 15 and -12. I just wanted to know the quick way to get these high digit factors. I know how to factor but in terms of quickness, I couldn't think of 15 and -12 without a ton of trial and error which took too long

Posted from my mobile device


bb is right. Use the quadratic formula if it takes a lot of time to proceed by hit and trial.

for hit and trial:

I haven't yet seen any GMAT quadratic question in the form of ax^2+bx+c=0 with fractions/irrational numbers as roots . Almost always the solution will be integers. I'll write my thought process; see if that helps you quicken your hit and trial: (obviously this will look way longer than what happens in my head :) )

r^2-3r-180=0

this is what I make out of 180 and 3 at the first instant:
looking for 2 numbers whose product is 180 and sum is -3.
sum is negative -> implies bigger of the absolute factors is negative and the smaller is positive.

the second step is:
I break 180 into the simplest factors I can see. 18 x 10 in this case.
if it doesn't happen for me (as in this case) i break each into 2 more (simple) factors. (6x3)x(5x2)

this does it for me. I know 12 and 15 are the numbers I'm looking for. The key is not to break 180 into its prime factors but two simpler composite factors.

I don't know whether this helps or not. I just meant to show that you can work on your hit and trial (it should not take a ton of time). Saying that, if you don't have enough time for your GMAT, it would be wise to use the quadratic formula.

Best
Moderators:
193 posts
General GMAT Forum Moderator
473 posts