Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Jul 0901:00 PM EDT
-02:00 PM EDT
More Target Test Prep students are earning 100th percentile GMAT scores. Don’t settle for less when the Target Test Prep course gives you everything you need to score high on the GMAT. Start your 5-day free trial today.
Jul 1311:00 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EDT
Looking for your GMAT motivation to break through the score plateau? Pragati improved her score by massive 160 points with strategic guidance and hard-work! Find out how personalized mentorship and a strong mindset can turn GMAT struggles into success.
Jul 1508:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Full-length FE mock with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Jul 1609:30 AM EDT
-11:30 AM EDT
Is INSEAD your dream b-school and you're looking for solid prep and application strategies to get there? Check out Barkavi’s end-to-end journey to know how she did! Get insights into the INSEAD admissions process, know what Adcoms look at, and more!
Jul 1611:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Jul 1911:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
10 May 2021, 02:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
A
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
25%
(medium)
Question Stats:
81% (01:52) correct
19%
(02:21)
wrong
based on 175
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Recent research has shown that when calculators are allowed into classrooms at the elementary level, the arithmetic ability of pupils becomes weaker. The calculator is a convenient tool that increases accuracy and is widely used. The use of calculators in school should be limited to high school students. Developmental psychologists have proven that even though a child may seem to grasp a concept fully, that child needs time and practice to integrate it properly if it is to be used as an actual application.
Which of the following, if true, supports the argument's conclusion?
A. Subject matter in the high school syllabus is aimed at developing reasoning and problem-solving logic, and begins to move away from the rudimentary performing of tasks.
B. The systematic approach that working with a calculator demands can assist elementary pupils further in understanding arithmetic method.
C. The functionality of calculators is constantly being improved to include features that apply to a variety of study fields.
D. Almost 75% of the calculators used by elementary school pupils are bought by parents, not by request of their children.
E. In the professional world, many careless errors are committed that could have been prevented if calculators were used.
Which of the following, if true, supports the argument's conclusion?
A. Subject matter in the high school syllabus is aimed at developing reasoning and problem-solving logic, and begins to move away from the rudimentary performing of tasks.
B. The systematic approach that working with a calculator demands can assist elementary pupils further in understanding arithmetic method.
C. The functionality of calculators is constantly being improved to include features that apply to a variety of study fields.
D. Almost 75% of the calculators used by elementary school pupils are bought by parents, not by request of their children.
E. In the professional world, many careless errors are committed that could have been prevented if calculators were used.
15 May 2021, 04:15
Kudos
Bookmarks
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION
Recent research has shown that when calculators are allowed into classrooms at the elementary level, the arithmetic ability of pupils becomes weaker. The calculator is a convenient tool that increases accuracy and is widely used. The use of calculators in school should be limited to high school students. Developmental psychologists have proven that even though a child may seem to grasp a concept fully, that child needs time and practice to integrate it properly if it is to be used as an actual application.
Which of the following, if true, supports the argument's conclusion?
A. Subject matter in the high school syllabus is aimed at developing reasoning and problem-solving logic, and begins to move away from the rudimentary performing of tasks.
To solve this Conclusion Strengthening question, first break down the argument. The first two sentences are premises which provide factual data; the third sentence includes a recommendation word (should) so it's the conclusion; finally, the fourth sentence cites findings (have proven) so it's a premise:
- Premise A: When elementary pupils are given calculators their math becomes weaker
+
Premise B: the calculator is a useful tool
+
Premise C: children can learn about ideas but they also need to practice them
=
Conclusion: calculators should be used by high-school students only
Possible assumption: calculators cannot weaken the learning process of high school students
Strengthening Data: ?
You are required to find data that supports the statement that calculators should only be allowed in high school. The correct answer could be one that confirms the argument's assumption.
This answer choice confirms the argument's assumption by stating that in high school, more focus is put on logic and less on the rudimentary performing of tasks, so a calculator cannot detract from the learning process.
B. The systematic approach that working with a calculator demands can assist elementary pupils further in understanding arithmetic method.
Incorrect.
To solve this Conclusion Strengthening question, first break down the argument. The first two sentences are premises which provide factual data; the third sentence includes a recommendation word (should) so it's the conclusion; finally, the fourth sentence cites findings (have proven) so it's a premise:
- Premise A: When elementary pupils are given calculators their math becomes weaker
+
Premise B: the calculator is a useful tool
+
Premise C: children can learn about ideas but they also need to practice them
=
Conclusion: calculators should be used by high-school students only
Possible assumption: calculators cannot weaken the learning process of high school students
Strengthening Data: ?
You are required to find data that supports the statement that calculators should only be allowed in high school. The correct answer could be one that confirms the argument's assumption.
By presenting a positive aspect of the use of a calculator by elementary pupils, this answer choice weakens the conclusion which supports the use of calculators by high school students alone. Remember, you are looking for a statement that strengthens the conclusion.
C. The functionality of calculators is constantly being improved to include features that apply to a variety of study fields.
Incorrect.
This answer choice neither weakens nor strengthens the conclusion; describing the technological progress of calculators does not affect the conclusion in any way.
D. Almost 75% of the calculators used by elementary school pupils are bought by parents, not by request of their children.
Incorrect.
This answer choice does not weaken or strengthen the conclusion. Background information about how calculators reach the hands of elementary pupils does not affect the conclusion in any way.
E. In the professional world, many careless errors are committed that could have been prevented if calculators were used.
Incorrect.
This answer choice does not weaken or strengthen the conclusion. The argument deals with elementary and high school education. The professional world is irrelevant and does not affect the conclusion in any way.
General Discussion
10 May 2021, 02:34
Kudos
Bookmarks
Premise: If the pupils use calculator at elementary level, the arithmetic ability of pupils becomes weaker.
Also, a child may seem to grasp a concept fully, that child needs time and practice to integrate it properly.
Conclusion: The use of calculators in school should be limited to high school students.
Prethink: The argument is based on the assumption that the use of the calculator makes (causes - directly or indirectly) the child weak in arithmetic ability.
To support the argument, we should aim at why the calculators are not good for children at elementary level.Also, the blame should be put on the usage of the calculator only.
Let's see the choices.
A. Subject matter in the high school syllabus is aimed at developing reasoning and problem-solving logic, and begins to move away from the rudimentary performing of tasks.
Supports that the calculators should be used in high schools. Adds a reason for the statement in the conclusion. Looks correct.
B. The systematic approach that working with a calculator demands can assist elementary pupils further in understanding arithmetic method.
Supports that the elementary pupils can use the calculator. Thus, it weakens the argument.
C. The functionality of calculators is constantly being improved to include features that apply to a variety of study fields.
The improvement of the functionality does not impact the argument. Is the improvement good or bad for the children at elementary level?
D. Almost 75% of the calculators used by elementary school pupils are bought by parents, not by request of their children.
It doesn't matter who buys the calculators. The all that we know is that it's not good for children at elementary level.
E. In the professional world, many careless errors are committed that could have been prevented if calculators were used.
We don't have to worry about professional world.
A
Also, a child may seem to grasp a concept fully, that child needs time and practice to integrate it properly.
Conclusion: The use of calculators in school should be limited to high school students.
Prethink: The argument is based on the assumption that the use of the calculator makes (causes - directly or indirectly) the child weak in arithmetic ability.
To support the argument, we should aim at why the calculators are not good for children at elementary level.Also, the blame should be put on the usage of the calculator only.
Let's see the choices.
A. Subject matter in the high school syllabus is aimed at developing reasoning and problem-solving logic, and begins to move away from the rudimentary performing of tasks.
Supports that the calculators should be used in high schools. Adds a reason for the statement in the conclusion. Looks correct.
B. The systematic approach that working with a calculator demands can assist elementary pupils further in understanding arithmetic method.
Supports that the elementary pupils can use the calculator. Thus, it weakens the argument.
C. The functionality of calculators is constantly being improved to include features that apply to a variety of study fields.
The improvement of the functionality does not impact the argument. Is the improvement good or bad for the children at elementary level?
D. Almost 75% of the calculators used by elementary school pupils are bought by parents, not by request of their children.
It doesn't matter who buys the calculators. The all that we know is that it's not good for children at elementary level.
E. In the professional world, many careless errors are committed that could have been prevented if calculators were used.
We don't have to worry about professional world.
A
