Premise: If the pupils use calculator at elementary level, the arithmetic ability of pupils becomes weaker.
Also, a child may seem to grasp a concept fully, that child needs time and practice to integrate it properly.
Conclusion: The use of calculators in school should be limited to high school students.
Prethink: The argument is based on the assumption that the use of the calculator makes (causes - directly or indirectly) the child weak in arithmetic ability.
To support the argument, we should aim at why the calculators are not good for children at elementary level.Also, the blame should be put on the usage of the calculator only.
Let's see the choices.
A. Subject matter in
the high school syllabus is aimed at developing reasoning and problem-solving logic, and begins to move away from the rudimentary performing of tasks.
Supports that the calculators should be used in high schools. Adds a reason for the statement in the conclusion. Looks correct.B. The systematic approach that working with a calculator demands can assist elementary pupils further in understanding arithmetic method.
Supports that the elementary pupils can use the calculator. Thus, it weakens the argument.C. The
functionality of calculators is constantly being improved to include features that apply to a variety of study fields.
The improvement of the functionality does not impact the argument. Is the improvement good or bad for the children at elementary level? D. Almost 75% of the calculators used by elementary school pupils are
bought by parents, not by request of their children.
It doesn't matter who buys the calculators. The all that we know is that it's not good for children at elementary level.E. In the
professional world, many careless errors are committed that could have been prevented if calculators were used.
We don't have to worry about professional world. A