GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 22 Mar 2019, 15:35

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Recently political pressure groups have become far more effective at

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Posts: 43
Recently political pressure groups have become far more effective at  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 04 Mar 2019, 01:23
4
1
5
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

60% (01:42) correct 40% (02:14) wrong based on 296 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Recently political pressure groups have become far more effective at persuading industrial corporations to change. For example, as a result of the efforts of animal groups, many pharmaceutical and cosmetics companies have reduced their use of laboratory animals, substituting in their place alternative methods of product testing.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most serious doubt on the connection between pressure group activity and corporate change claimed above?


(A) Many companies in the pharmaceutical industry have increased their public relations spending in order to counter the activity of animal rights groups.

(B) Before the new methods of testing products are used, they have to be calibrated by comparison tests involving experiments on laboratory animals.

(C) When companies stop using laboratory animals, they generally go to some expense to publicize this change of policy.

(D) The pharmaceutical manufacturers who still use laboratory animals are mostly the smaller firms that have been less subject to pressure group activity.

(E) The methods of product testing that do not involve laboratory animals are faster and cheaper that the methods that do.

Originally posted by vermatanya on 23 Jan 2008, 22:36.
Last edited by GMATNinja on 04 Mar 2019, 01:23, edited 5 times in total.
Edited the question.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 777
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Recently political pressure groups have become far more effective at  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2008, 22:44
(E)The methods of product testing that do not involve laboratory animals are faster and cheaper that the methods that do.


Should be "E"
CEO
CEO
User avatar
B
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3420
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Recently political pressure groups have become far more effective at  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jan 2008, 07:38
1
2
E

Recently political pressure groups have become far more effective at persuading industrial corporations to change.For example, as a result of the efforts of animal groups, many pharmaceutical and cosmetics companies have reduced their use of laboratory animanls, substituting in their place alternative methods of product testing.

the first assumption: there was no other reason to reduce use of laboratory animanls by pharmaceutical and cosmetics companies

Which of the following, if true, casts the most serious doubt on the connection between pressure group activity and corporate chage claimed above?

(A)Many comp in the pharmaceutical industry have increased their public relations spending in order to counter the activity of animal rights groups. - irrelevant.
(B)Bfore the new methods of testing products are used, they have to be caliberated by comparison tests involving experiments on laboratory animals. - irrelevant.
(C)wHEN COMP STOP USING LABORATORY ANIMALS, THEY GENERALLY GO TO SOME EXPENSE TO PUBLICIZE THIS CHANGE of policy. irrelevant. strengthen. Despite of expenses companies have reduced their use of laboratory animals.
(D)The pharmaceutical manufacturrers who still use laboratory animals are mostly the smaller firms that have been less subject to pressure group activity. - irrelevant. slightly strengthen
(E)The methods of product testing that do not involve laboratory animals are faster and cheaper that the methods that do. - ok. it is the first assumption.
_________________

HOT! GMAT TOOLKIT 2 (iOS) / GMAT TOOLKIT (Android) - The OFFICIAL GMAT CLUB PREP APP, a must-have app especially if you aim at 700+ | Limited GMAT/GRE Math tutoring in Chicago

Manhattan Prep Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jun 2012
Posts: 71
Location: United States
Schools: UCSD (Rady) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Recently political pressure groups have become far more effective at  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2012, 13:31
1
I'm going with (B) here. First, the breakdown:

PREMISE: Pol groups caused some corps to switch from animal test to new test
CONCLUSION: Pol groups are more effective in making corps change (care about animals)
ASSUMPTION: Switching tests demonstrates that the corporations actually care.

(B) weakens the assumption by showing conclusively that the corporations don't care about animals, and therefore haven't changed at all.

(E), on the other hand, does not destroy the assumption - it's possible that corporations can care about both animals AND money (let's not be too cynical here). Furthermore, if the new tests are cheaper, why didn't the corporations switch earlier? Probably because the political pressure was the catalyst, which would actually strengthen our conclusion!
_________________

Ryan Jacobs | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | San Francisco

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 11 Feb 2018
Posts: 258
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 3: 750 Q50 V42
Re: Recently political pressure groups have become far more effective at  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jan 2019, 02:58
1
I feel C is a strong contender here....They stopped testing not because of the pressure but because they wanted publicity....

Experts please help...
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 25 Jun 2016
Posts: 11
Re: Recently political pressure groups have become far more effective at  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jan 2019, 21:56
The answer here should be option B.

Can you anyone what rationale was used to select answer as option E.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2019
Posts: 1
Re: Recently political pressure groups have become far more effective at  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jan 2019, 22:15
1
Answer is E

The question makes an assumption that the only reason pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries are using other alternative instead of laboratory animal is due to pressure.

E. This mentions that there are other reasons as well for a company to use other methods other than laboratory animals. Hence it defeats the assumption made.



Cheers!

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 03 Dec 2018
Posts: 117
Re: Recently political pressure groups have become far more effective at  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Feb 2019, 22:27
GMATNinja
Option E mentions the alternative cause, and thus weakens the conclusion.
But even answer choice B is weakening the conclusion. Please explain why option B is wrong?
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
P
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 2329
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: Recently political pressure groups have become far more effective at  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Mar 2019, 01:25
1
mallya12 wrote:
GMATNinja
Option E mentions the alternative cause, and thus weakens the conclusion.
But even answer choice B is weakening the conclusion. Please explain why option B is wrong?

To see the issue with answer choice (B), first look back at the exact wording of the question (the question as written in the original post left out a word; it has since been fixed, so this is the correct version):
Quote:
Which of the following, if true, casts the most serious doubt on the connection between pressure group activity and corporate change claimed above?

So, we are looking for a weakness in the connection between pressure group activity and corporate change. The author claims that "many pharmaceutical and cosmetics companies have reduced their use of laboratory animals" as a result of "the efforts of animal groups." As we go through the answer choices, we need to cast doubt on the claim that this corporate change was a result of political pressure group activity.

Let's take a look at answer choice (B):
Quote:
(B) Before the new methods of testing products are used, they have to be calibrated by comparison tests involving experiments on laboratory animals.

Answer choice (B) tells us that the shift away from using laboratory animals is not immediate, because new methods "have to be calibrated by comparison tests involving experiments on laboratory animals." However, this answer choice gives us no information on whether the corporate change is due to the activity of political pressure groups or some other factor. Because of this, answer choice (B) does not cast doubt on the claim that corporate change was a result of political pressure groups. (B) is out.

Now look again at (E):
Quote:
(E) The methods of product testing that do not involve laboratory animals are faster and cheaper that the methods that do.

This answer choice gives an alternate explanation for the corporate change away from using laboratory animals-- instead of being influenced by political pressure groups, maybe corporations changed because other methods were "faster and cheaper" than using animals. This casts doubt on the connection between political pressure group activity and corporate change. (E) is the correct answer.

I hope that helps!
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | Instagram | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars
Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply?
Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99 | Time management on verbal

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 08 Jul 2016
Posts: 68
Recently political pressure groups have become far more effective at  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Mar 2019, 02:32
Hi GMATNinja,

as a result of the efforts of animal groups, many pharmaceutical and cosmetics companies have reduced their use of laboratory animals, substituting in their place alternative methods of product testing.

Why are we attacking the highlighted sentence? I assumed that since this is a premise, I cannot attack this statement. I took it as a fact that efforts of animal groups indeed forced pharmaceutical and cosmetics companies to reduce their use of laboratory animals. Also, to me it doesn't look like an intermediate conclusion (there is no premise).
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 18 Feb 2019
Posts: 9
Re: Recently political pressure groups have become far more effective at  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Mar 2019, 00:26
Please advise how E is concluded here , even I have concluded E
VP
VP
User avatar
V
Status: It's near - I can see.
Joined: 13 Apr 2013
Posts: 1457
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Operations
Schools: INSEAD Jan '19
GMAT 1: 480 Q38 V22
GPA: 3.01
WE: Engineering (Real Estate)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Recently political pressure groups have become far more effective at  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Mar 2019, 02:28
1
madhurajmishra wrote:
Please advise how E is concluded here , even I have concluded E


E is the only choice that makes sense with the premise.

Choice E is simply saying that "It is not political pressure because of which the companies have shifted from animals to other products for experimenting, but it is the low cost of using products in place of animals.

"Alternate reasoning" is one of the ways that helps in weakening the conclusion.

Likewise , "No other alternate" makes a conclusion stronger.
_________________

"Do not watch clock; Do what it does. KEEP GOING."

GMAT Club Bot
Recently political pressure groups have become far more effective at   [#permalink] 05 Mar 2019, 02:28
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Recently political pressure groups have become far more effective at

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.