GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 26 May 2019, 20:22

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Researchers explain, being very eager to have constant access to fo

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
avatar
P
Joined: 17 May 2017
Posts: 130
Schools: ESSEC '20
GPA: 3
Reviews Badge
Researchers explain, being very eager to have constant access to fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jul 2017, 23:36
5
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  85% (hard)

Question Stats:

43% (01:35) correct 57% (01:57) wrong based on 121 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Researchers explain, being very eager to have constant access to food and secure backup from stronger members if they get caught in a fight, that baboons groom higher-ranking individuals in their group early in the day.


A) explain, being very eager to have constant access to food and secure backup from stronger members if they get caught in a fight, that baboons
B) explain that, being very eager to have constant access to food and secure backup from stronger members if they get caught in a fight, baboons
C) explain that because they are very eager to have constant access to food and secure backup from stronger members if they get caught in a fight, so baboons
D) explain, very eager to have constant access to food and secure backup from stronger members being caught in a fight, baboons
E) explain that baboons are very eager for constant access to food and backup from stronger members in a fight; they therefore

--== Message from the GMAT Club Team ==--

THERE IS LIKELY A BETTER DISCUSSION OF THIS EXACT QUESTION.
This discussion does not meet community quality standards. It has been retired.


If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 23 Dec 2013
Posts: 11
Re: Researchers explain, being very eager to have constant access to fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jul 2017, 23:47
haardiksharma wrote:
Can someone explain error in C

The error is with the word, they. 'they' refers to whom? Researchers or baboons?

I'll go with answer B. Kindly update the OA.

Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 06 Jul 2016
Posts: 363
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Researchers explain, being very eager to have constant access to fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jul 2017, 00:00
haardiksharma wrote:
Researchers explain, being very eager to have constant access to food and secure backup from stronger members if they get caught in a fight, that baboons groom higher-ranking individuals in their group early in the day.


A) explain, being very eager to have constant access to food and secure backup from stronger members if they get caught in a fight, that baboons
B) explain that, being very eager to have constant access to food and secure backup from stronger members if they get caught in a fight, baboons
C) explain that because they are very eager to have constant access to food and secure backup from stronger members if they get caught in a fight, so baboons
D) explain, very eager to have constant access to food and secure backup from stronger members being caught in a fight, baboons
E) explain that baboons are very eager for constant access to food and backup from stronger members in a fight, they therefore


I was confused between B & E, and picked B. And the answer is E.
The thing that put me off about E was an entire clause followed by a comma, and then another clause without a conjunction. Therefore, comes after 'they' and I thought that was odd -> which we know by now is a mistake on the GMAT. But any other insights into E?
The only thing I can think of is that the non-restrictive modifier is actually necessary to showcase the meaning of the sentence.
_________________
Put in the work, and that dream score is yours!
Retired Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Long way to go!
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Posts: 1353
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Researchers explain, being very eager to have constant access to fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jul 2017, 00:04
1
haardiksharma wrote:
Researchers explain, being very eager to have constant access to food and secure backup from stronger members if they get caught in a fight, that baboons groom higher-ranking individuals in their group early in the day.


A) explain, being very eager to have constant access to food and secure backup from stronger members if they get caught in a fight, that baboons
This choice is awkward. It is so unclear that which part "being very eager to have" refers to.

B) explain that, being very eager to have constant access to food and secure backup from stronger members if they get caught in a fight, baboons
same as A.

C) explain that because they are very eager to have constant access to food and secure backup from stronger members if they get caught in a fight, so baboons
this choice is wrong since "they" here seems to refer to "researchers", not "baboons"

D) explain, very eager to have constant access to food and secure backup from stronger members being caught in a fight, baboons
this choice is awkward.

E) explain that baboons are very eager for constant access to food and backup from stronger members in a fight, they therefore
Correct. This choice makes the sentence and meaning clear.
_________________
Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2873
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Researchers explain, being very eager to have constant access to fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jul 2017, 07:43
4
akshayk wrote:
haardiksharma wrote:
Researchers explain, being very eager to have constant access to food and secure backup from stronger members if they get caught in a fight, that baboons groom higher-ranking individuals in their group early in the day.


A) explain, being very eager to have constant access to food and secure backup from stronger members if they get caught in a fight, that baboons
B) explain that, being very eager to have constant access to food and secure backup from stronger members if they get caught in a fight, baboons
C) explain that because they are very eager to have constant access to food and secure backup from stronger members if they get caught in a fight, so baboons
D) explain, very eager to have constant access to food and secure backup from stronger members being caught in a fight, baboons
E) explain that baboons are very eager for constant access to food and backup from stronger members in a fight, they therefore


I was confused between B & E, and picked B. And the answer is E.
The thing that put me off about E was an entire clause followed by a comma, and then another clause without a conjunction. Therefore, comes after 'they' and I thought that was odd -> which we know by now is a mistake on the GMAT. But any other insights into E?
The only thing I can think of is that the non-restrictive modifier is actually necessary to showcase the meaning of the sentence.


In my opinion option E is wrong. The construction of the sentence is as follows:

Independent clause 1:
Researchers explain that baboons are very eager for constant access to food and backup from stronger members in a fight.

Independent clause 2:
They therefore groom higher-ranking individuals in their group early in the day.

There are two ways to join two independent clauses:
a. comma + conjunction
OR
b. semicolon

Here just a comma is used, making the construction wrong. The correct construction could be:
...... in a fight, AND they therefore...
or,
...... in a fight; they therefore....
Director
Director
avatar
S
Joined: 21 Mar 2016
Posts: 518
Reviews Badge
Re: Researchers explain, being very eager to have constant access to fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jul 2017, 08:48
sayantanc2k wrote:
akshayk wrote:
haardiksharma wrote:
Researchers explain, being very eager to have constant access to food and secure backup from stronger members if they get caught in a fight, that baboons groom higher-ranking individuals in their group early in the day.


A) explain, being very eager to have constant access to food and secure backup from stronger members if they get caught in a fight, that baboons
B) explain that, being very eager to have constant access to food and secure backup from stronger members if they get caught in a fight, baboons
C) explain that because they are very eager to have constant access to food and secure backup from stronger members if they get caught in a fight, so baboons
D) explain, very eager to have constant access to food and secure backup from stronger members being caught in a fight, baboons
E) explain that baboons are very eager for constant access to food and backup from stronger members in a fight, they therefore


I was confused between B & E, and picked B. And the answer is E.
The thing that put me off about E was an entire clause followed by a comma, and then another clause without a conjunction. Therefore, comes after 'they' and I thought that was odd -> which we know by now is a mistake on the GMAT. But any other insights into E?
The only thing I can think of is that the non-restrictive modifier is actually necessary to showcase the meaning of the sentence.


In my opinion option E is wrong. The construction of the sentence is as follows:

Independent clause 1:
Researchers explain that baboons are very eager for constant access to food and backup from stronger members in a fight.

Independent clause 2:
They therefore groom higher-ranking individuals in their group early in the day.

There are two ways to join two independent clauses:
a. comma + conjunction
OR
b. semicolon

Here just a comma is used, making the construction wrong. The correct construction could be:
...... in a fight, AND they therefore...
or,
...... in a fight; they therefore....



+1 for this....two Independent clauses cannot be connected by only comma
any expert opinion please
Board of Directors
User avatar
V
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3631
Reviews Badge
Re: Researchers explain, being very eager to have constant access to fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jul 2017, 01:13
I rejected A, C and D as they have very obvious errors.

I selected B over E because E is joining two ICs with a comma and without any FANBOYS.

Please suggest how can E be the correct answer. If it is not, please let me whether I can go ahead and update B as the answer.
_________________
My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40
My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub | Importance of an Error Log!
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place
Blog: Subscribe to Question of the Day Blog
GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More.
New Visa Forum - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here.
New! Best Reply Functionality on GMAT Club!
Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free
Check our new About Us Page here.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2873
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Researchers explain, being very eager to have constant access to fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jul 2017, 01:33
1
abhimahna wrote:
I rejected A, C and D as they have very obvious errors.

I selected B over E because E is joining two ICs with a comma and without any FANBOYS.

Please suggest how can E be the correct answer. If it is not, please let me whether I can go ahead and update B as the answer.


I have changed the comma to semicolon in option E. So the OA remains E.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 06 Jul 2016
Posts: 363
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Researchers explain, being very eager to have constant access to fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jul 2017, 01:43
sayantanc2k wrote:
abhimahna wrote:
I rejected A, C and D as they have very obvious errors.

I selected B over E because E is joining two ICs with a comma and without any FANBOYS.

Please suggest how can E be the correct answer. If it is not, please let me whether I can go ahead and update B as the answer.


I have changed the comma to semicolon in option E. So the OA remains E.


Thanks. Now E makes sense :)
_________________
Put in the work, and that dream score is yours!
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 11 Nov 2013
Posts: 14
Location: Pakistan
Concentration: Finance, Nonprofit
GMAT 1: 480 Q34 V22
GMAT 2: 540 Q33 V31
GMAT 3: 620 Q42 V34
GPA: 3.6
WE: Other (Non-Profit and Government)
Reviews Badge
Re: Researchers explain, being very eager to have constant access to fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jul 2017, 05:08
1
sayantanc2k wrote:
abhimahna wrote:
I rejected A, C and D as they have very obvious errors.

I selected B over E because E is joining two ICs with a comma and without any FANBOYS.

Please suggest how can E be the correct answer. If it is not, please let me whether I can go ahead and update B as the answer.


I have changed the comma to semicolon in option E. So the OA remains E.


Very well explained. But what makes B incorrect ?
Board of Directors
User avatar
V
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3631
Reviews Badge
Researchers explain, being very eager to have constant access to fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jul 2017, 05:29
Babar28 wrote:

Very well explained. But what makes B incorrect ?


Hi Babar28 ,

In B, 'they' can refer to either members or baboons. So, pronoun ambiguity error.
_________________
My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40
My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub | Importance of an Error Log!
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place
Blog: Subscribe to Question of the Day Blog
GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More.
New Visa Forum - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here.
New! Best Reply Functionality on GMAT Club!
Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free
Check our new About Us Page here.
VP
VP
User avatar
D
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1008
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Researchers explain, being very eager to have constant access to fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jul 2017, 07:07
Imo E
We need that in the sentence .
Also " baboons are very eager for constant access to food and backup from stronger members in a fight" is essential for the sentence so we have keep it as a main part of the sentence .
So only option E makes sense .
_________________
Please give kudos if you found my answers useful
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 20 Jan 2016
Posts: 181
Re: Researchers explain, being very eager to have constant access to fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jul 2017, 04:54
I was between B and E as well. But I chose B.

Can someone please explain what makes B incorrect. I think the 'being very eager....' clearly refers to 'Baboons' are the end.

IMO, E is unnecessarily wordy. Thoughts?
Board of Directors
User avatar
V
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3631
Reviews Badge
Re: Researchers explain, being very eager to have constant access to fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jul 2017, 05:53
pra1785 wrote:
I was between B and E as well. But I chose B.

Can someone please explain what makes B incorrect. I think the 'being very eager....' clearly refers to 'Baboons' are the end.

IMO, E is unnecessarily wordy. Thoughts?


Hi pra1785 ,

Please check here:

https://gmatclub.com/forum/researchers- ... l#p1892468
_________________
My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40
My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub | Importance of an Error Log!
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place
Blog: Subscribe to Question of the Day Blog
GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More.
New Visa Forum - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here.
New! Best Reply Functionality on GMAT Club!
Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free
Check our new About Us Page here.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4768
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Researchers explain, being very eager to have constant access to fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jul 2017, 11:25
Top Contributor
B) explain that, being very eager to have constant access to food and secure backup from stronger members if they get caught in a fight, baboons
E)) explain that baboons are very eager for constant access to food and backup from stronger members in a fight; they therefore

1. In B, being used as part of a modifier is incorrect

2. But if 'they' is ambiguous in B, is it not in E?
_________________
The Take-Away: Grammar First and Then the Rest
Board of Directors
User avatar
V
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3631
Reviews Badge
Re: Researchers explain, being very eager to have constant access to fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jul 2017, 11:30
daagh wrote:
B) explain that, being very eager to have constant access to food and secure backup from stronger members if they get caught in a fight, baboons
E)) explain that baboons are very eager for constant access to food and backup from stronger members in a fight; they therefore

1. In B, being used as part of a modifier is incorrect

2. But if 'they' is ambiguous in B, is it not in E?


Hi daagh Sir,

In E, we are joining two different independent clauses using a semi colon. So, shouldn't the subject of both match?

I mean can't I say they in the second clause can refer back to baboons?

Please suggest.
_________________
My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40
My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub | Importance of an Error Log!
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place
Blog: Subscribe to Question of the Day Blog
GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More.
New Visa Forum - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here.
New! Best Reply Functionality on GMAT Club!
Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free
Check our new About Us Page here.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4768
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Researchers explain, being very eager to have constant access to fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jul 2017, 11:42
Top Contributor
If you want to match the subjects, then the real subject of the first part is the 'researchers. However, 'baboons' is only the subject of the subordinate clause. The situation is really leading to some dilemma. For all that, one may say that baboons are the logical contenders. So far so good and therefore, E is passable.
However, my point was that one shouldn't t rule out B or A on pronoun ambiguity, but on other counts.
_________________
The Take-Away: Grammar First and Then the Rest
Board of Directors
User avatar
V
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3631
Reviews Badge
Researchers explain, being very eager to have constant access to fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jul 2017, 11:48
daagh wrote:
If you want to match the subjects, then the real subject of the first part is the 'researchers. However, 'baboons' is only the subject of the subordinate clause. The situation is really leading to some dilemma. For all that, one may say that baboons are the logical contenders. So far so good and therefore, E is passable.
However, my point was that one shouldn't t rule out B or A on pronoun ambiguity, but on other counts.


Thank you daagh Sir. Point noted. Actually I was not sure about the usage of being. So,I rejected on the basis of pronoun ambiguity.

Can you please tell me why usage of being as a part of modifier is incorrect?

--== Message from the GMAT Club Team ==--

THERE IS LIKELY A BETTER DISCUSSION OF THIS EXACT QUESTION.
This discussion does not meet community quality standards. It has been retired.


If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.

_________________
My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40
My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub | Importance of an Error Log!
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place
Blog: Subscribe to Question of the Day Blog
GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More.
New Visa Forum - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here.
New! Best Reply Functionality on GMAT Club!
Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free
Check our new About Us Page here.
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 4383
Re: Researchers explain, being very eager to have constant access to fo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 May 2019, 11:14
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Researchers explain, being very eager to have constant access to fo   [#permalink] 21 May 2019, 11:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Researchers explain, being very eager to have constant access to fo

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.