Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
I wanted to know about the various ways people review RC questions.
For example, I've established a pretty good error log for SC and CR problems.
An incorrect SC question usually has a note such as
1. "prefer ... compared to" is redundant 2. "missed modifier error" 3. "missed meaning change", etc. 4. "spent too little time, didn't figure out the core sentence; incomprehensible"
Similarly, a CR question upon review gives me insights of things I missed:
1. "did not completely understand the option" 2. "assumed that X will lead to Y"
I have not been able to establish (and maybe hence improve) RC questions. One of the barriers is the size of the passage. Usually, with SC and CR questions, I copy the whole question (which has a real learning) and put it into a PPT. I can't really incorporate an RC passage (because I know I won't re-read the passage, etc.)
So, I'm just seeking the opinion of all you amazing people (including experts such as mikemcgarry, egmat, @GMATNinja) as to how to properly review RC questions.
Any feedback will be appreciated.
PS: I couldn't really find any threads which talked about this, hence the post.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Hi jennpt Good to hear from you. I went through the post you mentioned. I think you raise a couple of interesting points which I'll incorporate into my RC strategy.
More specifically, 1. Do you have any advice for tacking RCs which are heavy in technical jargon? I tend to get hung up on those which breaks the flow of my reading (and hence comprehension). I end up taking more times and making more mistakes.
2. I've noticed that I get general idea questions correct, but struggle with inference questions a bit (especially inference + EXCEPT). Any advice on how to tackle those?
I don't know if you'll like this advice, but my usual prescription for discomfort in reading technical stuff is ... to read more technical stuff. What kind of jargon trips you up - is it the hard science topics like biochemistry or astrophysics? For those, some daily reading from a website like Science News could start to help you feel more comfortable. Look for topics you know nothing about and dive in. Most of my students report that after 5 days of reading 1 or 2 hard science articles per day, those topics start to seem easier and more readable to them.
For your question about inference EXCEPT, I might best understand what's going wrong if you can link to one or two examples of questions you got wrong, and explain your reasoning -> how did you choose your answer, and why did you eliminate the credited (correct) answer?
One of the simpler examples is present here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/japanese-swords-194239.html I share this RC example because this was a topic I really liked and read with a lot of enthusiasm. I got all questions correct except the second question.
Quote:
2. Each of the following is mentioned in the passage EXCEPT (A) Every Japanese sword has a unique structure that can be traced back to a special forging process. (B) Master smiths kept their forging techniques secret. (C) The Japanese sword was considered by some to have a spiritual quality. (D) Master smiths are now considered artists by most major historians. (E) The Japanese sword is considered both a work of art and a historical artifact.
Show more
I chose choice A. I cannot really trace why I jumped at the option. I guess one of the reasons could be that it's not explicitly stated, but can be easily inferred.
Relevant text (IMO):
Quote:
It was common, though optional, for a master smith to place a physical Signature on a blade; in addition, every master smith had a "structural signature" due to his own secret forging process.
Show more
So, any advice on how I can avoid making mistakes on EXCEPT questions would be valuable.
Thanks for sharing this example. Why did you eliminate D?
(When reviewing incorrect RC questions, I like to ask: What was wrong with my answer choice and why/how did I not see that at the time? Why did I eliminate the correct answer choice? Because Verbal questions are always a matter of process of elimination, we need the answers to both questions to help understand what went wrong and how you can correct for that in the future.)
jennpt, I eliminated D in the example I shared because of this part of the text:
Quote:
This effort made each blade as unique as the samurai who wielded it; today the Japanese sword is recognized as much for its artistic merit as for its historical significance.
Show more
I drew a real-world inference and presumed that the sword makers are now considered artists.
In hindsight, I realize the mistake, but I seem to make such mistakes more often on EXCEPT questions. Let me know what you think.
In D, we can support the inference that the sword makers could be considered artists. What we cannot support is "by most major historians." Who knows anything about what most major historians think?? The passage never mentions "major historians."
In RC questions, make sure you read all the way to end of each answer choice - and be sure you can agree with all the words. Question writers love to start off answer choices with words or concepts from the passage but then add on random words at the end that change the meaning and make the answer out of scope.
With EXCEPT questions, I wonder if you might be making more mistakes because you are getting a bit impatient with the question, and therefore you're not reading every answer choice with the full sharp focus that you need to identify how the writers are making one answer choice incorrect. Could that have anything to do with it?
When I see an EXCEPT question, I say to myself, "I'm going to have to do more work on this question. I need to find 4 answer choices that DO answer the question, and the one remaining option, regardless of what it is, will be my correct answer choice."
A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.