KyleWiddison
ivyph
I think the sentence is already correct? Answer D could be correct if it repeats the sentence, but it adds "to" that makes an incorrect grammer. How could it be "Scientists to admit that they are ..." ?
Per my post above, I would look at the verb tense issue first. Using the past tense "were" doesn't make sense in the sentence and unnecessarily changes tense from the main verb. Be careful about changing tenses without reason.
KW
I don't feel that the verb tense is necessarily an issue... It could very well be that the scientists were uncertain about the origin, but no longer are...
This is especially true when used with the word "admit." Usually, you admit to something that happened in the past. "I admit that I was foolish" or "I admit that I was wrong"
However, I believe that "Cannot do x but to y" can be idiomatically correct. "Cannot x but for y" would also be idiomatically correct.
"I tried but to no avail" is a pretty common expression.
"but to each their own"
etc..
but I don't believe that this case is one of those idiomatically correct ones.
More on this here:
https://english.stackexchange.com/questi ... p-thinkingStill.. i was torn, and my gut says A...
but i hate trusting my gut.
EDIT:
After extensive google searching, the answer is C.
"Cannot help but to admit" and "cannot help but admit" are both nonstandard.
According to multiple sources,
https://languageandgrammar.com/2009/01/2 ... t-grammar/https://www.english-test.net/forum/ftopic6044.htmlhttps://englishplus.com/grammar/00000199.htmThe correct usage should be "cannot help admitting"