Sentence fragment

Question

I have a question about fragment sentences, that is sentences that lack verb or subject. Let's take those two examples from Manhattan sentence correction strategy guide:

1. The cat sitting by the stairs watched the mouse. 
2. A new textbook focused on recent advances in artificial intelligence assigned by our instructor.

According to Manhattan's explanation, the first sentence is grammatically correct as it includes a subject (cat) and a verb (watched). On the contrary, the second sentence is fragment because it lacks a main verb. Up to their explanation, for the sentence to be grammatically correct , the sentence should written as "A new textbook ... was assigned" (we should add "was" before the word assigned).

I don't understand what is the difference - in structure - between the two sentences that make's the first sentence right and the second sentence wrong. In other words, why should we add the word "was" to the second question but not to the first sentence?

Thanks in advance!

Suryangshu · Answer

Only assigned makes it a past participle so in order to make it a verb we need to add the was

Posted from my mobile device

oryahalom · Answer

My question is why this is the case. In general assign is a verb.

Suryangshu · Answer

Assign is a verb but assigned isn't a verb it's a participle.

Posted from my mobile device

oryahalom · Answer

I assigned 1,000$ for the concert. It is not a complete sentence? I think it is.

Sentence fragment

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards