Last visit was: 28 Apr 2026, 11:38 It is currently 28 Apr 2026, 11:38
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions
User avatar
Carcass
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Last visit: 28 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,710
Own Kudos:
37,867
 [3]
Given Kudos: 4,927
Posts: 4,710
Kudos: 37,867
 [3]
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Carcass
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Last visit: 28 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,710
Own Kudos:
37,867
 [2]
Given Kudos: 4,927
Posts: 4,710
Kudos: 37,867
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Carcass
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Last visit: 28 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,710
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4,927
Posts: 4,710
Kudos: 37,867
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
johanzac
Joined: 05 Jul 2022
Last visit: 11 Aug 2025
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 97
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
Posts: 12
Kudos: 12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sub : Option C vs E

I had an internal debate on why Option C was eliminated, if anyone else is having something similar, hope this helps.

My understanding was that, given the premise doesn't validate the possibility of any other reason for the use of printer paper (The possibility may or may not exist). Within the conditions in the premise of the argument, Option C "Companies that used more printer paper were more likely to switch to electronic memos than companies that used less printer paper" still strengthens the conclusion.
Agreed the strengthener doesn't seal the conclusion from any other possible contention (And that is not a must-do role of a strengthener), Only in the light of more information about possibilities of other uses of paper (like mentioned in option E) does Option C get's affected. But you can't carry over information from one argument to another. And I personally find it tricky to validate the existence of two options and choose the best out of the two (I believe GMAT will leave some clues to eliminate the other option).

If you resonate with me, you might find the below reason helpful.
If you analyze the conclusion option C is leading you to is that Companies that use more paper are more likely to use e-Memo, hence MORE LIKELY less paper will be used. And imo that is the point, MORE LIKELY vs "LESS WILL BE USED". The conclusion is definitive, hence you need a definitive statement that eliminates some (or all) other possible cases of uses of paper and that is Option E " The amount of printer paper needed to explain the electronic memos is less than the amount that would have been used for handwritten memos".

Just wanted to share my internal debate, if anyone was in a similar situation. Hope this may be helpful to you.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
507 posts
363 posts