Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 1212:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Make the most of your break with the most realistic GMAT™ prep. Take up to $700 off select products.
May 1308:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
In Episode 4 of our GMAT Ninja CR series, we tackle the most intimidating CR question type: Boldface & "Legalese" questions. If you've ever stared at an answer choice that reads, "The first is a consideration introduced to counter a position that...- May 14
08:30 AM PDT
-09:30 AM PDT
Most GMAT test-takers are intimidated by the hardest GMAT Verbal questions. In this session, Target Test Prep GMAT instructor Erika Tyler-John, a 100th percentile GMAT scorer, will show you how top scorers break down challenging Verbal questions..
02 Feb 2005, 10:12
Kudos
Bookmarks
N
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 1
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Since a sambhar, a large, horned Asiatic deer, with no horn is worthless to poachers, the Wildlife Protection Committee plans to protect selected sambhars from being killed by poachers by cutting off their horns.
The Wildlife Protection Committee’s plan assumes that
(A) poachers do not kill sambhars for any reason other than to obtain their horn
(B) hornless sambhars pose less of a threat to humans, including poachers, than do sambhars that have horns
(C) sambhars are the only animals poachers kill for their horns
(D) hornless sambhars can successfully defend their young against non-human predators
(E) imposing more stringent penalties on poachers will not decrease the number of sambhars killed by poachers
The Wildlife Protection Committee’s plan assumes that
(A) poachers do not kill sambhars for any reason other than to obtain their horn
(B) hornless sambhars pose less of a threat to humans, including poachers, than do sambhars that have horns
(C) sambhars are the only animals poachers kill for their horns
(D) hornless sambhars can successfully defend their young against non-human predators
(E) imposing more stringent penalties on poachers will not decrease the number of sambhars killed by poachers
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
03 Feb 2005, 09:29
Kudos
Bookmarks
I will go with ‘A’
‘B’ – Out of context
‘C’ – Discussion is only about sambhars, so out of context.
‘D’ – Out of context
‘E’ – This cannot be directly assumed unless we assume that there is already penalties in place.
‘B’ – Out of context
‘C’ – Discussion is only about sambhars, so out of context.
‘D’ – Out of context
‘E’ – This cannot be directly assumed unless we assume that there is already penalties in place.
