OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONArgument ConstructionSituation
A bank’s depositors are concerned that the bank may be failing but are reassured to learn that the bank’s executives are buying shares in the bank. The depositors believe that these purchases show that the bank must be sound. The argument calls their belief into question by stating that executives sometimes purchase stocks in their own company merely to create the appearance of corporate health.
Reasoning
What role do the two boldfaced portions play in the argument that the bank’s depositors may have been misled into believing the bank is sound? The first portion states an intermediate conclusion drawn by the depositors: that “evidently” the bank’s executives believe the bank is sound, as demonstrated by their stock purchases. The argument, however, describes this reasoning as overly optimistic. The second portion offers evidence that undermines the support for the intermediate conclusion: executives may not necessarily buy stock out of faith in their company, but rather to create a misleading public impression of such faith.
A. The first portion does describe evidence used in the reasoning that the argument calls into question, namely that the stock purchases by executives demonstrate their faith in the company; however, the second portion is opposing evidence, not information regarding the source of the earlier evidence.
B. The first portion does describe evidence supporting a belief that the argument views as misguided, namely the belief that rumors the bank is collapsing must be false; however, the second portion is not the overall conclusion, but support for that conclusion: that the depositors may be mistaken in believing the bank is sound after all.
C.
Correct. The first portion describes the intermediate conclusion drawn by the depositors: the executives clearly believe the bank is healthy. The argument immediately calls this conclusion into question by calling it overly optimistic, then, in the second portion, offers evidence against the support used by the depositors in drawing their hopeful conclusion: executives’ stock purchases may derive not from genuine faith in their company, but rather from a desire to create the illusion of such faith.D. The first portion does describe the intermediate conclusion drawn by the depositors, namely that the executives have faith in the bank’s health; however, the second portion is not the overall conclusion but support for that conclusion: that the depositors may be overly optimistic in taking the executives’ purchases as reassurance.
E. The first portion does describe the intermediate conclusion drawn by the depositors, namely that the executives have faith in the bank’s health; the second portion, however, is evidence against that intermediate conclusion, not a further conclusion it supports.