So what exactly do we mean when we say environmental markets and how

Question

Adapted and reprinted with the permission of the author, Jonathan Rappe.

So what exactly do we mean when we say “environmental markets” and how are these markets going to impact the business landscape? First, the basics: Anytime a unit of exchange arises from an underlying activity that is perceived to benefit the environment by either the buyer of that unit or the governing body that created the units of exchange, the main ingredients of an environmental market are present. In a cap-and-trade system, the governing body places a cap on the total amount of air or water pollution that may be emitted by issuing an equivalent number of allowances, denominated in units of pollution. These allowances may be issued by the government to the business entities that are regulated by the program in amounts similar to their expected production, to lessen the economic impact, or those entities may have to purchase the allowances from the government in an auction. At the end of each specified period, usually a year, the business entities will have to surrender a number of allowances, or permits, equal to their generation of pollution during the period. As the governing entity reduces the supply of allowances available to the market in each subsequent year, the price will go up unless the regulated businesses invest in technologies that will reduce their pollution per unit of output, thereby reducing their demand and the overall market demand for allowances. Environmental markets that are not set up as cap-and-trade markets in the U.S. include the state-level markets for renewable energy credits, which are granted to producers of renewable energy and given value because utilities must purchase an amount of these credits determined by the state, and the voluntary market for greenhouse-gas emissions, in which credits arising from a unit of greenhouses gas emissions avoided are granted to owners of qualifying project activities by accredited third-party verifiers and sold to voluntary buyers, primarily to conform with the buyer’s goal of becoming “carbon neutral.” Companies can claim to be carbon neutral if they purchase an amount of these credits for avoided greenhouse-gas emissions equivalent to the total amount of emissions they produce. This is increasingly important from a public relations and corporate responsibility perspective in the United States, even in the absence of federal legislation governing greenhouse-gas emissions.    1 
 1. When the author uses the word allowances, he is referring to

A. the amount of pollution an entity is permitted to emit.
B. the funds a business must set aside to pay for pollution cleanup.
C. the total government penalty issued to those companies that pollute the air and water.
D. the economic impact of the reduction of emissions in a given year.
E. a system by which allowable pollution units are increased as pollution increases.

2 
 2. The author believes that it is important for a company to become carbon neutral because

I. The company will benefit from a good public image.
II. The company will demonstrate its awareness of accountability.
III. The company will be complying with government regulations.

A. I only
B. II only
C. I and II
D. I and III
E. I, II, and III

3 
 3. The author of this passage most likely would agree that

A. government regulations that control allowable greenhouse-gas emissions are too stringent.
B. the U.S. has a history of refusing to address environmental problems, a position that will adversely affect the growth of business in this country.
C. renewable resources in the United States are so abundant as to make regulations that govern their use superfluous.
D. in the future, more value will be placed on any activities that lessen the impact of development on natural systems.
E. the realistic goal of the environmental movement should be to completely eliminate air and water pollution in the United States.

4 
 4. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the author’s argument?

A. Even those companies that invest in pollution-reducing technologies will see a substantial increase in their demand for allowances.
B. Insufficient data exist, as of yet, to make conclusive claims about the efficacy of “green” programs in the corporate sector.
C. Researchers attempting to quantify the less-tangible benefits of green construction believe investment in water technologies and a renewed interest in solar-energy innovation will reward Wall Street investors.
D. A major U.S. bank recently announced that its new building will employ a heat exchange system that will gather heat from groundwater and use it to help heat the building in the winter.
E. The Climate Security Act of 2008 proposes a reduction in allowable carbon emissions but will allow a facility to use the allowances itself, sell them on a public carbon allowance exchange, or transfer them to another company for a negotiated price.

5 
 5. The author’s attitude toward the companies that “claim to be carbon neutral” can best be described as

A. skeptical of the validity of their claim in light of continued noncompliance with government regulations.
B. indignant toward their refusal to change policy from abusive practices to voluntary compliance.
C. cautiously appreciative of their willingness to accept responsibility in the absence of government regulations.
D. totally detached and dismissive, as he rejects any arguments that run counter to his position.
E. resigned, as he accepts the postponement of the companies’ acquiescence to the government regulations currently in effect in the U.S.

RC Butler 2022  -  Practice Two RC Passages Everyday.   
Passage # 182 Date: 05-May-2022
 This question is a part of RC Butler 2022 .  Click here for Details

Source: Cliffs Test Prep.

VidishaBanerjee · Answer

Please provide the official explanation of question no. 3

Posted from my mobile device

Sajjad1994 · Answer

Official Explanation

3. The author of this passage most likely would agree that

Difficulty Level:   650

Explanation

The author’s position throughout the passage has been supportive of activities that will lessen the negative impact on the environment. He would not agree with  Choice A  or  Choice C.  No evidence in the passage supports  Choice B. Choice E  is unrealistic.

Answer: D

Shahnazhusain0227 · Answer

Question 4. Not abpe to understand please explain

Sajjad1994 · Answer

Official Explanation

4. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the author’s argument?

Difficulty Level:   650-700

Explanation

The author’s argument would be most weakened by  Choice A , which is counter to his position.  Choice B  is too vague to weaken his argument.  Choices C, D,  and  E , while tangentially related, are not opposed to his position.

Answer: A

itzvatsal27 · Answer

The explanation you provided did not accord with our understanding. Please provide a detailed explanation explaining every option

Sajjad1994 · Answer

Explanation

4. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the author’s argument?

Explanation

A.   This statement weakens the author's argument because it suggests that companies investing in pollution-reducing technologies will still have a substantial increase in their demand for allowances. If companies that invest in technologies to reduce pollution still need a significant number of allowances, it questions the effectiveness of such technologies in reducing overall demand for allowances.

B.  This statement doesn't directly challenge the author's explanation of environmental markets or the functioning of cap-and-trade systems. It addresses the efficacy of "green" programs but doesn't provide information that contradicts the author's points.

C.  This statement talks about potential benefits of green construction and doesn't specifically address the author's argument about environmental markets or cap-and-trade systems. It discusses rewards for investors but doesn't counter the author's points about the mechanisms of environmental markets.

D.  This statement provides an example of a U.S. bank implementing sustainable technology but doesn't directly challenge the author's explanation of environmental markets. It's more about a specific initiative rather than addressing the broader points made by the author.

E.  This statement is consistent with the author's explanation of cap-and-trade systems. It doesn't weaken the argument; instead, it supports the idea of allowances being used, sold, or transferred as part of the environmental market.

In summary, option A weakens the argument by suggesting that even with pollution-reducing technologies, there will be a substantial increase in the demand for allowances.

Answer: A

kalpita63 · Answer

please provide explanation for Q2

Sajjad1994 · Answer

Explanation

2. The author believes that it is important for a company to become carbon neutral because

Explanation

I. The company will benefit from a good public image.  
 
 This statement is supported by the text. The author mentions that companies can claim to be carbon neutral if they purchase credits for avoided greenhouse-gas emissions. This is described as increasingly important from a public relations perspective in the United States.

II. The company will demonstrate its awareness of accountability.  
 
 This statement is also supported by the text. The idea of participating in environmental markets, including the voluntary market for greenhouse-gas emissions, implies a company's proactive engagement in environmental responsibility. It demonstrates an awareness of accountability for the environmental impact of its operations.

III. The company will be complying with government regulations.  
 
 This statement is partially supported by the text. The text mentions cap-and-trade systems where the government regulates and issues allowances for air or water pollution. However, the discussion about becoming carbon neutral in the absence of federal legislation suggests that this is not the only motivation. While the government might regulate certain aspects, it's not the sole driver for companies to become carbon neutral.  
 Answer: C

So what exactly do we mean when we say environmental markets and how

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Reading Comprehension (RC) Questions

So what exactly do we mean when we say environmental markets and how

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards