pr27here
Hi Team,
Why not option B?
If last year they had underreported the anxiety and this year they collected correct data, it will show it has increased.
If last year the anxiety rate was 10% where as it should have been 30%. This year it is 20%. Obviously if we compare to the wrong data it shows as more.
First of all, if you read the stimulus carefully, you will see that nowhere the current year is mentioned:
Quote:
Statistical studies show that last year there was the greatest drop in the violent crime rate over the course of a year since such statistics were first gathered. But they also reveal that at the same time public anxiety about violent crime substantially increased.
It clearly says that last year, the drop in the violent crime rate was greatest, and still last year ("at the same time") the public anxiety was substantially increased. We have no idea about the current year's statistics.
Now option B says:
Quote:
(B) As in the past, last year’s increase in public anxiety about violent crime has been consistently underreported in the news media.
If this option is true, the anxiety reported last year was underreported. So the actual anxiety was even more. This increases the discrepancy even more instead of resolving it.