akshitab2912
Hi
chetan2u generis KarishmaB GMATNinjaTwo GMATNinja: I am unable to wrap my head around option D for the last question.
My contention with D is that a decrease in demand will not cause unemployment because attrition will reduce the size of the workforce - but if attrition will reduce the size of the workforce - where will the people who had undergone attrition go? Will they resign or will they retire or will they be fired? Because at the end of the day, attrition will reduce the size of the team & hence little unemployment will happen. But the question says that little unemployment will also not happen. Unemployment means the state of being unemployed. That is a state of not working/joblessness. Unemployment can be 1% or 10% - how is that even relevant? Unemployment will happen. So Option C or D according to me should be the answer because people who would have gone attrition would go find job somewhere or pick up some other skill. I am miserable, pls help.
You are overthinking here. We have to answer as per the passage. Note the question -
"
According to the passage, small downward shifts in the demand for labor will not usually cause unemployment because"
We are given in the passage:
Relatively small or gradual changes in demand are likely to cause little unemployment. In the individual firm or even in the labor market as a whole, normal attrition may be sufficient to reduce the size of the work force in the affected occupations. The passage says that normal attrition is enough to reduce the size of the work force in affected occupations. So that is that.
Even if you must wonder what happens to those who quit - they could join a job in another industry where demand is increasing or they could have left the job for nurturing the kids or they may have retired. It doesn't matter. We are given that small downward shifts in demand do not cause unemployment because normal attrition handles this. How exactly it happens is not for us to worry about.