Conclusion: An increase in tax incentives for ethanol production would lessen America's dependence on foreign oil.
Ideas: We are looking for something which suggests otherwise, that is we will still need the same amount of oil or more.
- may be the production will need more oil
Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt upon the validity of the legislators’ conclusion?
A. It takes 1.5 gallons of oil to produce 1 gallon of ethanol.
Increase in tax benefit would encourage people to produce more ethanol. But, if we need more quantity of oil to produce smaller quantity of ethanol, then we will need more oil than we are using currentlyB. Electric cars are cheaper to operate than cars running on the ethanol fuel mix.
Operating costs is not a concern of the conclusionC. It costs thousands of dollars to retrofit an automobile to run on the ethanol fuel mix.
Retrofitiing costs is not a concern of the conclusionD. The ethanol/gasoline blend emits more pollution that regular gasoline.
Polution is not a concern of the conclusionE. The ethanol/gasoline blend has not been widely adopted in Europe.
Oversees adoption is not a concern of the conclusionBunuel
Studies have shown that an automobile that runs on a blend of 85% ethanol/15% gasoline gets better mileage than an otherwise similar car equipped with a gasoline engine. Many American legislators have concluded that an increase in tax incentives for ethanol production would lessen our dependence on foreign oil.
Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt upon the validity of the legislators’ conclusion?
A. It takes 1.5 gallons of oil to produce 1 gallon of ethanol.
B. Electric cars are cheaper to operate than cars running on the ethanol fuel mix.
C. It costs thousands of dollars to retrofit an automobile to run on the ethanol fuel mix.
D. The ethanol/gasoline blend emits more pollution that regular gasoline.
E. The ethanol/gasoline blend has not been widely adopted in Europe.