GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 15 Dec 2018, 15:09

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in December
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Open Detailed Calendar
  • $450 Tuition Credit & Official CAT Packs FREE

     December 15, 2018

     December 15, 2018

     10:00 PM PST

     11:00 PM PST

    Get the complete Official GMAT Exam Pack collection worth $100 with the 3 Month Pack ($299)
  • FREE Quant Workshop by e-GMAT!

     December 16, 2018

     December 16, 2018

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score.

Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

SVP
SVP
User avatar
V
Status: Preparing GMAT
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 1927
Location: Pakistan
GPA: 3.39
Premium Member CAT Tests
Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 27 Nov 2018, 11:27
2
8
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

53% (01:37) correct 47% (01:56) wrong based on 507 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not typically read above grade level. In the United States, more than three out of ten children watch television at least 35 hours per week. In other western countries, less than one child out of ten watches that much television. In contrast, these other children perform much better than American children on reading tests and more often read above grade level. A majority of these non American children read above their school grade level; a smaller percentage of American children read above grade level. In order to read as well as children in other western countries, American children will have to reduce the amount of time they spend watching television.

The passage depends upon which one of the following assumptions?

(A) American children are not as interested in reading well as children in other western countries.
(B) Other children are more structured in their studies than children in the United States.
(C) If a child wants to become a better reader, he or she will not watch as much television.
(D) If a child watches less television, his or her reading level will increase.
(E) The methods American teachers and parents use to teach reading are not significantly worse than the methods used by teachers and parents in other western countries.

Source: Nova GMAT
Difficulty Level: 750

_________________

Final days of the GMAT Exam? => All GMAT Flashcards.
This Post Helps = Press +1 Kudos
Best of Luck on the GMAT!!


Originally posted by SajjadAhmad on 30 Apr 2017, 10:00.
Last edited by SajjadAhmad on 27 Nov 2018, 11:27, edited 1 time in total.
Board of Directors
User avatar
V
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3620
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Apr 2017, 10:12
3
The argument is saying watching more television leads to decrease in grade level. It is based on the study done on American and western children.

So, the assumption should be other conditions were same on those children. It was just the TV viewing duration.

This is what option E is doing. It is saying there was no other change in teaching methods. Hence, an assumption.

(A) American children are not as interested in reading well as children in other western countries. : ok, so there are not interested in reading, Then no matter even if they reduce TV duration, they are not going to read. So, a weakner. Hence, incorrect.
(B) Other children are more structured in their studies than children in the United States. : Other children are OFS.
(C) If a child wants to become a better reader, he or she will not watch as much television. : This is irrelevant what he would be if he does that.
(D) If a child watches less television, his or her reading level will increase. : Same as C
(E) The methods American teachers and parents use to teach reading are not significantly worse than the methods used by teachers and parents in other western countries.Correct for the reasons stated above.
_________________

My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40
My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub | Importance of an Error Log!
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place
Blog: Subscribe to Question of the Day Blog
GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More.
New Visa Forum - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here.
New! Best Reply Functionality on GMAT Club!
Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free
Check our new About Us Page here.

Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 19 Mar 2016
Posts: 35
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V27
GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V40
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Consumer Electronics)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 May 2017, 21:44
I picked up D as the option, but I realise my mistake now. The argument only talks about bringing the reading level of American children at par with that of western children. D, instead, points out an increase (to what extent?)

E is the best option.
_________________

Please correct me in case I'm wrong; consider giving kudos, otherwise.

Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: The best is yet to come.....
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 499
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jun 2017, 01:15
By negating D, we get

If a child watches MORE television, his or her reading level will increase--> this breaks down the conclusion.
So, why it is not OA?
_________________

Hasan Mahmud

Intern
Intern
avatar
S
Joined: 06 May 2014
Posts: 44
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jun 2017, 01:31
Mahmud6 wrote:
By negating D, we get

If a child watches MORE television, his or her reading level will increase--> this breaks down the conclusion.
So, why it is not OA?



I have the same doubt, because I choose D over E by applying negation only. otherwise if I just select on the basis of prethinking 'E' is a better option!
someone please explain!!
_________________

Utilize your 'today' to build up your tomorrow'!

.... Looking for some kudos here...

Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Posts: 628
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jun 2017, 03:20
tanvi9 wrote:
Mahmud6 wrote:
By negating D, we get

If a child watches MORE television, his or her reading level will increase--> this breaks down the conclusion.
So, why it is not OA?



I have the same doubt, because I choose D over E by applying negation only. otherwise if I just select on the basis of prethinking 'E' is a better option!
someone please explain!!

Hi,
I think my approach will help you.
MY analysis .
Premies : Increased T.V ----> not good reading lvls
Conclusion : Decrease in T.V ----> reading lvl increase.
A causal relationship is mentioned in the problem set.

I think both D and E are contenders.
D says that decreasing will increase the reading lvls.
E is eliminating alternate cause.

Let's dig in little more using LSAT Terminology
In order to - SC indicator.

Increase Reading lvls ---> Decreasing T.V viewing.

D is wrong reversal :) .
Decreasing T.V ---> Increasing Reading lvls.
Which is wrong.
Hence, D is wrong .

So Answer should be E.
Intern
Intern
avatar
S
Joined: 06 May 2014
Posts: 44
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jun 2017, 03:32
Nightmare007 wrote:
tanvi9 wrote:
Mahmud6 wrote:
By negating D, we get

If a child watches MORE television, his or her reading level will increase--> this breaks down the conclusion.
So, why it is not OA?



I have the same doubt, because I choose D over E by applying negation only. otherwise if I just select on the basis of prethinking 'E' is a better option!
someone please explain!!

Hi,
I think my approach will help you.
MY analysis .
Premies : Increased T.V ----> not good reading lvls
Conclusion : Decrease in T.V ----> reading lvl increase.
A causal relationship is mentioned in the problem set.

I think both D and E are contenders.
D says that decreasing will increase the reading lvls.
E is eliminating alternate cause.

Let's dig in little more using LSAT Terminology
In order to - SC indicator.

Increase Reading lvls ---> Decreasing T.V viewing.

D is wrong reversal :) .
Decreasing T.V ---> Increasing Reading lvls.
Which is wrong.
Hence, D is wrong .

So Answer should be E.


Have you applied conditional reasoning?
sufficient--> necessary
on that basis it a wrong reversal.

are actual Gmat questions this tricky? that you have to apply conditional reasoning in an assumption question?
_________________

Utilize your 'today' to build up your tomorrow'!

.... Looking for some kudos here...

Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Posts: 628
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jun 2017, 03:37
tanvi9 wrote:
Have you applied conditional reasoning?
sufficient--> necessary
on that basis it a wrong reversal.

are actual Gmat questions this tricky? that you have to apply conditional reasoning in an assumption question?


Yeah once we cross 700, we will get some questions where conditional reasoning will be helpful to eliminate answers, while sometimes we need to use conditional reasoning to get answers especially in inference questions. :) .
Intern
Intern
avatar
S
Joined: 06 May 2014
Posts: 44
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jun 2017, 03:42
Nightmare007 wrote:
tanvi9 wrote:
Have you applied conditional reasoning?
sufficient--> necessary
on that basis it a wrong reversal.

are actual Gmat questions this tricky? that you have to apply conditional reasoning in an assumption question?


Yeah once we cross 700, we will get some questions where conditional reasoning will be helpful to eliminate answers, while sometimes we need to use conditional reasoning to get answers especially in inference questions. :) .



Thanks for the explaination.
Also can you elaborate more on why negation failed here? I am quite confused now as what to be applied when.
_________________

Utilize your 'today' to build up your tomorrow'!

.... Looking for some kudos here...

Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Posts: 628
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jun 2017, 03:59
3
1
tanvi9 wrote:
Nightmare007 wrote:
tanvi9 wrote:
Have you applied conditional reasoning?
sufficient--> necessary
on that basis it a wrong reversal.

are actual Gmat questions this tricky? that you have to apply conditional reasoning in an assumption question?


Yeah once we cross 700, we will get some questions where conditional reasoning will be helpful to eliminate answers, while sometimes we need to use conditional reasoning to get answers especially in inference questions. :) .



Thanks for the explaination.
Also can you elaborate more on why negation failed here? I am quite confused now as what to be applied when.


SC --- > NC
A ---> B. - given .
We can conclude that - !B ---> !A.- contrapositive.
But
B ---> A - wrong reversal
!A -----> !B - wrong negation

+kudos if you find this useful.
Intern
Intern
avatar
S
Joined: 06 May 2014
Posts: 44
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jun 2017, 04:04
Thanks,

meanwhile i went back to conditional reasoning explanations and I guess will have to always judge in the stimulus only if conditional reasoning or casual relation occurs and then go to answer choices with the frame of mind.

kudos given
_________________

Utilize your 'today' to build up your tomorrow'!

.... Looking for some kudos here...

SVP
SVP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1645
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jun 2017, 13:24
1
A is the answer for explanation question, B is the weakener
C,D cannot be assumption because of "if..."
Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: The best is yet to come.....
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 499
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2017, 23:13
What would be the negated statement of option D?

D. If a child watches less television, his or her reading level will increase.

Below is my take:

If a child watches MORE television, his or her reading level will increase.

Any expert, please?
_________________

Hasan Mahmud

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 31 Dec 2015
Posts: 16
Re: Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Aug 2017, 23:34
GMATNInja- Please help me understand how the parents' methods are relevant in this case?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Posts: 473
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Re: Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Oct 2017, 02:01
Nightmare007 wrote:
tanvi9 wrote:
Mahmud6 wrote:
By negating D, we get

If a child watches MORE television, his or her reading level will increase--> this breaks down the conclusion.
So, why it is not OA?



I have the same doubt, because I choose D over E by applying negation only. otherwise if I just select on the basis of prethinking 'E' is a better option!
someone please explain!!

Hi,
I think my approach will help you.
MY analysis .
Premies : Increased T.V ----> not good reading lvls
Conclusion : Decrease in T.V ----> reading lvl increase.
A causal relationship is mentioned in the problem set.

I think both D and E are contenders.
D says that decreasing will increase the reading lvls.
E is eliminating alternate cause.

Let's dig in little more using LSAT Terminology
In order to - SC indicator.

Increase Reading lvls ---> Decreasing T.V viewing.

D is wrong reversal :) .
Decreasing T.V ---> Increasing Reading lvls.
Which is wrong.
Hence, D is wrong .

So Answer should be E.


Hi Nightmare,

is n't choice D, a wrong negation ?

Premise : watching more television (A) -> decreases reading levels (B)
D: watching less television( not A) -> increases reading grades (not B).

I eliminated D considering it as wrong negation and chose E. Please correct me if i am wrong

thanks
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 05 Oct 2017
Posts: 14
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
Schools: ISB '21, IIMA , IIMC
GPA: 4
WE: Analyst (Energy and Utilities)
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Nov 2018, 08:25
1
Let us do some meaning analysis. In a nutshell the passage states that In order to read well as children of western countries american children will have to reduce time spend watching television.
To arrive at this conclusion he presents a fact that western children perform better than american children on reading tests and can read above their grade level. Also they spend less time watching television. So he tries to draw the conclusion by relating only time spent watching television with that of performance of reading tests.

Pre thinking - He assumes that there is no significant difference in teaching methods of both the countries.

Options:-a,b - if negated doesn't effect the conclusion
c,d - already stated in the passage can't be an assumption
e - in line with our pre thinking analysis -correct
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 11 Apr 2016
Posts: 14
Re: Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Nov 2018, 10:02
1
I option D - If a child watches less television, his or her "reading level" will increase - Reading Level is poorly defined. From stimulus, i could only presume that it refers to the "grade level" of reading.

The argument throws a lot of stats, such as more students in other countries read above the grade in which they currently are. But nowhere it is explicitly stated that reading above your grade increases reading abilities. Its just stated as a correlation. It may very well be possible that reducing TV time would result in more free time at hand and students start reading above their grade but without increasing their reading abilities.

E clearly gives an alternative cause.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not &nbs [#permalink] 28 Nov 2018, 10:02
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.