It is currently 20 Nov 2017, 08:48

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

2 KUDOS received
VP
VP
User avatar
V
Status: Preparing for the GMAT
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 1280

Kudos [?]: 1096 [2], given: 543

Location: Pakistan
GPA: 3.4
Premium Member CAT Tests
Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Apr 2017, 11:00
2
This post received
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  85% (hard)

Question Stats:

52% (01:36) correct 48% (01:58) wrong based on 335 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Source: Nova GMAT

Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not typically read above grade level. In the United States, more than three out of ten children watch television at least 35 hours per week. In other western countries, less than one child out of ten watches that much television. In contrast, these other children perform much better than American children on reading tests and more often read above grade level. A majority of these non American children read above their school grade level; a smaller percentage of American children read above grade level. In order to read as well as children in other western countries, American children will have to reduce the amount of time they spend watching television.

The passage depends upon which one of the following assumptions?

(A) American children are not as interested in reading well as children in other western countries.
(B) Other children are more structured in their studies than children in the United States.
(C) If a child wants to become a better reader, he or she will not watch as much television.
(D) If a child watches less television, his or her reading level will increase.
(E) The methods American teachers and parents use to teach reading are not significantly worse than the methods used by teachers and parents in other western countries.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Official PS Practice Questions
Press +1 Kudos if this post is helpful

Kudos [?]: 1096 [2], given: 543

2 KUDOS received
Board of Directors
User avatar
D
Status: Aiming MBA
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 2762

Kudos [?]: 916 [2], given: 67

Location: India
GPA: 3.65
WE: Information Technology (Health Care)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Apr 2017, 11:12
2
This post received
KUDOS
The argument is saying watching more television leads to decrease in grade level. It is based on the study done on American and western children.

So, the assumption should be other conditions were same on those children. It was just the TV viewing duration.

This is what option E is doing. It is saying there was no other change in teaching methods. Hence, an assumption.

(A) American children are not as interested in reading well as children in other western countries. : ok, so there are not interested in reading, Then no matter even if they reduce TV duration, they are not going to read. So, a weakner. Hence, incorrect.
(B) Other children are more structured in their studies than children in the United States. : Other children are OFS.
(C) If a child wants to become a better reader, he or she will not watch as much television. : This is irrelevant what he would be if he does that.
(D) If a child watches less television, his or her reading level will increase. : Same as C
(E) The methods American teachers and parents use to teach reading are not significantly worse than the methods used by teachers and parents in other western countries.Correct for the reasons stated above.
_________________

How I improved from V21 to V40! ?

Kudos [?]: 916 [2], given: 67

Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 19 Mar 2016
Posts: 45

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 43

Location: India
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V27
GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V40
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Consumer Electronics)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 May 2017, 22:44
I picked up D as the option, but I realise my mistake now. The argument only talks about bringing the reading level of American children at par with that of western children. D, instead, points out an increase (to what extent?)

E is the best option.
_________________

Please correct me in case I'm wrong; consider giving kudos, otherwise.

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 43

CR Forum Moderator
avatar
P
Status: The best is yet to come.....
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 471

Kudos [?]: 198 [0], given: 191

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jun 2017, 02:15
By negating D, we get

If a child watches MORE television, his or her reading level will increase--> this breaks down the conclusion.
So, why it is not OA?
_________________

Hasan Mahmud

Kudos [?]: 198 [0], given: 191

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
S
Joined: 06 May 2014
Posts: 37

Kudos [?]: 25 [1], given: 168

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jun 2017, 02:31
1
This post received
KUDOS
Mahmud6 wrote:
By negating D, we get

If a child watches MORE television, his or her reading level will increase--> this breaks down the conclusion.
So, why it is not OA?



I have the same doubt, because I choose D over E by applying negation only. otherwise if I just select on the basis of prethinking 'E' is a better option!
someone please explain!!
_________________

Utilize your 'today' to build up your tomorrow'!

.... Looking for some kudos here...

Kudos [?]: 25 [1], given: 168

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Posts: 468

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 50

Location: India
Schools: Duke '20, Tepper '20
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GPA: 4
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jun 2017, 04:20
tanvi9 wrote:
Mahmud6 wrote:
By negating D, we get

If a child watches MORE television, his or her reading level will increase--> this breaks down the conclusion.
So, why it is not OA?



I have the same doubt, because I choose D over E by applying negation only. otherwise if I just select on the basis of prethinking 'E' is a better option!
someone please explain!!

Hi,
I think my approach will help you.
MY analysis .
Premies : Increased T.V ----> not good reading lvls
Conclusion : Decrease in T.V ----> reading lvl increase.
A causal relationship is mentioned in the problem set.

I think both D and E are contenders.
D says that decreasing will increase the reading lvls.
E is eliminating alternate cause.

Let's dig in little more using LSAT Terminology
In order to - SC indicator.

Increase Reading lvls ---> Decreasing T.V viewing.

D is wrong reversal :) .
Decreasing T.V ---> Increasing Reading lvls.
Which is wrong.
Hence, D is wrong .

So Answer should be E.

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 50

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
S
Joined: 06 May 2014
Posts: 37

Kudos [?]: 25 [1], given: 168

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jun 2017, 04:32
1
This post received
KUDOS
Nightmare007 wrote:
tanvi9 wrote:
Mahmud6 wrote:
By negating D, we get

If a child watches MORE television, his or her reading level will increase--> this breaks down the conclusion.
So, why it is not OA?



I have the same doubt, because I choose D over E by applying negation only. otherwise if I just select on the basis of prethinking 'E' is a better option!
someone please explain!!

Hi,
I think my approach will help you.
MY analysis .
Premies : Increased T.V ----> not good reading lvls
Conclusion : Decrease in T.V ----> reading lvl increase.
A causal relationship is mentioned in the problem set.

I think both D and E are contenders.
D says that decreasing will increase the reading lvls.
E is eliminating alternate cause.

Let's dig in little more using LSAT Terminology
In order to - SC indicator.

Increase Reading lvls ---> Decreasing T.V viewing.

D is wrong reversal :) .
Decreasing T.V ---> Increasing Reading lvls.
Which is wrong.
Hence, D is wrong .

So Answer should be E.


Have you applied conditional reasoning?
sufficient--> necessary
on that basis it a wrong reversal.

are actual Gmat questions this tricky? that you have to apply conditional reasoning in an assumption question?
_________________

Utilize your 'today' to build up your tomorrow'!

.... Looking for some kudos here...

Kudos [?]: 25 [1], given: 168

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Posts: 468

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 50

Location: India
Schools: Duke '20, Tepper '20
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GPA: 4
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jun 2017, 04:37
tanvi9 wrote:
Have you applied conditional reasoning?
sufficient--> necessary
on that basis it a wrong reversal.

are actual Gmat questions this tricky? that you have to apply conditional reasoning in an assumption question?


Yeah once we cross 700, we will get some questions where conditional reasoning will be helpful to eliminate answers, while sometimes we need to use conditional reasoning to get answers especially in inference questions. :) .

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 50

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
S
Joined: 06 May 2014
Posts: 37

Kudos [?]: 25 [1], given: 168

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jun 2017, 04:42
1
This post received
KUDOS
Nightmare007 wrote:
tanvi9 wrote:
Have you applied conditional reasoning?
sufficient--> necessary
on that basis it a wrong reversal.

are actual Gmat questions this tricky? that you have to apply conditional reasoning in an assumption question?


Yeah once we cross 700, we will get some questions where conditional reasoning will be helpful to eliminate answers, while sometimes we need to use conditional reasoning to get answers especially in inference questions. :) .



Thanks for the explaination.
Also can you elaborate more on why negation failed here? I am quite confused now as what to be applied when.
_________________

Utilize your 'today' to build up your tomorrow'!

.... Looking for some kudos here...

Kudos [?]: 25 [1], given: 168

2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Posts: 468

Kudos [?]: 62 [2], given: 50

Location: India
Schools: Duke '20, Tepper '20
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GPA: 4
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jun 2017, 04:59
2
This post received
KUDOS
tanvi9 wrote:
Nightmare007 wrote:
tanvi9 wrote:
Have you applied conditional reasoning?
sufficient--> necessary
on that basis it a wrong reversal.

are actual Gmat questions this tricky? that you have to apply conditional reasoning in an assumption question?


Yeah once we cross 700, we will get some questions where conditional reasoning will be helpful to eliminate answers, while sometimes we need to use conditional reasoning to get answers especially in inference questions. :) .



Thanks for the explaination.
Also can you elaborate more on why negation failed here? I am quite confused now as what to be applied when.


SC --- > NC
A ---> B. - given .
We can conclude that - !B ---> !A.- contrapositive.
But
B ---> A - wrong reversal
!A -----> !B - wrong negation

+kudos if you find this useful.

Kudos [?]: 62 [2], given: 50

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
S
Joined: 06 May 2014
Posts: 37

Kudos [?]: 25 [1], given: 168

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jun 2017, 05:04
1
This post received
KUDOS
Thanks,

meanwhile i went back to conditional reasoning explanations and I guess will have to always judge in the stimulus only if conditional reasoning or casual relation occurs and then go to answer choices with the frame of mind.

kudos given
_________________

Utilize your 'today' to build up your tomorrow'!

.... Looking for some kudos here...

Kudos [?]: 25 [1], given: 168

1 KUDOS received
VP
VP
avatar
S
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1107

Kudos [?]: 20 [1], given: 1056

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jun 2017, 14:24
1
This post received
KUDOS
A is the answer for explanation question, B is the weakener
C,D cannot be assumption because of "if..."

Kudos [?]: 20 [1], given: 1056

CR Forum Moderator
avatar
P
Status: The best is yet to come.....
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 471

Kudos [?]: 198 [0], given: 191

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Aug 2017, 00:13
What would be the negated statement of option D?

D. If a child watches less television, his or her reading level will increase.

Below is my take:

If a child watches MORE television, his or her reading level will increase.

Any expert, please?
_________________

Hasan Mahmud

Kudos [?]: 198 [0], given: 191

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 31 Dec 2015
Posts: 16

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 116

CAT Tests
Re: Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Aug 2017, 00:34
GMATNInja- Please help me understand how the parents' methods are relevant in this case?

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 116

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Posts: 199

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 91

Re: Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Oct 2017, 03:01
Nightmare007 wrote:
tanvi9 wrote:
Mahmud6 wrote:
By negating D, we get

If a child watches MORE television, his or her reading level will increase--> this breaks down the conclusion.
So, why it is not OA?



I have the same doubt, because I choose D over E by applying negation only. otherwise if I just select on the basis of prethinking 'E' is a better option!
someone please explain!!

Hi,
I think my approach will help you.
MY analysis .
Premies : Increased T.V ----> not good reading lvls
Conclusion : Decrease in T.V ----> reading lvl increase.
A causal relationship is mentioned in the problem set.

I think both D and E are contenders.
D says that decreasing will increase the reading lvls.
E is eliminating alternate cause.

Let's dig in little more using LSAT Terminology
In order to - SC indicator.

Increase Reading lvls ---> Decreasing T.V viewing.

D is wrong reversal :) .
Decreasing T.V ---> Increasing Reading lvls.
Which is wrong.
Hence, D is wrong .

So Answer should be E.


Hi Nightmare,

is n't choice D, a wrong negation ?

Premise : watching more television (A) -> decreases reading levels (B)
D: watching less television( not A) -> increases reading grades (not B).

I eliminated D considering it as wrong negation and chose E. Please correct me if i am wrong

thanks

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 91

Re: Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not   [#permalink] 05 Oct 2017, 03:01
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Studies have shown that children who watch a lot of television do not

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.