It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 21:16

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 May 2004
Posts: 126

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Apr 2005, 07:51
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not properly value the preservation of human life. Although animal suffering is unfortunate, it is justifiable if it can lead to cures for human ailments.
Melvin: But much animal experimentation involves testing of ordinary consumer products such as soaps, dyes, and cosmetics.
Susan: These experiments are justifiable on the same grounds, since cleanliness, convenience, and beauty are worthwhile human values deserving of support.
Which of the following is the best statement of the logical flaw in Susan’s argument?
(A) Her claim that animal experimentation is justifiable if it supports human values contradicts her claim that such experimentation is justifiable only if it leads to cures for human ailments.
(B) She places a higher value on human cleanliness, convenience, and beauty than she does on the preservation of animal life.
(C) She uses the word “valueâ€

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 235

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Apr 2005, 10:18
A - not so sure though :?

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Dec 2004
Posts: 274

Kudos [?]: 200 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Apr 2005, 12:16
A for me. Rest don;t make sense.

(A) Her claim that animal experimentation is justifiable if it supports human values contradicts her claim that such experimentation is justifiable only if it leads to cures for human ailments.

Her statements do contradict and she ios shifting scope from one justification to another. This is a flaw. Correct.

(B) She places a higher value on human cleanliness, convenience, and beauty than she does on the preservation of animal life.

Not necessarily.

(C) She uses the word “valueâ€

Kudos [?]: 200 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 1480

Kudos [?]: 411 [0], given: 0

Location: Germany
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Apr 2005, 15:41
i dont think that its A), because she says "it can lead to cures for human ailments" and not that it "is justifiable only if it leads to cures for human ailments"

IMO its C) or E)

C) because she uses "value" in two different ways. first "preservation of life" which has stronger impact than her second describtion of values as "beauty" and "convenience"

E) in her first argument she point out the "preservation of life", but she does not support it in her second argument by saying that it supports human life. how does the support of human life actually save lifes ?

i think that C) is more a logical flaw than E) is. E) is more like the conclusion of the logicial flaw. so i will go with C)
_________________

If your mind can conceive it and your heart can believe it, have faith that you can achieve it.

Kudos [?]: 411 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 May 2004
Posts: 126

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 May 2005, 03:51
OA is E

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2004
Posts: 893

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 May 2005, 08:47
I also picked (C). What is problem with (C)? Please pour in ur thought!!!

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 May 2004
Posts: 126

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 May 2005, 04:20
I have got the same. C is really treacy. Any explanation is welcome.
_________________

Regards,
Wunderbar03

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

  [#permalink] 02 May 2005, 04:20
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.