mirzohidjon
Somebody in this forum suggested that you start reading solutions to OG verbal questions, even the wrong ones. That way you get used to common mistakes GMAT uses for its tests. It is a great help to boost your verbal score, i believe.
Been there and done that as well!! My problem is I have practically exhausted all of OG 11 and OG Verbal. Yet, I have been lacking at one thing.
Whenever I see a new SC or CR question, one that I haven't solved earlier and I don't seem to remember the answer, I immediately apply the strategies I have learnt from
MGMAT SC or Kaplan CR. For SC, I try to identify what is being tested in the question based on the categories
MGMAT SC postulates such as modifier problem, subject-verb agreement, idiom, pronoun referencing error, parallelism or compare-contrast etc. Once I figure out what is wrong, my ear tells me what sounds better, I look for that among the answer options and more often than not, find it. Most cases however, I don't and then I use the POE method, eliminating options that look horrible grammatically, boiling down to the best two.
Same goes with CR as well. When I read the stimulus, I make a mental picture of the context and try to figure out what kind of an argument could it possibly be based on the Kaplan CR categories such as scope-shift, alternate explanations, explain paradox, cause-and-effect etc. This helps me figure out very easily what is wrong with the argument, what is inferred from the facts, possible assumptions, what could strengthen or weaken it, and the like. However, bold-face questions and some conversation type questions get me into a jinx since I haven't been able to practise many of them.
RC I have no problem at all, it all depends on how interesting the passage would be. If it's social sciences like women empowerment movements or migration of african-americans from south to the north in the US in early 19th century and boring stuff like that, I just manage by going back to the passage, otherwise if it is an interesting science passage such as a scientific phenomenon or experiment or a research study and procedure used and the like, I love them. My strike rate has substantially improved on it's own without much effort since the beginning, of course, it's not a 100% though.
So as you see, there's nothing wrong with my approach and yet I stay at the early 30's levels. Any suggestions what can get me to late 40's???