Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
The company refused to disclose the details of their meeting; rather, they said there would be a press release forthcoming.
(A) The company refused to disclose the details of their meeting; rather, they said there would be a press release forthcoming.
(B) The company refused to disclose the details of its meeting; rather, they said there would be a press release forthcoming.
(C) The company refused to disclose the details of its meeting; rather, it said there would be a press release forthcoming.
(D) The company refused to disclose the details of its meeting; rather, a spokesperson said that there would be a press release forthcoming.
(E) The company refused to disclose the details of their meeting; rather, a spokesperson said that there would be a press release forthcoming.
Please explain your answer. I'll post the OA in two days.
Show more
I think it is between C and D, others you can eliminate for subejct verb agreement error. D is better becuase it uses that to introduce subsequent phrase.
D
I remember from somewhere that a semicolon in GMAT SCs requires the the sentence on either side to be able to stand on its own. With that logic, D is the best choice for me.
Company is a singular noun, so (A) and (E) are out because they use the wrong pronoun 'their'.
The same problem with (B) which used "they'
Between (C) and (D), I'll go with D. I think a spokesperson said is better than 'it said' since a company can't really speaK (literall)
D for me.
I dont buy it.. The company can REFUSE, but can not SPEAK..
I dont think it has anything to do with it.
I think you need a semicolon to show a relation of first IC with the second. Otherwise, you can seperate the 2 sentences by a full stop.
I will Pick D because D has THAT after said... which is missing in C.
Show more
Well, the OA is D. But, the OE is bit confounding. Also the OE missed to point out the usage of "that" after "said" in choice C. By the way, this question is from Kaplan Qbank.
OE:
Choice (C) is tempting, except that a company cannot actually say anything; it is an entity, and so "it said" is incorrect. Choice (D) specifies a spokesperson as the speaker, making the sentence clear.
My question is as same as riteshgupta1's. If company cannot speak (in literal terms), then it cannot refuse (in literal terms). On the other hand, I have a vague memory that I heard/read in newspapers that have sentences like "Company XYZ refused the offer,â€
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.