Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 07:18 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 07:18

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 679
Own Kudos [?]: 198 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Feb 2005
Posts: 116
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Rockville
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 113
Own Kudos [?]: 36 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Feb 2005
Posts: 116
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Rockville
Send PM
Re: The director of the conservatory emphasized to the new [#permalink]
Hey Prep Gmat
can u elaborate on your explanation for D?
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2004
Posts: 378
Own Kudos [?]: 224 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The director of the conservatory emphasized to the new [#permalink]
Is it not a question of Subjunctive Mood (requirement)?? :roll:

I will go with (A)..
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 113
Own Kudos [?]: 36 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The director of the conservatory emphasized to the new [#permalink]
Here is something that nocilis wrote on additive phrases a day or so ago:
And is the only additive that can make two singular subjects in to a plural one.

In addition to, not only X but also Y, etc. will not make the singular subjects in to a plural.


The boys, in addition to the girls, are participating in the games.

In the above example you gave, it is not in addition that makes the subject plural, it is the plural subject boys that makes it plural.

Even if your sentence were:
1) The boy, in addition to the girl, is participating in the games. -> still singular
2) The boy, in addition to the girls, is participating in the games. -> still Singular.

I am not sure if the question is about subjunctive mood, even if it is I think you cant mix 'that' and 'to' construction.
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 2004
Own Kudos [?]: 1899 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Singapore
Send PM
Re: The director of the conservatory emphasized to the new [#permalink]
(A) - grammatically wrong ("not only talent")
(B) - subject-verb (musicians require, not requires)
(D) - not as concise as c
(E) - needs to become, instead of becoming

(C) for me
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 113
Own Kudos [?]: 36 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The director of the conservatory emphasized to the new [#permalink]
the original sentence mentions 'necessity' as opposed to 'requirement'. kind of necessary/sufficient condition stuff in SC?. I think we are expected to look for such subtelities in SC?.
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 2004
Own Kudos [?]: 1899 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Singapore
Send PM
Re: The director of the conservatory emphasized to the new [#permalink]
but doesn't require and nescessary mean the same thing.

e.g.
You will require a password to go through this door.
A password is nescessary in order to pass through this door.

From the webster-merrian online dictionary:

Nescessary: absolutely needed : REQUIRED
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 687
Own Kudos [?]: 1448 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Germany
Send PM
Re: The director of the conservatory emphasized to the new [#permalink]
C) !

D) incorrect becauce it distorts the meaning "not only talent but also hard work was necessary" it still is necessary...

C) "becoming" is better because it describes an ongoing process
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 2004
Own Kudos [?]: 1899 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Singapore
Send PM
Re: The director of the conservatory emphasized to the new [#permalink]
Good point, chris. I failed to see the tense 'was'.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 113
Own Kudos [?]: 36 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The director of the conservatory emphasized to the new [#permalink]
Yes, continuous tense makes sense. Thanks Christoph.
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 679
Own Kudos [?]: 198 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The director of the conservatory emphasized to the new [#permalink]
christoph wrote:
C) !

D) incorrect becauce it distorts the meaning "not only talent but also hard work was necessary" it still is necessary...

C) "becoming" is better because it describes an ongoing process


Isn't the whole sentence in past tense, then why there is an issue with the usage of "was" in choice "D" ? Or is it becose of the subjunctive mood.
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 1581
Own Kudos [?]: 642 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Location: New York City
Concentration: Social Enterprise
Schools:Wharton'11 HBS'12
Send PM
Re: The director of the conservatory emphasized to the new [#permalink]
C it is ....reason for me, is that its short and sweet!

gets rid of all the other "fatty" words!...cant really explain what else is good about C.

however, the rest all suffer from wordiness and in some options wrong idiom....i think it should be "to become"....some options have that wrong.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Feb 2005
Posts: 32
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Lahore, Pakistan
Send PM
Re: The director of the conservatory emphasized to the new [#permalink]
always prefer infinitive over gerund. then A and D are left. In A, 'were' does not agree with 'hardwork'. so, D is the right answer.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Jan 2005
Posts: 48
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The director of the conservatory emphasized to the new [#permalink]
christoph wrote:
C) !

D) incorrect becauce it distorts the meaning "not only talent but also hard work was necessary" it still is necessary...

C) "becoming" is better because it describes an ongoing process



I would pick D. Straight forward and correct. respecting tense and meaning.
"Becoming and the on going process " mmmmmm? I don t understand the flow behind that statement.
I thought :
either you are successful or you are not.. you are not in the process of beeing successful. the wish, desire and will of beeing successful can be an on going process but not the fact that you are.

He is successful because he s having success.
I duno if I am clear.
anyway we are waiting for the OA
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Oct 2004
Posts: 188
Own Kudos [?]: 12 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The director of the conservatory emphasized to the new [#permalink]
D for me.

A) to become successful musicians not only talent but also hard work were necessary INCORRECT
(B) in order to be successful musicians requires hard work as well as talent INCORRECT [ TENSE, UNIDIOMATIC]
(C) becoming a successful musician requires hard work as well as talent
[BECOMING....REQUIRES...UNIDIOMATIC. TO BECOME APPROPRIATE.
(D) not only talent but also hard work was necessary to become a successful musician CORRECT! I DON'T SEE ANYTHING WRONG WITH WAS, IT SURELY STILL IS BUT THAT IS NOT THE MAIN POINT IN THE QUESTION. THE TENSE USAGE IS ACCURATE.
(E) both hard work and talent were necessary for them becoming successful musicians INCORRECT.


The more I see it, i am convinced that becoming is incorrect. To become is probably the correct usage.

OA Banerjee??
What is the source of this question. Good ones.
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 679
Own Kudos [?]: 198 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The director of the conservatory emphasized to the new [#permalink]
jpv wrote:
banerjee.. Please post OA...



oops my bad, OA is "C", no OE.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Sentence Correction (EA only) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The director of the conservatory emphasized to the new [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
Current Student
278 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne