GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 19 Jan 2019, 21:26

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in January
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### FREE Quant Workshop by e-GMAT!

January 20, 2019

January 20, 2019

07:00 AM PST

07:00 AM PST

Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score.
• ### Free GMAT Strategy Webinar

January 19, 2019

January 19, 2019

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.

# The employer from a prestigious well-known production compan

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 24 Jul 2013
Posts: 9
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
The employer from a prestigious well-known production compan  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jan 2014, 10:28
3
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

53% (01:11) correct 47% (01:24) wrong based on 308 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The employer from a prestigious well-known production company will appear in court tomorrow, because he lets all the employees affiliated with his political party to take two days off per month.

(A)
he lets all the employees affiliated with his political party to take
(B)
of letting all the employees that are affiliated with his political party take
(C)
of letting all the employees affiliated with his political party to take
(D)
he let all the employees affiliated with his political party take
(E)
he let all the employees who were affiliated with his political party taking

Source: go gmat platform
Intern
Joined: 20 Feb 2011
Posts: 6
Re: The employer from a prestigious well-known production compan  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jan 2014, 14:41
ftwsday wrote:
The employer from a prestigious well-known production company will appear in court tomorrow, because he lets all the employees affiliated with his political party to take two days off per month.

(A)
he lets all the employees affiliated with his political party to take
(B)
of letting all the employees that are affiliated with his political party take
(C)
of letting all the employees affiliated with his political party to take
(D)
he let all the employees affiliated with his political party take
(E)
he let all the employees who were affiliated with his political party taking

(A) Idiom. The verb let is followed by an infinitive without to (“to let somebody do something”).(B) Relative pronoun who should be used instead of that to refer to employees. Because of letting is an awkward and wordy construction.(C) Because of letting is an awkward constrcution. Also, letting should be followed take without the particle to.(D) Correct (note the verb let is in the past tense).(E) Same as in A.

Source: go gmat platform

I think D is not the correct OA. Explanation below -

D& E are out because of Sub verb not agreeing in number (He - Singular; let - Plural)
In A & C, "to take" in not required. The author of this sentence is not showing any intent by using "to take" , but rather stating a fact - So I think "take" should be used.
Hence B is the correct answer.
Manager
Status: Final Lap
Joined: 25 Oct 2012
Posts: 233
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.54
WE: Project Management (Retail Banking)
Re: The employer from a prestigious well-known production compan  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jan 2014, 06:51
2
Hi,

D is correct because Let is the past tense of itself. So it has not to be agree with number .. and in option D, the second event as a whole occured in the past ( let all the employees affiliated take two days off) that's why The employer will appear in court tomorrow
_________________

KUDOS is the good manner to help the entire community.

Manager
Status: Student
Joined: 26 Aug 2013
Posts: 183
Location: France
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Schools: EMLYON FT'16
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V32
GPA: 3.44
Re: The employer from a prestigious well-known production compan  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jan 2014, 09:18
1
ftwsday wrote:
The employer from a prestigious well-known production company will appear in court tomorrow, because he lets all the employees affiliated with his political party to take two days off per month.

(A)
he lets all the employees affiliated with his political party to take
(B)
of letting all the employees that are affiliated with his political party take
(C)
of letting all the employees affiliated with his political party to take
(D)
he let all the employees affiliated with his political party take
(E)
he let all the employees who were affiliated with his political party taking

(A) Idiom. The verb let is followed by an infinitive without to (“to let somebody do something”).(B) Relative pronoun who should be used instead of that to refer to employees. Because of letting is an awkward and wordy construction.(C) Because of letting is an awkward constrcution. Also, letting should be followed take without the particle to.(D) Correct (note the verb let is in the past tense).(E) Same as in A.

Source: go gmat platform

Hi,

You need subjonctive here; Because he let X

A B C are out.

E is wordy and have to many useless words!

hih
_________________

Think outside the box

Intern
Joined: 24 Jul 2013
Posts: 9
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Re: The employer from a prestigious well-known production compan  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jan 2014, 10:33
Rock750 wrote:
Hi,

D is correct because Let is the past tense of itself. So it has not to be agree with number .. and in option D, the second event as a whole occured in the past ( let all the employees affiliated take two days off) that's why The employer will appear in court tomorrow

Hi
But, in my opinion, sentense should be in the present tense:
He let them two days off two days off per month
Original sentense sounds like he is doing it every month.
Correct me if I wrong.
Manager
Joined: 11 Jan 2014
Posts: 88
Concentration: Finance, Statistics
GMAT Date: 03-04-2014
GPA: 3.77
WE: Analyst (Retail Banking)
Re: The employer from a prestigious well-known production compan  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jan 2014, 10:40
2
1
(A) he lets all the employees affiliated with his political party to take. Wrong grammar
(B) of letting all the employees that are affiliated with his political party take Wordy
(C) of letting all the employees affiliated with his political party to take Wordy + awkward structure
(D) he let all the employees affiliated with his political party take Correct, the act of letting his employees should be in the past, which it is (let) + it finishes on a good note, "take" and not "to take".
(E) he let all the employees who were affiliated with his political party taking Wordy + wrong grammar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2911
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: The employer from a prestigious well-known production compan  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Jan 2017, 09:27
2
Let someone to do / doing something is wrong...should be let someone do something. Therefore A,C and E can be eliminated.

The pronoun "that" cannot be used to refer to person/people. Hence option B is wrong.

D is the correct option.
Intern
Joined: 13 Feb 2018
Posts: 11
Re: The employer from a prestigious well-known production compan  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2018, 08:34
sayantanc2k wrote:
Let someone to do / doing something is wrong...should be let someone do something. Therefore A,C and E can be eliminated.

The pronoun "that" cannot be used to refer to person/people. Hence option B is wrong.

D is the correct option.

Hi. Is there anything wrong with option B, other than the use of pronoun, particularly the use of 'of letting'?
Re: The employer from a prestigious well-known production compan &nbs [#permalink] 31 Jul 2018, 08:34
Display posts from previous: Sort by