The Eureka effect is a psychological term that refers to the sudden

Question

The Eureka effect is a psychological term that refers to the sudden comprehension of previously incomprehensible problems or concepts; this effect is considered highly beneficial in fields that require great creativity in problem solving, such as higher-level mathematics, but it is also incredibly nebulous and almost impossible to induce. Is there any method that could detect a nascent Eureka effect, allowing an individual to take steps to bring it to fruition? Such a method could be developed by monitoring brain activity; researchers scanned the brains of mathematicians working on novel math problems and found that a few minutes before the mathematicians experienced a breakthrough, they experienced heightened activity in region A of their brains. The researchers concluded that monitoring region A could allow one to predict an incoming Eureka effect.

Which of the following, if true, most supports the researchers' conclusion?

A. Other research found that whenever significant activity occurs in region A, it is almost always with creative problem solving, soon before the Eureka effect occurs. 
B. Sometimes, once the Eureka effect took place, activity in those regions of the brain associated with cognitive effort increased.
C. The cognitive effort required for creative problem solving diminishes significantly, as one gains more experience working on that particular type of problem.
D. The increased activity in region A began at least a minute before the Eureka effect occurred. 
E. Increased activity in region A was accompanied by decreased activity in regions that become active during artistic imagination.

This is a  CR Butler Question

Check the links to other Butler Projects:
 
  Data Sufficiency Butler  
  Problem Solving Butler  
  Sentence Correction Butler  
  Reading Comprehension Butler  
  Integrated Reasoning Butler

Dereno · Answer

This question has made my mind traverse back to school days, and to the initial roots when for the first instance I heard about the story of Eureka, Archimedes and Laws of Buoyancy.

Eureka effect is named after the famous person who invented the law of buoyancy, Archimedes. The passage is about the Eureka effect and the associated impacts in the brain. This explains the sudden comprehension of previously incomprehensible problems, and associated cognitive activity at certain centres of the brain. Can it be induced artificially? The answer is complex and tedious, not possible.

So, the subsequent question was , can the arrival of eureka effect be correctly identified ? That’s nascent eureka effect be identified correctly?

Researchers worked on it, and identified that during solving complex math problems,  just few minutes  before the arrival of the answer, the brain showed heightened activity at brain region A.

So, the conclusion of the researchers was monitoring the region A we can be sure that Eureka effect is about to arrive.

We need to strengthen the conclusion.

Monitoring Region A —-> showing heightened activity at region A ———-> detect nascent Eureka effect.

A. Other research found that whenever significant activity occurs in region A, it is almost always with creative problem solving, soon before the Eureka effect occurs.

This is the correct answer, this mentions about other parallel research, heightened brain activity, which is always associated with the creative problem solving, which occurs moments before the Eureka effect. Significant activity in Region A of the brain, where the creative problem solving is done is the precursor for eureka effect.

B. Sometimes, once the Eureka effect took place, activity in those regions of the brain associated with cognitive effort increased.

This option mentions, the brain activity post eureka effect. But, actually we are concerned with the pre onset of eureka moment and associated brain activity. Hence, wrong.

C. The cognitive effort required for creative problem solving diminishes significantly, as one gains more experience working on that particular type of problem.

This is not a correct answer, this option explains how repetitive effort in problem solving has affected the activity’s level in certain regions of brain. Hence, Wrong. 
 
D. The increased activity in region A began at least a minute before the Eureka effect occurred.

The passage mentions heightened activity at region A, a few minutes before the Eureka moment. This narrows down to a specific time frame of 1 minute at least, before eureka occurrence. The focus is not on the time frame, but the sequence. Hence, Wrong.

E. Increased activity in region A was accompanied by decreased activity in regions that become active during artistic imagination.

This option provides a complete analysis of brain activity, while we are not focused on the big picture. Our analysis is narrowed down to region A alone. Hence, Wrong.

Option A

Sneha_0410 · Answer

Correct Answer: A

A. Other research found that whenever significant activity occurs in region A, it is almost always with creative problem solving, soon before the Eureka effect occurs.
  This strongly supports the researcher’s conclusion. Since the Eureka effect is associated with creative thinking, the additional research reinforces the reasoning that Region A shows notable activity before the Eureka effect occurs. This insight is valuable for predicting when the Eureka effect will happen.

B. Sometimes, once the Eureka effect took place, activity in those regions of the brain associated with cognitive effort increased.
  What happens after the Eureka effect is not our concern; our focus is on predicting the factors that occur before it takes place.

C. The cognitive effort required for creative problem solving diminishes significantly, as one gains more experience working on that particular type of problem.
  Again, what happens after is not our concern.

D. The increased activity in region A began at least a minute before the Eureka effect occurred.
  This could be considered a fact, but it is not the strongest evidence to support the researcher’s conclusion. Moreover, the activity mentioned here is not clearly defined as being related to problem-solving.

E. Increased activity in region A was accompanied by decreased activity in regions that become active during artistic imagination.
  Artistic imagination is out of scope, and we are not concerned with activity in other regions.

ExpertsGlobal5 · Answer

Explanation:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2YoKvjumVcc

The Eureka effect is a psychological term that refers to the sudden

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) Questions

The Eureka effect is a psychological term that refers to the sudden

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards