Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Originally posted by Bunuel on 27 Jan 2021, 07:30.
Last edited by Bunuel on 19 Nov 2024, 04:44, edited 6 times in total.
Moved to new forum
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
25
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Show timer
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide Answer
Correct Answer
Hide
Show
History
Dropdown 1: 4
Dropdown 2: 38%
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Select the dropdowns below and click "Submit" to add this question to your Error log.
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
48%
(03:27)
correct 52%
(03:43)
wrong
based on 428
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The graph above shows the proportions of 9 material categories comprising 254 million tons of municipal solid waste in 2013 before potential recycling.
Select from each drop-down menu the option that creates the most accurate statement based on the information provided.
If 50% of paper waste and 35% of metal waste were recycled in 2013, then the amount of recycled paper, in tons, would be approximately times that of recycled metal waste.
If the weight of plastic waste remained the same in 2014 while the weight of total waste increased by 10% from 2013 to 2014, and the increase in tons was evenly distributed across the other eight categories, then a increase would represent the greatest percent increase in tons of waste for any of the eight categories from 2013 to 2014.
The graph above shows the proportions of 9 material categories comprising 254 million tons of municipal solid waste in 2013 before potential recycling.
Select from each drop-down menu the option that creates the most accurate statement based on the information provided.
If 50% of paper waste and 35% of metal waste were recycled in 2013, then the amount of recycled paper, in tons, would be approximately times that of recycled metal waste.
If the weight of plastic waste remained the same in 2014 while the weight of total waste increased by 10% from 2013 to 2014, and the increase in tons was evenly distributed across the other eight categories, then a increase would represent the greatest percent increase in tons of waste for any of the eight categories from 2013 to 2014.
Show more
Drop-down 1:
Paper waste contributes 27% of the total waste. Since 50% of that was recycled, 13.5% of paper waste was recycled. Metal waste contributes 9.1% of the total waste. Since 35% of that was recycled, approximately 3.2% of metal waste was recycled. Therefore, the amount of recycled paper was approximately \(\frac{13.5}{3.2} \approx 4.2\) times that of recycled metal waste.
Drop-down 1:
The total waste increased by 10% from 2013 to 2014, accounting for a 25.4 million ton increase in total waste. Since this increase was evenly distributed across the eight categories, each category increased by \(\frac{25.4}{8} \approx 3.2\) million tons of waste. The addition of 3.2 million tons would result in the greatest percentage increase for the waste category with the least waste in 2013. That category was Glass, which accounted for 3.3% of 254 million tons, approximately 8.4 million tons. The increase of 3.2 million tons would constitute an increase of \(\frac{3.2}{8.4} * 100 \approx 38\%\).
1. The amount of recycled paper waste would be equal to \(50\% * 27\% * 254 = 34.29\) million tons and the amount of recycled metal waste would be equal to \(35\% * 9.1\% * 254 = 8.0899\) million tons. The ratio is equal to \(\frac{34.29}{8.0899} \approx 4.24\), which is closest to 4.
2. A 10% increase distributed over 8 categories is the same as \(10\% * 254 * \frac{1}{8} = 3.175\) million tons being distributed to each category apart from plastic waste. This would be the greatest percent increase for the category with the smallest amount - glass, which would go from \(3.3\% * 254 = 8.382\) to \(8.382 + 3.175 = 11.557\) million tons. This is a \(\frac{3.175}{8.382} * 100\% \approx 37.88\%\), which is closest to 38%.
1. 0.5 of paper waste = k times 0.35 of metal waste 0.5*0.27*254=k*0.35*0.09*254 k=0.5*0.27/0.35*0.09 ~ 4 times 2. total waste increases by 10% i.e. 25.4 ton which is evenly distributed among all other 8 categories than plastic waste. hence all the values in the other categories increase by 25.4/8=3.2 ton now since lowest value of the waste is of glass i.e. 3.3% so will have the greatest %age increase which is 3.2/3.3*2.54 slightly less than 40%~~38%