Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 1912:30 PM EST
-01:30 PM EST
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2001:30 PM EST
-02:30 PM IST
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2407:00 PM PST
-08:00 PM PST
Full-length FE mock with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
65%
(hard)
Question Stats:
63% (02:22) correct
37%
(02:30)
wrong
based on 781
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The level of lead contamination in United States rivers declined between 1975 and 1985. Federal regulations requiring a drop in industrial discharges of lead went into effect in 1975, but the major cause of the decline was a 75 percent drop in the use of leaded gasoline between 1975 and 1985.
Which of the following, if true, best supports the claim that the major cause of the decline in the level of lead contamination in United States rives was the decline in the use of leaded gasoline?
(A) The level of lead contamination in United States rivers fell sharply in both 1975 and 1983.
(B) Most of the decline in industrial discharges of lead occurred before 1976, but the largest decline in the level of river contamination occurred between 1980 and 1985.
(C) Levels of lead contamination in rivers fell sharply in 1975-1976 and rose very slightly over the next nine years.
(D) Levels of lead contamination rose in those rivers where there was reduced river flow due to drought.
(E) Although the use of leaded gasoline declined 75 percent between 1975 and 1985, 80 percent of the decline took place in 1985.
Which of the following, if true, best supports the claim that the major cause of the decline in the level of lead contamination in United States rives was the decline in the use of leaded gasoline?
(A) The level of lead contamination in United States rivers fell sharply in both 1975 and 1983.
(B) Most of the decline in industrial discharges of lead occurred before 1976, but the largest decline in the level of river contamination occurred between 1980 and 1985.
(C) Levels of lead contamination in rivers fell sharply in 1975-1976 and rose very slightly over the next nine years.
(D) Levels of lead contamination rose in those rivers where there was reduced river flow due to drought.
(E) Although the use of leaded gasoline declined 75 percent between 1975 and 1985, 80 percent of the decline took place in 1985.
14 Mar 2010, 12:16
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hey All,
Seems to be a bit of back and forth on this, so I thought I'd try to take it on using the (dreaded) process. I know, I know. Nothing's less fun then taking notes...but let's do it anyway:
Conclusion: Major cause of decline in LC was decline in lead gas [It's pretty common to find the conclusion in the question stem...so always be on the lookout]
Premises: Decline between 75 and 85. Feds said industrial discharge down in 1975. 75% drop in lead gasoline between 75 and 85.
Assumption: Industrial discharge didn't do it. [Basically, we're looking for something to downplay the importance of the legislation.]
(A) The level of lead contamination in United States rivers fell sharply in both 1975 and 1983.
PROBLEM: This would possibly weaken. We wouldn't want to see sharp declines, because it sounds like the drop was gradual (as lead gas was phased out).
(B) Most of the decline in industrial discharges of lead occurred before 1976, but the largest decline in the level of river contamination occurred between 1980 and 1985.
ANSWER: Well, if the industrial decline occurred before 1976, that means that the effect of the legislation was almost immediate. But if the contamination dropped mostly between 80 and 85, that could only be because of the rise of unleaded gas.
(C) Levels of lead contamination in rivers fell sharply in 1975-1976 and rose very slightly over the next nine years.
PROBLEM: This weakens a lot. This sounds like the legislation had a big effect, and then nothing happened for the rest of the time. We wanted gas to slowly make things better, but they're actually getting worse!
(D) Levels of lead contamination rose in those rivers where there was reduced river flow due to drought.
PROBLEM: This doesn't connect to either industry or gas, so it's irrelevant.
(E) Although the use of leaded gasoline declined 75 percent between 1975 and 1985, 80 percent of the decline took place in 1985.
PROBLEM: Alright. Here's the toughie. The problem is that this doesn't actually add any information that we didn't have in the passage itself. Looks like it does, doesn't it? But think about it. We already knew the use of leaded gasoline declined 75 percent between 75 and 85 (that part is LITERALLY in the passage word for word). Then we're just told that most of it happened at the end. So what? That doesn't tell us anything about the contamination itself. What we really wanted was to WEAKEN the influence of the legislation, which B does.
Hope that helps!
-t
Seems to be a bit of back and forth on this, so I thought I'd try to take it on using the (dreaded) process. I know, I know. Nothing's less fun then taking notes...but let's do it anyway:
Conclusion: Major cause of decline in LC was decline in lead gas [It's pretty common to find the conclusion in the question stem...so always be on the lookout]
Premises: Decline between 75 and 85. Feds said industrial discharge down in 1975. 75% drop in lead gasoline between 75 and 85.
Assumption: Industrial discharge didn't do it. [Basically, we're looking for something to downplay the importance of the legislation.]
(A) The level of lead contamination in United States rivers fell sharply in both 1975 and 1983.
PROBLEM: This would possibly weaken. We wouldn't want to see sharp declines, because it sounds like the drop was gradual (as lead gas was phased out).
(B) Most of the decline in industrial discharges of lead occurred before 1976, but the largest decline in the level of river contamination occurred between 1980 and 1985.
ANSWER: Well, if the industrial decline occurred before 1976, that means that the effect of the legislation was almost immediate. But if the contamination dropped mostly between 80 and 85, that could only be because of the rise of unleaded gas.
(C) Levels of lead contamination in rivers fell sharply in 1975-1976 and rose very slightly over the next nine years.
PROBLEM: This weakens a lot. This sounds like the legislation had a big effect, and then nothing happened for the rest of the time. We wanted gas to slowly make things better, but they're actually getting worse!
(D) Levels of lead contamination rose in those rivers where there was reduced river flow due to drought.
PROBLEM: This doesn't connect to either industry or gas, so it's irrelevant.
(E) Although the use of leaded gasoline declined 75 percent between 1975 and 1985, 80 percent of the decline took place in 1985.
PROBLEM: Alright. Here's the toughie. The problem is that this doesn't actually add any information that we didn't have in the passage itself. Looks like it does, doesn't it? But think about it. We already knew the use of leaded gasoline declined 75 percent between 75 and 85 (that part is LITERALLY in the passage word for word). Then we're just told that most of it happened at the end. So what? That doesn't tell us anything about the contamination itself. What we really wanted was to WEAKEN the influence of the legislation, which B does.
Hope that helps!
-t
General Discussion
18 Mar 2009, 23:07
Kudos
Bookmarks
why not B?
Its saying
Most of the decline in industrial discharges of lead occurred before 1976, but the largest decline in the level of river contamination occurred between 1980 and 1985.
Its saying
Most of the decline in industrial discharges of lead occurred before 1976, but the largest decline in the level of river contamination occurred between 1980 and 1985.
