Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
This topic is for grammar-based True/false questions that may be fun to practice with to test your English Grammar knowledge
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
The major economic difference between standard 4-stroke engine and rotary is that rotary engines are less fuel efficient, but theoretically cheaper to build. However, currently only a few rotary engines are made and costs are consequently higher than for 4-stroke engines. Disagreements over the relative efficiency of then two systems are therefore related not just to their fuel efficiencies, but also to the way in which future production volumes will impact manufacturing costs.
THE PRICE OF THE FUEL IS NOT RELEVANT TO DISCUSSIONS ABOUT THE RELATIVE EFFICIENCY OF CAR ENGINES.
The major economic difference between standard 4-stroke engine and rotary is that rotary engines are less fuel efficient, but theoretically cheaper to build. However, currently only a few rotary engines are made and costs are consequently higher than for 4-stroke engines. Disagreements over the relative efficiency of then two systems are therefore related not just to their fuel efficiencies, but also to the way in which future production volumes will impact manufacturing costs.
IF ROTARY ENGINES WERE MORE FUEL-EFFICIENT THAN 4-STROKE ENGINES, THEY WOULD DEFINITELY HAVE THE ECONOMIC ADVANTAGE
7% of brazilian companies reported using the new software for purchasing, of which almost 46% reported that it generated only minimal cost savings, 9% reported it generated material savings, 28% stated that they could not yet determine its impact on costs, while the remainder said that no savings had been made.
The majority of respondents used the software for purchasing.
The major economic difference between standard 4-stroke engine and rotary is that rotary engines are less fuel efficient, but theoretically cheaper to build. However, currently only a few rotary engines are made and costs are consequently higher than for 4-stroke engines. Disagreements over the relative efficiency of then two systems are therefore related not just to their fuel efficiencies, but also to the way in which future production volumes will impact manufacturing costs.
1. THE PRICE OF THE FUEL IS NOT RELEVANT TO DISCUSSIONS ABOUT THE RELATIVE EFFICIENCY OF CAR ENGINES.
TRUE FALSE CANT SAY ITS TRUE OR FALSE
2. IF ROTARY ENGINES WEREMORE FUEL-EFFICIENT THAN 4-STROKE ENGINES, THEY WOULD DEFINITELY HAVE THE ECONOMIC ADVANTAGE
TRUE FALSE CANT SAY ITS TRUE OR FALSE
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.