Bunuel
The minister had expected brickbats, complaints, and pessimism, instead what greeted him was bouquets, praise, and optimism.
(A) had expected brickbats, complaints, and pessimism, instead what greeted him was bouquets, praise, and optimism
(B) was expecting brickbats, complaints, and pessimism, and was greeted by bouquets, praise, and optimism
(C) had expected brickbats, complaints, and pessimism; instead he was greeted by bouquets, praise, and optimism
(D) expected brickbats, complaints, and pessimism, however what greeted him was bouquets, praise, and optimism
(E) expecting brickbats, complaints, and pessimism, was instead greeted by bouquets, praise, and optimism
Official Explanation:
Answer: C
(A) The use of a comma to connect two independent clauses is incorrect. Also, what greeted the minister
were (and not
was) three things.
(B) The use of
and fails to demonstrate the contrast inherent in the two clauses. Also
the minister’s expectations need to be in the past perfect tense because the
expectations were there before the
greeting (which is in the simple past tense greeted).
(C) The correct answer.(D)
However needs to be preceded by a semicolon when it is used to connect two independent clauses. Also, what greeted the minister
were (and not
was) three things.
(E) This is a fragment because the helping verb (
was, had been, etc.) is missing from before
expecting