Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0%
(00:00)
correct 0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 0
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The movie Zed Square has received critical acclaim as well as mass appreciation as it has broken all yesteryears' records at the box office as well as at each of the major movie award ceremonies. It is ironical, however, that the two lead actors and the head director are the only ones who seem to be getting all the credit for the masterpiece. True, they did full justice to their roles and if it were not for their performances, the movie would not have achieved such path-breaking success. However, imagine what the movie would have been if it had outdated special effects, incoherent background score, poor editing, or shabby cinematography? Clearly, the media must do more to pass the credit to the talented contributors who are away from the limelight.
In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
a) The first is a finding that the argument as a whole seeks to discuss; the second is evidence that calls that finding into question.
b) The first is a finding that the argument as a whole seeks to discuss; the second is a consideration that has been used to support the main conclusion of the argument.
c) The first is a claim that the argument as a whole seeks to evaluate; the second is a judgment that calls the claim into question.
d) The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence that calls the conclusion into question.
e) Both first and second are evidence that have been used to support the main conclusion of the argument
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
The movie Zed Square has received critical acclaim as well as mass appreciation as it has broken all yesteryears' records at the box office as well as at each of the major movie award ceremonies. It is ironical, however, that the two lead actors and the head director are the only ones who seem to be getting all the credit for the masterpiece. True, they did full justice to their roles and if it were not for their performances, the movie would not have achieved such path-breaking success. However, imagine what the movie would have been if it had outdated special effects, incoherent background score, poor editing, or shabby cinematography? Clearly, the media must do more to pass the credit to the talented contributors who are away from the limelight.
In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
a) The first is a finding that the argument as a whole seeks to discuss; the second is evidence that calls that finding into question.
b) The first is a finding that the argument as a whole seeks to discuss; the second is a consideration that has been used to support the main conclusion of the argument.
c) The first is a claim that the argument as a whole seeks to evaluate; the second is a judgment that calls the claim into question.
d) The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence that calls the conclusion into question.
e) Both first and second are evidence that have been used to support the main conclusion of the argument
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.