It is currently 18 Oct 2017, 07:56

Live Now:

GMAT Verbal Live on YouTube: Join Now!


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

5 KUDOS received
CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3454

Kudos [?]: 918 [5], given: 781

The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Sep 2003, 11:10
5
This post received
KUDOS
12
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

64% (01:39) correct 36% (01:50) wrong based on 539 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

13. The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45 percent of homes now have smoke detectors, whereas only 30 percent of homes had them 10 years ago. This makes early detection of house fires no more likely, however, because over half of the domestic smoke detectors are either without batteries or else inoperative for some other reason.

In order for the conclusion above to be properly drawn, which one of the following assumptions would have to be made?

(A) Fifteen percent of domestic smoke detectors were installed less than 10 years ago.

(B) The number of fires per year in homes with smoke detectors has increased.

(C) Not all of the smoke detectors in homes are battery operated.

(D) The proportion of domestic smoke detectors that are inoperative has increased in the past ten years.

(E) Unlike automatic water sprinklers, a properly functioning smoke detector cannot by itself increase fire safety in a home.

Source: LSAT
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by broall on 20 Sep 2017, 02:44, edited 1 time in total.
Reformatted question

Kudos [?]: 918 [5], given: 781

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1603

Kudos [?]: 303 [0], given: 0

Re: The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Sep 2003, 12:41
I vote for D. If the proportion of domestic smoke detectors that are inoperative had decreased in the past ten years, then this would have made early detection of house fires more likely.

Kudos [?]: 303 [0], given: 0

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1603

Kudos [?]: 303 [0], given: 0

Re: The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Sep 2003, 11:31
The negation rule really works.

Kudos [?]: 303 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10117

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jul 2015, 01:09
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

Expert Post
Optimus Prep Instructor
User avatar
B
Joined: 06 Nov 2014
Posts: 1905

Kudos [?]: 522 [0], given: 23

Re: The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jul 2015, 10:19
The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45 percent of homes now have smoke detectors, whereas only 30 percent of homes had them 10 years ago. This makes early detection of house fires no more likely, however, because over half of the domestic smoke detectors are either without batteries or else inoperative for some other reason.

The conclusion is that smoke detectors are still not effective despite the increase in their prevalence because many of them don't function (due to lack of batteries or other issue).

In order for the conclusion above to be properly drawn, which one of the following assumptions would have to be made?

(A) Fifteen percent of domestic smoke detectors were installed less than 10 years ago.
not relevant
(B) The number of fires per year in homes with smoke detectors has increased.
not relevant
(C) Not all of the smoke detectors in homes are battery operated.
There are also other reasons that they are inoperative.
(D) The proportion of domestic smoke detectors that are inoperative has increased in the past ten years.
If just as many detectors were inoperative in the past, their current inefficacy can't be attributed to malfunction.
(E) Unlike automatic water sprinklers, a properly functioning smoke detector cannot by itself increase fire safety in a home. out of scope
_________________

Janielle Williams

Customer Support

Special Offer: $80-100/hr. Online Private Tutoring
GMAT On Demand Course $299
Free Online Trial Hour

Kudos [?]: 522 [0], given: 23

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 30 Jul 2014
Posts: 137

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 98

GPA: 3.72
Reviews Badge
Re: The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Aug 2015, 07:35
I made a silly mistake to not think the stimulus properly and opted the choice E. Choice E is completely out of scope.
_________________

A lot needs to be learned from all of you.

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 98

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2015
Posts: 53

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 16

GMAT 1: 580 Q37 V33
GMAT 2: 580 Q39 V31
GMAT 3: 660 Q44 V36
GMAT 4: 560 Q40 V28
GMAT 5: 580 Q37 V32
GMAT 6: 680 Q45 V37
GMAT 7: 690 Q47 V37
Re: The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jul 2016, 14:37
I got stuck between option B and D.
Option b says Number of fires have increased in houses thereby supporting that fires are no more likely to be detected with smoke detectors which mostly are inoperative or without battery
Option D also passes negation test.
Can you help with getting more clarity

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 16

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Status: love the club...
Joined: 24 Mar 2015
Posts: 168

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 400

Re: The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Oct 2017, 09:42
OptimusPrepJanielle wrote:
The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45 percent of homes now have smoke detectors, whereas only 30 percent of homes had them 10 years ago. This makes early detection of house fires no more likely, however, because over half of the domestic smoke detectors are either without batteries or else inoperative for some other reason.

The conclusion is that smoke detectors are still not effective despite the increase in their prevalence because many of them don't function (due to lack of batteries or other issue).

In order for the conclusion above to be properly drawn, which one of the following assumptions would have to be made?

(A) Fifteen percent of domestic smoke detectors were installed less than 10 years ago.
not relevant
(B) The number of fires per year in homes with smoke detectors has increased.
not relevant
(C) Not all of the smoke detectors in homes are battery operated.
There are also other reasons that they are inoperative.
(D) The proportion of domestic smoke detectors that are inoperative has increased in the past ten years.
If just as many detectors were inoperative in the past, their current inefficacy can't be attributed to malfunction.
(E) Unlike automatic water sprinklers, a properly functioning smoke detector cannot by itself increase fire safety in a home. out of scope



hi

I was stuck between B and D, and perhaps still now

The conclusion - smoke detectors are not effective - can also be drawn if assumed choice B

please let me resolve the issue

thanks in advance

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 400

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 30 Jan 2017
Posts: 73

Kudos [?]: 54 [1], given: 31

Location: India
Schools: ISB '19
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GPA: 3.9
CAT Tests
Re: The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Oct 2017, 00:47
1
This post received
KUDOS
gmatcracker2017 wrote:
OptimusPrepJanielle wrote:
The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45 percent of homes now have smoke detectors, whereas only 30 percent of homes had them 10 years ago. This makes early detection of house fires no more likely, however, because over half of the domestic smoke detectors are either without batteries or else inoperative for some other reason.

The conclusion is that smoke detectors are still not effective despite the increase in their prevalence because many of them don't function (due to lack of batteries or other issue).

In order for the conclusion above to be properly drawn, which one of the following assumptions would have to be made?

(A) Fifteen percent of domestic smoke detectors were installed less than 10 years ago.
not relevant
(B) The number of fires per year in homes with smoke detectors has increased.
not relevant
(C) Not all of the smoke detectors in homes are battery operated.
There are also other reasons that they are inoperative.
(D) The proportion of domestic smoke detectors that are inoperative has increased in the past ten years.
If just as many detectors were inoperative in the past, their current inefficacy can't be attributed to malfunction.
(E) Unlike automatic water sprinklers, a properly functioning smoke detector cannot by itself increase fire safety in a home. out of scope



hi

I was stuck between B and D, and perhaps still now

The conclusion - smoke detectors are not effective - can also be drawn if assumed choice B

please let me resolve the issue

thanks in advance


Since we are already given a reason for "early detection of house fires no more likely", an increase in the number of fires per year in homes with smoke detectors cannot be a correct assumption. A correct assumption to the conclusion will be on the lines of the increase in the PROPORTION/PERCENTAGE of homes with smoke detectors.

Only if the PERCENTAGE of malfunctioning smoke detectors has increased, we will nullify the advantage of increase in PERCENTAGE of homes with smoke detectors and hence arrive at the conclusion that "early detection of house fires no more likely".

Also note that a common misconception is that an increase/decrease in PERCENTAGE automatically leads to increasing/decreasing numbers. Option B talks about numbers and Option D talks about percentage. The question only gives us information about PERCENTAGES.

Kudos [?]: 54 [1], given: 31

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Status: love the club...
Joined: 24 Mar 2015
Posts: 168

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 400

Re: The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Oct 2017, 10:28
fmik7894 wrote:
gmatcracker2017 wrote:
OptimusPrepJanielle wrote:
The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45 percent of homes now have smoke detectors, whereas only 30 percent of homes had them 10 years ago. This makes early detection of house fires no more likely, however, because over half of the domestic smoke detectors are either without batteries or else inoperative for some other reason.

The conclusion is that smoke detectors are still not effective despite the increase in their prevalence because many of them don't function (due to lack of batteries or other issue).

In order for the conclusion above to be properly drawn, which one of the following assumptions would have to be made?

(A) Fifteen percent of domestic smoke detectors were installed less than 10 years ago.
not relevant
(B) The number of fires per year in homes with smoke detectors has increased.
not relevant
(C) Not all of the smoke detectors in homes are battery operated.
There are also other reasons that they are inoperative.
(D) The proportion of domestic smoke detectors that are inoperative has increased in the past ten years.
If just as many detectors were inoperative in the past, their current inefficacy can't be attributed to malfunction.
(E) Unlike automatic water sprinklers, a properly functioning smoke detector cannot by itself increase fire safety in a home. out of scope



hi

I was stuck between B and D, and perhaps still now

The conclusion - smoke detectors are not effective - can also be drawn if assumed choice B

please let me resolve the issue

thanks in advance


Since we are already given a reason for "early detection of house fires no more likely", an increase in the number of fires per year in homes with smoke detectors cannot be a correct assumption. A correct assumption to the conclusion will be on the lines of the increase in the PROPORTION/PERCENTAGE of homes with smoke detectors.

Only if the PERCENTAGE of malfunctioning smoke detectors has increased, we will nullify the advantage of increase in PERCENTAGE of homes with smoke detectors and hence arrive at the conclusion that "early detection of house fires no more likely".

Also note that a common misconception is that an increase/decrease in PERCENTAGE automatically leads to increasing/decreasing numbers. Option B talks about numbers and Option D talks about percentage. The question only gives us information about PERCENTAGES.


thank you

the argument is talking about percentages but choice B comes up with hard numbers, that's the point ...
easy one actually
thanks to you again, man

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 400

Re: The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45   [#permalink] 12 Oct 2017, 10:28
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.