GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 16 Jan 2019, 02:06

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in January
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### The winning strategy for a high GRE score

January 17, 2019

January 17, 2019

08:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Learn the winning strategy for a high GRE score — what do people who reach a high score do differently? We're going to share insights, tips and strategies from data we've collected from over 50,000 students who used examPAL.
• ### Free GMAT Strategy Webinar

January 19, 2019

January 19, 2019

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.

# The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

CEO
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3377
The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 20 Sep 2017, 01:44
5
17
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

63% (02:06) correct 37% (02:17) wrong based on 955 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

13. The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45 percent of homes now have smoke detectors, whereas only 30 percent of homes had them 10 years ago. This makes early detection of house fires no more likely, however, because over half of the domestic smoke detectors are either without batteries or else inoperative for some other reason.

In order for the conclusion above to be properly drawn, which one of the following assumptions would have to be made?

(A) Fifteen percent of domestic smoke detectors were installed less than 10 years ago.

(B) The number of fires per year in homes with smoke detectors has increased.

(C) Not all of the smoke detectors in homes are battery operated.

(D) The proportion of domestic smoke detectors that are inoperative has increased in the past ten years.

(E) Unlike automatic water sprinklers, a properly functioning smoke detector cannot by itself increase fire safety in a home.

Source: LSAT

Originally posted by Praetorian on 27 Sep 2003, 10:10.
Last edited by broall on 20 Sep 2017, 01:44, edited 1 time in total.
Reformatted question
Intern
Joined: 16 Sep 2014
Posts: 11
Lsat:The National Association of Fire Fighters says that  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Sep 2014, 09:06
2
5
The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45 percent of homes now have smoke detectors, whereas only 30 percent of homes had them 10 years ago. This makes early detection of house fires no more likely, however, because over half of the domestic smoke detectors are either without batteries or else inoperative for some other reason.

In order for the conclusion above to be properly drawn, which one of the following assumptions would have to be made?

(A) Fifteen percent of domestic smoke detectors were installed less than 10 years ago.

(B) The number of fires per year in homes with smoke detectors has increased.

(C) Not all of the smoke detectors in homes are battery operated.

(D) The proportion of domestic smoke detectors that are inoperative has increased in the past ten years.

(E) Unlike automatic water sprinklers, a properly functioning smoke detector cannot by itself increase fire safety in a home
_________________

Please Consider providing Kudos If you like my posts

##### General Discussion
SVP
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1564
Re: The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Sep 2003, 11:41
1
I vote for D. If the proportion of domestic smoke detectors that are inoperative had decreased in the past ten years, then this would have made early detection of house fires more likely.
SVP
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1564
Re: The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2003, 10:31
1
The negation rule really works.
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1323
Re: Lsat:The National Association of Fire Fighters says that  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Sep 2014, 13:26
3
1
lavanyak92 wrote:
The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45 percent of homes now have smoke detectors, whereas only 30 percent of homes had them 10 years ago. This makes early detection of house fires no more likely, however, because over half of the domestic smoke detectors are either without batteries or else inoperative for some other reason.

The question tells us that 45% of homes now have smoke detectors, but, more than half of those don't work. So less than 22.5% have working smoke detectors. If the same proportion of smoke detectors didn't work ten years ago, then less than 15% of homes would have had working detectors then, and more homes would have working detectors now than before. The conclusion of the argument, that smoke detection is not better now than before, can only be true if (a lot) more detectors are inoperative now than ten years ago, which is what D says.
_________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

SVP
Joined: 06 Nov 2014
Posts: 1881
Re: The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2015, 09:19
The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45 percent of homes now have smoke detectors, whereas only 30 percent of homes had them 10 years ago. This makes early detection of house fires no more likely, however, because over half of the domestic smoke detectors are either without batteries or else inoperative for some other reason.

The conclusion is that smoke detectors are still not effective despite the increase in their prevalence because many of them don't function (due to lack of batteries or other issue).

In order for the conclusion above to be properly drawn, which one of the following assumptions would have to be made?

(A) Fifteen percent of domestic smoke detectors were installed less than 10 years ago.
not relevant
(B) The number of fires per year in homes with smoke detectors has increased.
not relevant
(C) Not all of the smoke detectors in homes are battery operated.
There are also other reasons that they are inoperative.
(D) The proportion of domestic smoke detectors that are inoperative has increased in the past ten years.
If just as many detectors were inoperative in the past, their current inefficacy can't be attributed to malfunction.
(E) Unlike automatic water sprinklers, a properly functioning smoke detector cannot by itself increase fire safety in a home. out of scope
Manager
Joined: 30 Jul 2014
Posts: 130
GPA: 3.72
Re: The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2015, 06:35
I made a silly mistake to not think the stimulus properly and opted the choice E. Choice E is completely out of scope.
_________________

A lot needs to be learned from all of you.

Intern
Joined: 16 Jul 2015
Posts: 40
GMAT 1: 580 Q37 V33
GMAT 2: 580 Q39 V31
GMAT 3: 560 Q40 V28
GMAT 4: 580 Q37 V32
GMAT 5: 680 Q45 V37
GMAT 6: 690 Q47 V37
Re: The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jul 2016, 13:37
1
I got stuck between option B and D.
Option b says Number of fires have increased in houses thereby supporting that fires are no more likely to be detected with smoke detectors which mostly are inoperative or without battery
Option D also passes negation test.
Can you help with getting more clarity
Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2601
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Re: Lsat:The National Association of Fire Fighters says that  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Sep 2016, 12:22
lavanyak92 wrote:
The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45 percent of homes now have smoke detectors, whereas only 30 percent of homes had them 10 years ago. This makes early detection of house fires no more likely, however, because over half of the domestic smoke detectors are either without batteries or else inoperative for some other reason.

In order for the conclusion above to be properly drawn, which one of the following assumptions would have to be made?

(A) Fifteen percent of domestic smoke detectors were installed less than 10 years ago.

(B) The number of fires per year in homes with smoke detectors has increased.

(C) Not all of the smoke detectors in homes are battery operated.

(D) The proportion of domestic smoke detectors that are inoperative has increased in the past ten years.

(E) Unlike automatic water sprinklers, a properly functioning smoke detector cannot by itself increase fire safety in a home

negate D
if such is true, the argument is not valid.
i'll go with D.
Senior Manager
Status: love the club...
Joined: 24 Mar 2015
Posts: 272
Re: The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Oct 2017, 08:42
OptimusPrepJanielle wrote:
The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45 percent of homes now have smoke detectors, whereas only 30 percent of homes had them 10 years ago. This makes early detection of house fires no more likely, however, because over half of the domestic smoke detectors are either without batteries or else inoperative for some other reason.

The conclusion is that smoke detectors are still not effective despite the increase in their prevalence because many of them don't function (due to lack of batteries or other issue).

In order for the conclusion above to be properly drawn, which one of the following assumptions would have to be made?

(A) Fifteen percent of domestic smoke detectors were installed less than 10 years ago.
not relevant
(B) The number of fires per year in homes with smoke detectors has increased.
not relevant
(C) Not all of the smoke detectors in homes are battery operated.
There are also other reasons that they are inoperative.
(D) The proportion of domestic smoke detectors that are inoperative has increased in the past ten years.
If just as many detectors were inoperative in the past, their current inefficacy can't be attributed to malfunction.
(E) Unlike automatic water sprinklers, a properly functioning smoke detector cannot by itself increase fire safety in a home. out of scope

hi

I was stuck between B and D, and perhaps still now

The conclusion - smoke detectors are not effective - can also be drawn if assumed choice B

please let me resolve the issue

Manager
Joined: 30 Jan 2017
Posts: 82
Location: India
Schools: ISB '19
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 660 Q47 V34
GMAT 3: 730 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.9
Re: The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2017, 23:47
2
gmatcracker2017 wrote:
OptimusPrepJanielle wrote:
The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45 percent of homes now have smoke detectors, whereas only 30 percent of homes had them 10 years ago. This makes early detection of house fires no more likely, however, because over half of the domestic smoke detectors are either without batteries or else inoperative for some other reason.

The conclusion is that smoke detectors are still not effective despite the increase in their prevalence because many of them don't function (due to lack of batteries or other issue).

In order for the conclusion above to be properly drawn, which one of the following assumptions would have to be made?

(A) Fifteen percent of domestic smoke detectors were installed less than 10 years ago.
not relevant
(B) The number of fires per year in homes with smoke detectors has increased.
not relevant
(C) Not all of the smoke detectors in homes are battery operated.
There are also other reasons that they are inoperative.
(D) The proportion of domestic smoke detectors that are inoperative has increased in the past ten years.
If just as many detectors were inoperative in the past, their current inefficacy can't be attributed to malfunction.
(E) Unlike automatic water sprinklers, a properly functioning smoke detector cannot by itself increase fire safety in a home. out of scope

hi

I was stuck between B and D, and perhaps still now

The conclusion - smoke detectors are not effective - can also be drawn if assumed choice B

please let me resolve the issue

Since we are already given a reason for "early detection of house fires no more likely", an increase in the number of fires per year in homes with smoke detectors cannot be a correct assumption. A correct assumption to the conclusion will be on the lines of the increase in the PROPORTION/PERCENTAGE of homes with smoke detectors.

Only if the PERCENTAGE of malfunctioning smoke detectors has increased, we will nullify the advantage of increase in PERCENTAGE of homes with smoke detectors and hence arrive at the conclusion that "early detection of house fires no more likely".

Also note that a common misconception is that an increase/decrease in PERCENTAGE automatically leads to increasing/decreasing numbers. Option B talks about numbers and Option D talks about percentage. The question only gives us information about PERCENTAGES.
Senior Manager
Status: love the club...
Joined: 24 Mar 2015
Posts: 272
Re: The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Oct 2017, 09:28
1
fmik7894 wrote:
gmatcracker2017 wrote:
OptimusPrepJanielle wrote:
The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45 percent of homes now have smoke detectors, whereas only 30 percent of homes had them 10 years ago. This makes early detection of house fires no more likely, however, because over half of the domestic smoke detectors are either without batteries or else inoperative for some other reason.

The conclusion is that smoke detectors are still not effective despite the increase in their prevalence because many of them don't function (due to lack of batteries or other issue).

In order for the conclusion above to be properly drawn, which one of the following assumptions would have to be made?

(A) Fifteen percent of domestic smoke detectors were installed less than 10 years ago.
not relevant
(B) The number of fires per year in homes with smoke detectors has increased.
not relevant
(C) Not all of the smoke detectors in homes are battery operated.
There are also other reasons that they are inoperative.
(D) The proportion of domestic smoke detectors that are inoperative has increased in the past ten years.
If just as many detectors were inoperative in the past, their current inefficacy can't be attributed to malfunction.
(E) Unlike automatic water sprinklers, a properly functioning smoke detector cannot by itself increase fire safety in a home. out of scope

hi

I was stuck between B and D, and perhaps still now

The conclusion - smoke detectors are not effective - can also be drawn if assumed choice B

please let me resolve the issue

Since we are already given a reason for "early detection of house fires no more likely", an increase in the number of fires per year in homes with smoke detectors cannot be a correct assumption. A correct assumption to the conclusion will be on the lines of the increase in the PROPORTION/PERCENTAGE of homes with smoke detectors.

Only if the PERCENTAGE of malfunctioning smoke detectors has increased, we will nullify the advantage of increase in PERCENTAGE of homes with smoke detectors and hence arrive at the conclusion that "early detection of house fires no more likely".

Also note that a common misconception is that an increase/decrease in PERCENTAGE automatically leads to increasing/decreasing numbers. Option B talks about numbers and Option D talks about percentage. The question only gives us information about PERCENTAGES.

thank you

the argument is talking about percentages but choice B comes up with hard numbers, that's the point ...
easy one actually
thanks to you again, man
BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1219
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Re: The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Mar 2018, 04:22
1
The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45 percent of homes now have smoke detectors, whereas only 30 percent of homes had them 10 years ago. This makes early detection of house fires no more likely, however, because over half of the domestic smoke detectors are either without batteries or else inoperative for some other reason.

In order for the conclusion above to be properly drawn, which one of the following assumptions would have to be made?

(A) Fifteen percent of domestic smoke detectors were installed less than 10 years ago. --Doesn't matter. They can still be faulty.

(B) The number of fires per year in homes with smoke detectors has increased. --Fires can still be detected using these detectors

(C) Not all of the smoke detectors in homes are battery operated. --These can can have other types of issues

(D) The proportion of domestic smoke detectors that are inoperative has increased in the past ten years. --Correct

(E) Unlike automatic water sprinklers, a properly functioning smoke detector cannot by itself increase fire safety in a home. --Argument is about smoke detection and not safety
_________________
Re: The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45 &nbs [#permalink] 18 Mar 2018, 04:22
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The National Association of Fire Fighters says that 45

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.