GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 10 Dec 2019, 04:44

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The number of cases in which prison inmates manipulate the welfare sys

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 08 Jan 2019
Posts: 54
The number of cases in which prison inmates manipulate the welfare sys  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 05 Apr 2019, 04:21
5
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

47% (02:33) correct 53% (02:41) wrong based on 125 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The number of cases in which prison inmates manipulate the welfare system to provide themselves with benefits is very small. But the widespread public outrage over such cases makes them tempting examples to use in arguments for severely limiting welfare programs. This is because these rare but extreme cases of welfare fraud help to harden public attitudes towards welfare more effectively than standard cases, in which needy, law-abiding individuals manipulate the system to receive larger benefits.

The claims above can best serve as part of an argument against the view that


A. those who wish to change public attitudes towards the poor should focus public attention on welfare

B. a type of welfare fraud can both be common and lead to widespread public outrage

C. the public is interested in welfare fraud

D. the frequency with which a type of welfare fraud occurs is a good indicator of its effect on public opinion

E. cases of welfare fraud occur less often than cases in which welfare benefits are not fraudulently received

Answer is D - the answer should be E - argument is against the view - if anything D is for the view if correctly read...

Originally posted by DebbieChats on 05 Apr 2019, 03:38.
Last edited by Bunuel on 05 Apr 2019, 04:21, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
Most Helpful Community Reply
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 22 Oct 2018
Posts: 17
Location: India
Schools: ISB '21
GMAT 1: 690 Q42 V41
The number of cases in which prison inmates manipulate the welfare sys  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Apr 2019, 04:52
6
Sneha333 wrote:
Please explain this question.
None of the options look correct.
D cannot be the answer as it is supported by the argument.
Also,E cannot be as Welfare fraud and fraudulently received welfare benefits are essentially welfare frauds.


understanding from question: inmates manipulate welfare system rarely compared to law abiding citizen , but those cases in which inmates are the culprits, make more public outrage than do those in which normal people are the culprit.

mental structure:

inmates committing fraud < public committing fraud - by number
inmate committing fraud >>> public committing fraud - by public outrage

therefore,
The claims above can best serve as part of an argument against the view that

d) the frequency with which a type of welfare fraud occurs is a good indicator of its effect on public opinion

since , if frequency of crime was a good indicator of effect in public opinion then a commoner committing fraud must create more outrage than a inmate committing fraud
General Discussion
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 24 Mar 2019
Posts: 46
The number of cases in which prison inmates manipulate the welfare sys  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Apr 2019, 02:28
Please explain this question.
None of the options look correct.
D cannot be the answer as it is supported by the argument.
Also,E cannot be as Welfare fraud and fraudulently received welfare benefits are essentially welfare frauds.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 22 Oct 2018
Posts: 17
Location: India
Schools: ISB '21
GMAT 1: 690 Q42 V41
Re: The number of cases in which prison inmates manipulate the welfare sys  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Apr 2019, 04:53
1
gmattodreamschool wrote:
Sneha333 wrote:
Please explain this question.
None of the options look correct.
D cannot be the answer as it is supported by the argument.
Also,E cannot be as Welfare fraud and fraudulently received welfare benefits are essentially welfare frauds.


understanding from question: inmates manipulate welfare system rarely compared to law abiding citizen , but those cases in which inmates are the culprits, make more public outrage than do those in which normal people are the culprit.

mental structure:

inmates committing fraud < public committing fraud - by number
inmate committing fraud >>> public committing fraud - by public outrage

therefore,
The claims above can best serve as part of an argument against the view that

d) the frequency with which a type of welfare fraud occurs is a good indicator of its effect on public opinion

since , if frequency of crime was a good indicator of effect in public opinion then a commoner committing fraud must create more outrage than a inmate committing fraud


by the way some kudos would be nice :)
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The number of cases in which prison inmates manipulate the welfare sys   [#permalink] 07 Apr 2019, 04:53
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The number of cases in which prison inmates manipulate the welfare sys

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





cron

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne