A. Well-paved streets near local merchants benefit their businesses. [u][b]Wrong.[/b][/u] It could be an assumption - As per the author, according to a recent survey, most citizen are in favor of this act which will benefits local merchants.
B. The citizens do not feel that the money is better spent on other town improvements. [u][b]Wrong.[/b][/u] as argument said that citizen are in favor.
C. Local merchants have stores in the downtown area. [u][b]Wrong.[/b][/u] Negation of this weaken the argument. So this could be an assumption
D. Streets in highly traveled areas need to be repaved periodically. [u][b]Right[/b] [/u]- We do not know which streets are being referring to. are the streets in highly traveled area in downtown?
E. The people recently surveyed accurately represent the opinions of those who will vote on the repaving decision. [u][b]Wrong.[/b][/u] If we negate this statement. It will weaken the argument. If surveyed sample do not accurately reflect the whole population then the premise used to draw an conclusion will not work.
[size=80][b][i]Posted from my mobile device[/i][/b][/size]