Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Select the dropdowns below and click "Submit" to add this question to your Error log.
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
26%
(03:12)
correct 74%
(03:28)
wrong
based on 359
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The 'Pay' section of the graph illustrates how the size and structure of annual compensation changed for executive management in the US over the period of 2000-2010 for the FTSE 350-rated companies. For the same period, the 'Performance' section of the graph illustrates the increase in the value of the companies managed by these delegates. The change in year-end share price for the duration 2000-10 for all FTSE 350 companies combined, shown by the small, negative bar in the graph, is –5%.
Long-term incentive plan refers to the giving of stock assets as a form of payment, earnings per share refers to the amount of pre-tax profit divided by the number of shares outstanding, and year-end share price is the price at which the stocks sell at the last day of the respective financial year.
Use the dropdown menus to complete the statements accurately, using the information provided in the diagram.
The change in the total number of shares outstanding, during the year 2000-10, of all companies combined, represented in the graph is approximately
P / E ratio is the ratio of the price per share and pre-tax profits per share. The combined P / E ratio for the FTSE 350 companies changed by
The change in the total number of shares outstanding, during the year 2000-10, of all companies combined, represented in the graph is approximately [-12]
\(EPS = \frac{Profit}{No.-of-Shares}\)
=> No. of Shares = \(\frac{Profit}{EPS}\)
Profit: F => New F = 1.5F New EPS: 1.7 EPS
=> New No. of Shares = \(\frac{1.5}{1.7} = 0.88\)
=> 12% Decrease
P / E ratio is the ratio of the price per share and pre-tax profits per share. The combined P / E ratio for the FTSE 350 companies changed by [-44]
(In P/E: E should be earnings per share)
Price P => New P: 0.95P Earning per share: E => New E: 1.7E
P1 old: EPS * S = PTP changed: 1.75 EPS * S = 1.5 PTP therefore, new S = 1.5 PTP/1.75 EPS = 6/7 PTP/EPS [note that reverse, or 1/7 is change and thereby answer, can cut below step]
change in S = 6/7 PTP/EPS divided by PTP/EPS - 1 ie 6/7 -1 = -14% and closest to -12%
P2 old: P/E = PPS/EPS new: P/E = 0.95 PPS / 1.75 EPS therefore, new P/E = 0.95/1.75 approx = 4/7 = 0.571 [note that reverse, or 3/7 is change and thereby answer, can cut below step]
change in P/E = (0.571 - 1)/1 = 0.429 and closest to -44
P1 old: EPS * S = PTP changed: 1.75 EPS * S = 1.5 PTP therefore, new S = 1.5 PTP/1.75 EPS = 6/7 PTP/EPS [note that reverse, or 1/7 is change and thereby answer, can cut below step]
change in S = 6/7 PTP/EPS divided by PTP/EPS - 1 ie 6/7 -1 = -14% and closest to -12%
P2 old: P/E = PPS/EPS new: P/E = 0.95 PPS / 1.75 EPS therefore, new P/E = 0.95/1.75 approx = 4/7 = 0.571 [note that reverse, or 3/7 is change and thereby answer, can cut below step]
change in P/E = (0.571 - 1)/1 = 0.429 and closest to -44
please help with any shorter way!
Show more
In P2 isnt P/E is PPS/PTP? In that case new P/E = 0.95 PPS/ 1.5 PTP So change in P/E = -36.6%
P1 old: EPS * S = PTP changed: 1.75 EPS * S = 1.5 PTP therefore, new S = 1.5 PTP/1.75 EPS = 6/7 PTP/EPS [note that reverse, or 1/7 is change and thereby answer, can cut below step]
change in S = 6/7 PTP/EPS divided by PTP/EPS - 1 ie 6/7 -1 = -14% and closest to -12%
P2 old: P/E = PPS/EPS new: P/E = 0.95 PPS / 1.75 EPS therefore, new P/E = 0.95/1.75 approx = 4/7 = 0.571 [note that reverse, or 3/7 is change and thereby answer, can cut below step]
change in P/E = (0.571 - 1)/1 = 0.429 and closest to -44
please help with any shorter way!
In P2 isnt P/E is PPS/PTP? In that case new P/E = 0.95 PPS/ 1.5 PTP So change in P/E = -36.6%
Show more
As EPS is defined as PTP/Number of shares "earnings per share refers to the amount of pre-tax profit divided by the number of shares outstanding" And P/E as "P / E ratio is the ratio of the price per share and pre-tax profits per share." Therefore, EPS is the right metric to use for P/E as it is pre-tax profits per share
The change in year-end share price (the last bar in the chart) for the duration 2000-10 for all FTSE 350 companies combined, shown by the small, negative bar in the graph, is –5%.
=> Share price (or Price per share) experienced a 5% decrease => New Price = 95% = 0.95 Original Price
dhamsha2
In part 2, How did u guys calculate P = .95(Price per share). Please explain.
Yours is a pretty succinct method! It takes a while to piece through some of these DI questions but once you know what to do, it's pretty straightforward.
NisB
P1 old: EPS * S = PTP changed: 1.75 EPS * S = 1.5 PTP therefore, new S = 1.5 PTP/1.75 EPS = 6/7 PTP/EPS [note that reverse, or 1/7 is change and thereby answer, can cut below step]
change in S = 6/7 PTP/EPS divided by PTP/EPS - 1 ie 6/7 -1 = -14% and closest to -12%
P2 old: P/E = PPS/EPS new: P/E = 0.95 PPS / 1.75 EPS therefore, new P/E = 0.95/1.75 approx = 4/7 = 0.571 [note that reverse, or 3/7 is change and thereby answer, can cut below step]
change in P/E = (0.571 - 1)/1 = 0.429 and closest to -44