Last visit was: 03 Jun 2026, 10:57 It is currently 03 Jun 2026, 10:57
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
GMATT73
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Last visit: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2,877
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,877
Kudos: 1,297
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
nero44
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
Last visit: 28 May 2006
Posts: 134
Own Kudos:
Posts: 134
Kudos: 399
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
laxieqv
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Last visit: 24 Jun 2011
Posts: 831
Own Kudos:
Posts: 831
Kudos: 1,537
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
nakib77
Joined: 28 May 2005
Last visit: 09 Aug 2008
Posts: 984
Own Kudos:
Location: Dhaka
Posts: 984
Kudos: 3,726
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
got C) took me 3 minutes.

first of all because portfolio value is increasing by 2% overall the new value will be (20+35+40+45+70) * 1.02 = 210 *1.02 = little higher than 214

so we can say 1.15x- .85y = 4.xx

now it is number plugging time, if you put 70 as y and 45 as x you get the difference. 51.75 -47.5 = 4.25

so the stock valued at 20, 35 and 40 will remain constant.
User avatar
duttsit
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Last visit: 19 Feb 2016
Posts: 493
Own Kudos:
Location: CA
Posts: 493
Kudos: 710
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My intuition says E. (1.5 min)

the avg stock portfolio price : 210/5 = 42

fi avg increased by 2% or by 0.84, the sum of all stock prices should increase by 0.84 * 5 or ~ $ 4.2

in oder to get this difference,

maximum price stock would have increase by 15%
minimum value stock would have decreased by 35%
User avatar
gotoknow3
Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Last visit: 27 Feb 2006
Posts: 108
Own Kudos:
Posts: 108
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Its E; Same explanation as duttsit
User avatar
GMATT73
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Last visit: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2,877
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,877
Kudos: 1,297
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If the overall average price of the portfolio increased, despite the larger percentage drop in one stock than the percentage increase in another , then the stock that went down in price must have been fairly cheap, while the stock that increased must have had a high price. $70 clearly stands out to balance off the price decline. Because the percentage value of a 35% drop is more than twice the percentage value of a 15% increase, in order to get a positive end result, the initial price of the increased stock must have been more than twice that of the reduced security. The only two stocks that are more than two times apart are $20 and $70. The best answer is E.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!