It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 16:46

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The ratio of cupcakes to children at a particular birthday

 post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2006
Posts: 87

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

The ratio of cupcakes to children at a particular birthday [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2007, 16:13
This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

The ratio of cupcakes to children at a particular birthday party is 104 to 7. Each chiled at the birthday party eats exactly x cupcakes (where x is a positive integer) and the adults attending the birthday paraty do not ear anything. If the number of cupcakes that remain uneaten is less than the number of children at the birthday party, what must be true about the number of uneaten cupcakes?

I. It is a multiple of 2.
II. It is a multiple of 3.
III. It is a multiple of 7.

Pick which applies.

I do not know how to approach this question thanks.

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Posts: 454

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2007, 16:57
They must have had 14 cupcakes each.

7*14 = 98. Remaining uneaten is 6x.

So, I and II are true.

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 376

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2007, 11:42
ioiio wrote:
They must have had 14 cupcakes each.

7*14 = 98. Remaining uneaten is 6x.

So, I and II are true.

How did u get that ?

Let the ratio be 104y:7y

Now 104y - 7yx <7y> 1

Now if we go on to solve for x we get x > 97/7. But we need to make our decision based on equation 1.

I dont see any of the 3 choices to be absolutely true.

nfa1rhp can u post the original OE ?

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 22 May 2007
Posts: 121

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2007, 12:22
ioiio wrote:
They must have had 14 cupcakes each.

7*14 = 98. Remaining uneaten is 6x.

So, I and II are true.

Not exactly. If there were 7 children, the cupcakes would be 728.
If each child ate 14 we would have 630 left, which is more than 7!!
I think we need less than 728-7 to be consumed or 722.
Number left-6. In this case I and II stand.

Seems like I and II.

What is OA?

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 04 Aug 2005
Posts: 202

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2007, 13:49
Hayabusa, I think you missed the part of the problem where it said that the ratio is 104 cupcakes per every 7 children. Not 104 cupcakes per child (talk about a sugar rush!)

I think I know where ioiio was trying to go with that. If you divide 104 by 7, you get that each child would get a minimum of ~14.85 cupcakes, or 14 whole cupcakes (assuming that there is a minimum of 7 children and 104 cupcakes).

Then, if you multiply the 14 whole cupcakes by the 7 children you come up with 98 whole cupcakes, meaning that you'd have 6 leftover cupcakes. So, by this logic, since 2 (I.) and 3 (II.) are both multiples of 6, then I and II would be true. I have no idea if this would hold true if there were more children.

I have absolutely no idea if this is right, or even in the right ballpark. Is the OA available?

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 22 May 2007
Posts: 121

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2007, 13:59
ishcabibble wrote:
Hayabusa, I think you missed the part of the problem where it said that the ratio is 104 cupcakes per every 7 children. Not 104 cupcakes per child (talk about a sugar rush!)

I think I know where ioiio was trying to go with that. If you divide 104 by 7, you get that each child would get a minimum of ~14.85 cupcakes, or 14 whole cupcakes (assuming that there is a minimum of 7 children and 104 cupcakes).

Then, if you multiply the 14 whole cupcakes by the 7 children you come up with 98 whole cupcakes, meaning that you'd have 6 leftover cupcakes. So, by this logic, since 2 (I.) and 3 (II.) are both multiples of 6, then I and II would be true. I have no idea if this would hold true if there were more children.

I have absolutely no idea if this is right, or even in the right ballpark. Is the OA available?

Oooops Absolutely! I owe ioiio an apology.

Still, I and II make sense to me.

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 27 May 2007
Posts: 128

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2007, 15:53
I agree that it's I and II, for the same reasoning - that 104/7=14, r6. If 104:7 is the ratio, the remainder would always be a multiple of 6. (208/14=14, r12, 312/21=14,r18 etc....)

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Posts: 454

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2007, 15:54
ishcabibble wrote:
Hayabusa, I think you missed the part of the problem where it said that the ratio is 104 cupcakes per every 7 children. Not 104 cupcakes per child (talk about a sugar rush!)

I think I know where ioiio was trying to go with that. If you divide 104 by 7, you get that each child would get a minimum of ~14.85 cupcakes, or 14 whole cupcakes (assuming that there is a minimum of 7 children and 104 cupcakes).

Then, if you multiply the 14 whole cupcakes by the 7 children you come up with 98 whole cupcakes, meaning that you'd have 6 leftover cupcakes. So, by this logic, since 2 (I.) and 3 (II.) are both multiples of 6, then I and II would be true. I have no idea if this would hold true if there were more children.

I have absolutely no idea if this is right, or even in the right ballpark. Is the OA available?

Sorry Guyz. I dont get to check the forums at work. Yeah! you were right about how I got that solution.

I should have explained better. I have been solving these GMAT problems for all of two days now. I am yet to get used to the jargon used here and sometimes have no clue whether any of my ramblings make sense to others or not

Will get better in a few days. I promise

Btw, whats the OA?

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2006
Posts: 87

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2007, 18:13
Sorry all, the the correct answer OA? I and II only thank you all.

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

24 Jul 2007, 18:13
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The ratio of cupcakes to children at a particular birthday

 post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.